• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.
I don't know why Trump is meddling in NYC municipal policy, or even why policies would need federal approval to begin with. The business of the federal government is the federal government, not that of states or cities within them. MTA looks to be fighting it:

“Today, the MTA filed papers in federal court to ensure that the highly successful program – which has already dramatically reduced congestion, bringing reduced traffic and faster travel times, while increasing speeds for buses and emergency vehicles – will continue notwithstanding this baseless effort to snatch those benefits away from the millions of mass transit users, pedestrians and, especially, the drivers who come to the Manhattan Central Business District. It’s mystifying that after four years and 4,000 pages of federally-supervised environmental review – and barely three months after giving final approval to the Congestion Relief Program – USDOT would seek to totally reverse course.”
 
Trump's lifelong hatred and resentment of New York City for rejecting him socially is well-known. His desire to destroy the city and make the lives of New Yorkers as miserable as possible should not surprise anyone.
 
Trump backs removing the limited autonomy of Washington, DC the city and giving control of the city back to the federal government.

 
Trump's lifelong hatred and resentment of New York City for rejecting him socially is well-known. His desire to destroy the city and make the lives of New Yorkers as miserable as possible should not surprise anyone.
I'd add that while this is certainly at play, it is mixed with a desire to bring NYC to heel and make them bend to his will. By extorting the NYC Mayor (Adams) through holding the corruption charges over his head (via a dismissal without prejudice), Trump ensures that the NYC Mayor becomes his helpless, willing puppet, thus making him, Trump, the de-facto Mayor of NYC... which, on some level, is what he has always really wanted...possibly even more than being POTUS... to be boss of New York, the top guy in the Big City.

I bet if Trump could just turn over the "work" of the Presidency to Elon Musk, and go rule NYC from Trump Tower like a feudal lord, he would relish that, far more than having to grind out his term in Washington. He seems a little bored already, constantly trying to one-up himself to watch the media and Democratic cats chase the proverbial laser pointer... all for his daily amusement.

EDIT: Aaaand as if on cue... see the article cited above by @SemiLazyGamer ... Trump wants to be Boss of a major city and all the direct perks and micromanagement/corruption opportunities that come with that, maybe more than he wants to serve as POTUS. Its not that he doesn't want to be POTUS, just that he probably loathes the work and constant criticism/scrutiny, whereas being "Boss Hogg" of a big city is a lot more fun, with far less negative attention... especially if you are thoroughly corrupt and without conscience or scruples, which Trump most certainly is.
 
Last edited:
Trump ensures that the NYC Mayor becomes his helpless, willing puppet, thus making him, Trump, the de-facto Mayor of NYC... which, on some level, is what he has always really wanted...possibly even more than being POTUS... to be boss of New York, the top guy in the Big City
On a somewhat similar note, in the early 90s, Trump tried and failed to buy an NFL team. On the issue of fun, it probably would've sated him for a while, though I would imagine he would've run the team down, through too many "big trades" of questionable return. I could totally see him making the Watson trade.

If he had become a team owner, I'm unsure if he'd ever have run for office. He'd probably sell the team, after tanking it, and move to other endeavors, but, tanking a team may have done just enough harm to his reputation(considering the demographics of MAGA support) that he loses go HRC(presuming a restricted butterfly effect)
 
On a somewhat similar note, in the early 90s, Trump tried and failed to buy an NFL team. On the issue of fun, it probably would've sated him for a while, though I would imagine he would've run the team down, through too many "big trades" of questionable return. I could totally see him making the Watson trade.

If he had become a team owner, I'm unsure if he'd ever have run for office. He'd probably sell the team, after tanking it, and move to other endeavors, but, tanking a team may have done just enough harm to his reputation(considering the demographics of MAGA support) that he loses go HRC(presuming a restricted butterfly effect)
He already tanked an entire league with his antics as the owner of the New Jersey Generals in the USFL
 
Uh, yup?

I said "Canadian" to refer to Jordan, then I remembered you'd read the joke about (EDIT)Trump renaming things*, so I called him a "North Montanan" since you dislike him so.

Deep mysteries afoot, here.

*EDIT: and the content of the video

I couldn't stomach watching the entire thing. Peterson is beyond disgusting.

That said, he is still Canadian by citizenship. I don't have to like him to point that out.

FFS, even Wayne Gretzky is still technically Canadian, even though he's a Trump sycophant and can't be bothered to show up in Ottawa to collect the Order of Canada that was given to him nearly TEN YEARS AGO (it's like someone in the UK not bothering to show up for a knighting ceremony after agreeing to accept the honor).*

*I used to like Gretzky. My dad and I would watch the hockey games when the Oilers played, but after Gretzky was traded to the Americans, my dad switched his support to the Flames.

And "North Montanan" is every bit a jerk thing to say as some of what Trump and his ilk have said with regard to renaming stuff. Montana is directly south of the province in which I live. I live in Alberta. I do NOT live in "North Montana." :huh:
 
I show you respect my way, you take issue.

I attempt to show you respect the way I read you to demand, you take issue. EDIT: As always, that shall remain your choice and in your court. ENDEDIT

Look, at this point I don't like engaging, it always winds up unpleasant as I'm whatever you want to beat on at the moment. If you need that more than you think it wounds me, then by all means. Grief sucks, I haven't shaken hardly any of it off myself. Isolation sucks, I know.

So, I'd like it if you'd stop engaging, but I'll continue to respond should you desire it, D'Ur.
 
Moderator Action: If you want to talk about Canadian stuff, please start a new thread.
 
Kash Patel has been confirmed as FBI director.

Senate narrowly confirms Trump nominee Kash Patel for FBI director​

The Senate on Thursday narrowly voted to confirm Kash Patel as the FBI’s ninth director, installing a close ally of President Donald Trump and a staunch critic of the bureau to lead the country’s premier law enforcement agency.

Patel was approved 51-49, a remarkably tight margin for a position that historically has seen nominees win overwhelming bipartisan support. Each of the last three FBI directors garnered the votes of at least 92 senators.

While Democratic senators expressed deep concerns about Patel, pointing to his history of inflammatory rhetoric and calls for retribution against perceived enemies, many of their Republican counterparts hailed him as the person needed to fix an agency they say has become politicized.

The GOP-majority Senate has approved every Trump nominee to come before the chamber so far, though three Republican defections on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth meant Vice President JD Vance, who serves as Senate president, was called in to cast the tiebreaking vote.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/02/20/kash-patel-fbi-senate-confirmation-vote/
 

CBS Wants Trump's Personal Financial Info If Lawsuit Moves To Discovery​

Trump wants $20 billion in damages — more than double the value of CBS's parent company.

Lawyers representing CBS Broadcasting told a Texas federal court Tuesday they will need President Donald Trump’s personal financial information if his $20 billion lawsuit against the company moves to discovery.
That includes the finances of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, Trump Media & Technology Group (which is itself in a unique revenue situation), and Trump’s numerous crypto ventures.

“Defendants further anticipate that discovery will be needed into President Trump’s legal relationship, if any, with the Donald J. Trump for President 2024 campaign and the Trump Media & Technology Group,” the legal team wrote in a filing obtained by Deadline.
Trump originally sued CBS for $10 billion in October, alleging that “60 Minutes” had deceptively edited an interview with his Democratic rival Kamala Harris in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

After CBS sought to have the suit dismissed, Trump upped the demand to $20 billion ― more than double the value of CBS’s parent company, Paramount Global. The judge overseeing the case then denied CBS’s motion as a procedural matter, since the original suit had been amended.
Advertisement

Trump was originally scheduled to sit for a similar interview with “60 Minutes,” but backed out at the last minute. He then responded to Harris’ interview in a rage-filled rant and demanded CBS lose its broadcast license, a threat he’s also made about NBC, ABC and CNN.
CBS News publicly released the full transcripts and videos of the interview earlier this month under pressure from Trump’s newly appointed Federal Communications Commission chairman, Brendan Carr.
The network said in a statement that the transcripts “show – consistent with 60 Minutes’ repeated assurances to the public – that the 60 Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful.”
Advertisement

“In reporting the news, journalists regularly edit interviews – for time, space or clarity,” the network added. “In making these edits, 60 Minutes is always guided by the truth and what we believe will be most informative to the viewing public – all while working within the constraints of broadcast television.” Trump has benefited greatly from similar edits himself: Fox News extensively edited footage of Trump visiting a New York City barbershop last year, making him appear significantly more cogent.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us.
Support HuffPost

A Fox News spokesperson told HuffPost afterward that the segment had to be pretaped and edited “for time and clarity.”
Advertisement
 

Ukraine must strike minerals deal, says Trump adviser​

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky needs to return to the negotiating table and strike a deal on US access to Ukraine's critical minerals, White House national security adviser Mike Waltz has said.

On Wednesday, Zelensky rejected US demands for a share of its rare earth minerals - a "deal" Trump said would reflect the amount of aid the US had provided to Ukraine during its war with Russia.

The comments, made at a White House briefing on Thursday, overshadowed a meeting in Kyiv between Zelensky and Keith Kellogg, the US chief envoy to Ukraine.

Waltz said the White House was "very frustrated" with Zelensky after he levelled "unacceptable" insults at US President Donald Trump earlier this week.

Ukraine holds huge deposits of critical elements and minerals, including lithium and titanium, as well as sizeable coal, gas, oil and uranium deposits - a supply worth billions of dollars.

Earlier on Thursday, Waltz suggested US access to rare minerals in Ukraine could be exchanged in return for aid - or even as compensation for the support the US has already provided.

"We presented the Ukrainians really an incredible, and a historic opportunity," the adviser said, adding that it would be "sustainable" and "the best" security guarantee Ukraine could hope for.

But Zelensky had refused the offer, saying: "I can't sell our state."

Waltz's comments in the White House news briefing came shortly after the conclusion of Zelensky's meeting with Kellogg in Kyiv, after which the Ukrainian leader announced he was ready to make an "investment and security agreement" with the US to end the war in Ukraine.

The meeting was hailed as "productive" by Zelensky - but it more closely resembled an awkward political date.

As the senior members of Donald Trump's team continued to engage directly with Moscow, the retired general had said he was in Kyiv to "listen".

But it soon became apparent he wouldn't speak, publicly that is, after a news conference was cancelled at the last minute.

The BBC understands it was a US decision, with Ukrainian sources claiming they believed Kellogg had been "sidelined" by the White House.

The meeting with Kellogg had been of huge importance to Kyiv, given that officials are relying on the special envoy to relay its needs to Washington.

In a post shared on X, the Ukrainian president said he and the US special envoy had "a detailed conversation about the battlefield situation, how to return our prisoners of war, and effective security guarantees".

He added: "Ukraine is ready for a strong, effective investment and security agreement with the president of the United States."

However, the possible reasons for Mr Kellogg not wanting to face questions are mounting.

Kellogg's meeting comes in the context of a war of words between his boss Donald Trump and Ukraine's leader, which culminated in the US president referring to Zelensky as a "dictator without elections".

Trump also blamed him for starting Russia's invasion.

Now there are reports that the US is refusing to recognise a UN resolution which labels Moscow as the aggressor while recognising Ukraine's territorial integrity.

Earlier this week, Zelensky was excluded from talks between senior Russian and American officials who met in Saudi Arabia to discuss the possibility of ending the conflict.

The war began when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, following its earlier annexation of Ukrainian territory.

Trump, who has been in office for one month, believes US involvement in the war is not in America's interest - and in a radical reversal of previous US foreign policy, he has chosen to negotiate directly with Russia to secure a quick end to the conflict.

On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio emerged after more than four hours of talks with Russian diplomats in Riyadh to declare that the first steps towards negotiations had been agreed, with teams to be formed on both sides.

After the meeting in the Middle East, Trump suggested Zelensky had "started" the war with Russia - claims which led Zelensky to describe the US president as "living in this disinformation space" governed by Moscow.

Trump hit back with his "dictator" attack and claimed Zelensky had low popularity ratings among the Ukrainian electorate.

Looking forward, Ukraine will be concerned by the prospect of Russia-US talks continuing without the direct involvement of Ukraine.

"Nothing is off the negotiating table," claimed US Vice-President JD Vance.

The problem for Ukraine is that it isn't even sitting at it.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqjn74gdwzo
 
Coming from the side who sold "Never Surrender" shirts of his mugshot where he was literally surrendering.
i looked up this guy, so associated party is just regular euroscandi right wing stuff. this is not an american conservative or a warhawk or whatever. the party supports multiculturalism and lgbt rights and such. just right wing economically, and supports a smaller state. basically just liberal centrist (on a grand scale). from a superficial glance, seems trustworthy.

wonder what eu is gonna say to this. it's a trajectory thing. do we really trust that the us is a dependable ally at this point lmao

small subnote in the article, because i'm always gonna stress this. biggest boy trump want all nato members to pay 5% gdp to military. i can't stress enough how massive a proportional cost that is. the us, with its infamous degree of military spending, spends 3.5%
 

Ukraine must strike minerals deal, says Trump adviser​

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky needs to return to the negotiating table and strike a deal on US access to Ukraine's critical minerals, White House national security adviser Mike Waltz has said.

On Wednesday, Zelensky rejected US demands for a share of its rare earth minerals - a "deal" Trump said would reflect the amount of aid the US had provided to Ukraine during its war with Russia.

The comments, made at a White House briefing on Thursday, overshadowed a meeting in Kyiv between Zelensky and Keith Kellogg, the US chief envoy to Ukraine.

Waltz said the White House was "very frustrated" with Zelensky after he levelled "unacceptable" insults at US President Donald Trump earlier this week.

Ukraine holds huge deposits of critical elements and minerals, including lithium and titanium, as well as sizeable coal, gas, oil and uranium deposits - a supply worth billions of dollars.

Earlier on Thursday, Waltz suggested US access to rare minerals in Ukraine could be exchanged in return for aid - or even as compensation for the support the US has already provided.

"We presented the Ukrainians really an incredible, and a historic opportunity," the adviser said, adding that it would be "sustainable" and "the best" security guarantee Ukraine could hope for.

But Zelensky had refused the offer, saying: "I can't sell our state."

Waltz's comments in the White House news briefing came shortly after the conclusion of Zelensky's meeting with Kellogg in Kyiv, after which the Ukrainian leader announced he was ready to make an "investment and security agreement" with the US to end the war in Ukraine.

The meeting was hailed as "productive" by Zelensky - but it more closely resembled an awkward political date.

As the senior members of Donald Trump's team continued to engage directly with Moscow, the retired general had said he was in Kyiv to "listen".

But it soon became apparent he wouldn't speak, publicly that is, after a news conference was cancelled at the last minute.

The BBC understands it was a US decision, with Ukrainian sources claiming they believed Kellogg had been "sidelined" by the White House.

The meeting with Kellogg had been of huge importance to Kyiv, given that officials are relying on the special envoy to relay its needs to Washington.

In a post shared on X, the Ukrainian president said he and the US special envoy had "a detailed conversation about the battlefield situation, how to return our prisoners of war, and effective security guarantees".

He added: "Ukraine is ready for a strong, effective investment and security agreement with the president of the United States."

However, the possible reasons for Mr Kellogg not wanting to face questions are mounting.

Kellogg's meeting comes in the context of a war of words between his boss Donald Trump and Ukraine's leader, which culminated in the US president referring to Zelensky as a "dictator without elections".

Trump also blamed him for starting Russia's invasion.

Now there are reports that the US is refusing to recognise a UN resolution which labels Moscow as the aggressor while recognising Ukraine's territorial integrity.

Earlier this week, Zelensky was excluded from talks between senior Russian and American officials who met in Saudi Arabia to discuss the possibility of ending the conflict.

The war began when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, following its earlier annexation of Ukrainian territory.

Trump, who has been in office for one month, believes US involvement in the war is not in America's interest - and in a radical reversal of previous US foreign policy, he has chosen to negotiate directly with Russia to secure a quick end to the conflict.

On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio emerged after more than four hours of talks with Russian diplomats in Riyadh to declare that the first steps towards negotiations had been agreed, with teams to be formed on both sides.

After the meeting in the Middle East, Trump suggested Zelensky had "started" the war with Russia - claims which led Zelensky to describe the US president as "living in this disinformation space" governed by Moscow.

Trump hit back with his "dictator" attack and claimed Zelensky had low popularity ratings among the Ukrainian electorate.

Looking forward, Ukraine will be concerned by the prospect of Russia-US talks continuing without the direct involvement of Ukraine.

"Nothing is off the negotiating table," claimed US Vice-President JD Vance.

The problem for Ukraine is that it isn't even sitting at it.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqjn74gdwzo
this is completely insane.

yo grant us more returns than we sent you, because we're punishing you for a war you didn't start. good deal, don't ya think.

i want to stress that i think zelensky is being diplomatic when he says it's a disinformation space issue. trump is very clearly realigning with putin.
 
I have found the least important new story :smug:


On Sunday, Kaya Walker announced she was resigning as New York University (NYU) chapter president of the College Republicans of America (CRA).

Walker had described President Donald Trump's 18-year-old son Barron, a student at the university, as "sort of like an oddity on campus" during an interview with Vanity Fair magazine. This was published on February 12, sparking a conservative backlash.

An oddity

How dare she?! :trouble:

Barron was "sort of like an oddity on campus. He goes to class, he goes home."
A quiet freshman :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom