Bozo Erectus
Master Baker
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2003
- Messages
- 22,389
Up until the mid 20th century, American Presidents could serve unlimited terms, as long as they kept getting voted in. But after FDR, this came to be seen as dangerous to democracy, so they were limited to only two terms. After witnessing the harm that one person can do to the country after two consecutive terms, I think the two term rule should be tweaked a little further. How about this: a person can serve two terms, but not consecutively. This would allow there to be a four year period of reflection on the first term. The effects, positive or negative of the first term can be assessed, and a much better decision can be made about whether a second term for that individual would be desirable. What do you think?