RedAlert
Love one another
Yeah, that's why I suggested the knight ride a jaguar instead (which in turn may be just as unlikely as him riding a horse, but I have a feeling most people would prefer the horse)
Sword_Of_Geddon said:Ummm....Jaguars aren't big enough to ride...![]()
Horses are always an option. For example, if the Vikings brought Horses to the New World, and the horses got loose, they would gradually spread across the continent.
A Knight isn't really on my list though, I'm looking for possible future units for the Mesoamericans. Although the Knight(Would diffinitely have another name, I hate using Knight for anything other than the European Unit, as Knights are strictly European...its like giving the Ancient Egyptians Samurai)
Actually, I believe may have been above Eagle Warriors were above Jaguar Warriors in the hierarchy, technically, with Jaguar Warriors being more recon/scout troops (still elite fighters, but more light infantry, fast moving), and "Shorn Ones" being the most formiddable and fearsome, the hardest status to achieve.Sword_Of_Geddon said:Well, theres also the Eagle, in the Aztec military, the warriors were divided in ranks according to animal status. The Eagle Warrior was one of the highest ranks, second only to the Jaguar Warrior. Also, since this is also a Mesoamerican flavor, rather than just Aztec, something based off of the Plumed Serphent, Quezatylcoatl, would be cool as well.
Right you are Shiro. This is why, though Sword of Geddon and many others may disagree, saying "Jaguar Knight" would be perfectly exceptable, since it's a translation anyway. In fact, a good friend of mine, who knows more about Mesoamerica and specifically the Aztecs than anyone could possibly want to, insists on using the term knight, as in "Jaguar Knight" and "Eagle Knight," to describe the different warrior classes of Pre-Columbian Mexico because it is more accurate, more specific, in his mind, than the catch-all "warrior." "Knight" signifies that they are members of an elite fighting order/caste. Note that above I have stuck with the more Civ3-comliant "Eagle Warrior" and "Jaguar Warrior" because I am a lousy conformist.ShiroKobbure said:knight and samurai are the same it is just the warrior class of the middle ages usually on a horse, I dont know what knight means but samurai means man who serves
Llamas don't have the proper temperment to be used as war mounts, I think. It would be very difficult and time-consuming to breed war-worthy mounts out of llamas, before or after importation from the Andes -- much easier and more believeable IMO to just have the Mesoamericans import, steal, or otherwise obtain horses in an alternate history setting. The genus Equus did evolve in the New World after all, it's not like they or total strangers to the Americas.Xen said:theoretically, Ilamas coudl be bred to be large enough to ride- this is what happend, historically, with the horse- they were to small at first to ride (which is why chariots came before horsemen) once they were bred to a size where they were strong enough to hold a man, you have, obviouslly horsemen- I see little reason the same woudl not happen in mesoamercia, given enough tiem for them to develop indipendentlly, and if Ilamms themseklves spread outside of the andes
That's not true, I'm fairly sure the Maya (there may have been others) had the wheel. However, it wasn't very useful for much of anything, as they didn't have any draft animals to pull carts of anything, and people don't make very good draft animals themselves. Andean peoples may have had llamas, but they're pack animals, not draft animals, not much use for pulling carts or (as I mentioned earlier) for riding either. Plus, I'm not sure any Andeans had the wheel.ShiroKobbure said:I wonder why no american civilization ever discorved the wheel