Aquatic
Child of Surprises
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
- Messages
- 93
Bhruic,
in the unlikely event of your not having noticed them, I thought I'd draw your attention to posts 510 and 563 where I make suggestions for (possibly!) improving the readme texts of your two patches. I only offer them and will not be in the least offended if you feel you don't wish to act on them! The first regards a minor typo and the second is a suggestion for a wording that may be clearer for some people (and was later confirmed as clearer by Aslindy who found the original confusing).
The decision as to what to do with my suggestions is, of course, entirely yours. In the meantime, may I repeat my thanks for all your brilliant work?
Not only do I appreciate the actual fixing of the bugs, but I appreciate the fine judgement you excercise in the grey areas - and even if, by chance, I didn't agree with any them I'd still say it's your call as you're doing all the hard work! (Mind you, I know I you'd still listen if I put forward a reasonable argument for a different solution...)
in the unlikely event of your not having noticed them, I thought I'd draw your attention to posts 510 and 563 where I make suggestions for (possibly!) improving the readme texts of your two patches. I only offer them and will not be in the least offended if you feel you don't wish to act on them! The first regards a minor typo and the second is a suggestion for a wording that may be clearer for some people (and was later confirmed as clearer by Aslindy who found the original confusing).
The decision as to what to do with my suggestions is, of course, entirely yours. In the meantime, may I repeat my thanks for all your brilliant work?
