Walking on water vs. Parting water

Better technique?


  • Total voters
    51

Junglecutter

Honorable Delegate
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
341
Location
Singapore
Just came to mind...Which would be a better technique?

Walking on Water or Parting the Water
 
I think parting a sea is a bit more impressive, actually. When you walk on water, there are always going to be those morons who say that you were standing on ice, or submerged rocks, or something like that. When hundreds of feet of water peel back and leave dry land in the middle, it's a lot harder to come up with a natural explanation.

Both are pretty sweet though.
 
Walking on water, because you would be trapped between two walls of water if you part the sea.
 
If you part the water other people can walk through it too. If you walk on water, you're the only one.
 
If you part the sea, your sandals will get stuck in the seabed mud.
 
Parting the sea, you could tour the Titanic on foot, or drive from North America to Europe. :xsmile:
 
Parting water. If you are about to be dunked under water to determine if you are a witch, the ability to part water is more useful than the ability to walk on water.
 
Parting water would be cool, because you can cause tidal waves! :D
 
Parting the water; you could make a lot of money by being a contractor for building canals.
 
Walking on water, as you're not limited to one direction with a single trick.
 
Wouldn't parting the water kill the fishies in it...if so i would prefer walking-fishes are now almost endangered
 
Walking on water. More efficient use of energy to just keep yourself ontop instead of parting millions of tonnes of water.
 
walking on water - there's quite a bunch of places where the ground you'd need to cross after parting the water would be quite the opposite of a comfy highway :lol:
 
Cooler to part the water

But more practical and energy efficient to walk on it
 
Walking on water. Parting it would be nice, but there's a lot of nasty, jagged, slippery rocks on the bottom of a lot of places I'd be walking. And it would ruin the natural scenery.
 
Back
Top Bottom