Fëanor;5370357 said:They could have said that after the First WTC bombing or other terrorist attacks against the US.
But it does not work so easily, the US Government needed something truly or humongous scale to launch their latest wave of Military backed Imperialist attacks. Truly a New Pearl Harbour.
Incredible claims require incredible evidence. Provide some or you look like a conspiracy theorist fool.
Besides, why would we dock HALF OUR BLOODY NAVY in Pearl Harbor if we were going to let it get bombed? Why not a ship here and there? Pre-emptive attack alone would have been more than enough to use as a Casus Belli.
Oh, and we all know how efficient and perfect our government is when it wants to hide something.
Remember, we could not even hide our Iraq troop movements. I severely doubt the gov. could ever hide an operation the size of 9/11, and if it was uncovered...well, let's just say a Republican would not be elected for another 100 years. Not worth the risk just to invade some random countries...oh wait, but Bush REALLY wanted those Afghan opium imports I'm sure. If he was going to link it to Iraq, why not just do it first?Islamic terrorism does exist, it is a threat. Iraq is a debateable debacle, but the threat of Islamic terrorism is not debateable.
I'm not trying to be rude, I just need to see more than baseless claims. They are not even theories in the true sense of the word.
