Marla_Singer
United in diversity
It's always difficult to judge the optimism of commentators. Let's say that the commentators talk more about a Ghanean shot than would do commentators of another country, how could you know that ? You have not seen what was happing on German TV !Rhye said:Italian commentators were quite optimistic.
We all wants to not be influenced by anything, but we are necessarily. We know that Iran wants to devellop the nuclear weapon because the journalists told it to us. Hence they have necessarily an influence on us. Of course we always take a step back towards sources, but you can't chpose what they put in front of your nose, and that has necessarily an effect of yourself. No matter how much we want to think by ourself, we are necessarily influenced.
Now of course, anyone who think of himself that "he knows what footie is" will consider as an insult to recognize his been influenced by commentators. I wasn't expecting you to recognize it. Even Hitro who told he put the sound on mute. Did Hitro chose the angle of the images by himself, did he chose the replays by himself ? No he didn't. Anyway, I will stop this here as I expect you to try to prove in your next post that you definitly cannot be influenced. Recognizing that there's necessarily an outside influence would be some kind of dishonour.