What are your thoughts on BitCoin?

Gold and bitcoins aren't the same thing.

They are not, but in this particular case I think the similarities are strong. Both have value that is largely based on their use an a medium of exchange rather than their intrinsic worth, and the mining of both have a non-trivial environmental impact.
 
That's a big call since gold is seldom used as a medium of exchange. I honestly couldn't tell you what a new laptop would be worth in gold; I'd have to convert the gold price into dollars and back again to figure it out. There's other problems like the fact that gold prices can vary considerably and that gold has clear industrial uses and is geologically quite rare. It's just not a good medium of exchange. It's not even a good store of value either.
 
As far as I can tell, we don't really use bitcoins as a medium of exchange either. You would convert them into a currency if you wanted to use their value store. And yeah, other than the fact that gold can be tranched, I'd say that the analogy with regards to mining is a reasonable one.
 
As far as I can tell, we don't really use bitcoins as a medium of exchange either. You would convert them into a currency if you wanted to use their value store. And yeah, other than the fact that gold can be tranched, I'd say that the analogy with regards to mining is a reasonable one.

Meh. Gold has other uses. Insofar as Bitcoins are useful for managing intercontinental transactions, I don't see how that technology necessitates "mining" a "scarce" "resource." Like a better solution to the problem of international transaction fees couldn't be imagined.

It's mostly an argument against the technocrat-libertarians who say, for example, that Bitcoin is such a sleek, modern take on an old problem. Modern, yeah; sleek, arguably not. And using up so much of that processing power we "should" be using on finding ET or curing cancer or whatever.
 
My main objection against Bitcoin is that the exchanges aren't insured and that you can't easily buy everyday items with them. Despite Zelig saying I can buy groceries and pizza from some obscure place in the Netherlands, I can't buy anything around where I live with Bitcoins and trading Bitcoins for cash is limited on the amount you can trade.

So don't get bitcoins if they're not useful to you - just like any other currency.
 
So don't get bitcoins if they're not useful to you - just like any other currency.

They're not that useful to anyone who wants to buy everyday things without having to fly halfway around the world unlelss you want to buy illegal stuff. You can't buy groceries, gas, or much else with Bitcoin that you need everyday. Each currency is useful in its home country to walk down the street and buy everyday things, BitCoin is not useful like there anywhere.
 
So just like any other currency in all but <1% of countries each?

As I said, each country has its home where its useful, that place is where people spend most of their lives. Bitcoin has that kind of usefulness absolutely nowhere. You can buy everyday needs with Bitcoin anywhere in the world. Its not accepted countrywide anywhere on earth.
 
As I said, each country has its home where its useful, that place is where people spend most of their lives. Bitcoin has that kind of usefulness absolutely nowhere. You can buy everyday needs with Bitcoin anywhere in the world. Its not accepted countrywide anywhere on earth.

It has some usefulness everywhere. Swaziland currency has no usefulness anywhere outside of Swaziland.
 
Swaziland currency has no usefulness anywhere outside of Swaziland.

That's not true. There are currency collectors and people who want to trade for Swaziland currency outside of Swaziland.
 
It has some usefulness everywhere. Swaziland currency has no usefulness anywhere outside of Swaziland.

It has very little usefulness anywhere. Swaziland currency has usefulness in Swaziland, there is no Bitcoinland. If you have Swaziland currency, your probably from Swaziland. It doesn't matter which country your from or spend most of your time in, because Bitcoin is going to be fairly useless in that country to buy everyday things, no matter where you are.
 
That's not true. There are currency collectors and people who want to trade for Swaziland currency outside of Swaziland.

They can be approximated as not existing.

It has very little usefulness anywhere. Swaziland currency has usefulness in Swaziland, there is no Bitcoinland. If you have Swaziland currency, your probably from Swaziland. It doesn't matter which country your from or spend most of your time in, because Bitcoin is going to be fairly useless in that country to buy everyday things, no matter where you are.

Bitcoin has more than 0.00014019346 x the utility of Lilangenis.
 
Usefulness is being able to buy pizza from a different country (specifically netherlands) and being able to order drugs from websites now closely monitored (and probably run) by the fbi.
 
They can be approximated as not existing.

Bitcoins can be approximated as not existing. For example, if people stopped trading in Bitcoins, one pizza shop in the Netherlands would go out of business. If people stopped trading in Swazi currency, that's a whole country with no means to exchange debt.
 
Bitcoins can be approximated as not existing. For example, if people stopped trading in Bitcoins, one pizza shop in the Netherlands would go out of business. If people stopped trading in Swazi currency, that's a whole country with no means to exchange debt.

Which isn't relevant at all to bitcoins being more useful than Lilangenis.
 
Guys don't you know it's all about the Dogecoins now?

so wow
 
Which isn't relevant at all to bitcoins being more useful than Lilangenis.

Well if we're going to start throwing wild unqualified approximations about, then who's to say?
 
Back
Top Bottom