What do you think of Fanfiction?

I understand why oral tradition and copying of older works occurred in history. But the development of true fiction is, relatively speaking, a new experience in literature. I'm not crappy on you guys. I'm supporting my own views. Please don't take this as insulting to you personally. I find the support against my views on ownership to be insulting to creative writers, but no one is defending my position but me.

As for education, yea, Oda, I do have a strong anti-plagiarism streak from it. I did say it may have caused and shaped me into what I am, and I'm not denying that. We are the sum of our experiences, after all. It doesn't make my points any less valid than yours, however.
 
Your experience doesn't make your point of view less valid. It explains where your point of view comes from that's all.

As far as I'm concerned, true fiction is merely continuation of oral tradition, only without the pretense of it being something that really happened. It's a step forward, but not one that necessitate dropping all aspects of oral traditions (otherwise known as throwing the baby out with the bathwater).

As for supportive/unsupportive of writers...*shrugs*. I know quite a few professionally published writers personally. I know for a fact several of them have no objection to fanfiction (because I remember reading theirs back before they were published writers...that, and one of them made a fanfiction writer the main character of their first novel), and I strongly suspect the same applies to many of the others (because they seem to take no issue with the fanficcers among our mutual acquaintances). There are also a number of professionally published authors who are well known to support fanfiction.

It's not an universal rule, of course, and if an author specifically request no fanfiction of their work (and some have), I feel that should be honored. I feel it's a mistake on their part, but it,s theirs to make.

I strongly object, however, to taking offense at fanfiction in the name of people who would be neutral toward it, or even supportive of it. It's their work, their charaters, and their call to make whether or not they object to fanfiction. If they wish to speak up about fanfiction, they will.
 
I am allowed to make these generalizations as much as you are allowed to insult my generalizations. Writing in The Elder Scrolls universe is not original content, even if they pretend it is. Writing in the Civilization universe is a weird apple, though. You can just consider it historical fiction at that point, if you did it well enough. Unless you said the immortal George Washington led the spearmen himself, or something. I don't care too much either way.

I wasn't insulting your generalizations, I was pointing out how the way you use them accounts for your admitted failure to see logic.
 
I wasn't insulting your generalizations, I was pointing out how the way you use them accounts for your admitted failure to see logic.

Failure to see logic? I'm the only person here besides Oda who even recognizes both sides of this debate. I won't tolerate this kind of hateful ignorance and abuse.
 
What debate? You're just spamming your opinion over and over, and your repeatedly stated opinion is that all fanfiction can be lumped together to make your generalizations fit. But it actually has far too much diversity for that to work...a fact you can't tolerate having pointed out, apparently.
 
Failure to see logic? I'm the only person here besides Oda who even recognizes both sides of this debate. I won't tolerate this kind of hateful ignorance and abuse.
You most certainly are not recognizing both sides. You've stated that writing fanfiction means the person will never improve their writing skills, which is utter BS. I've given you numerous examples of people who started out in fanfic and are now successful professional novelists and short story writers who do quite well with their original creations.
 
You most certainly are not recognizing both sides. You've stated that writing fanfiction means the person will never improve their writing skills, which is utter BS. I've given you numerous examples of people who started out in fanfic and are now successful professional novelists and short story writers who do quite well with their original creations.

It occurs to me that making a list of the generalizations made and the examples that prove them false is probably pointless. Perhaps better to just quit feeding this.
 
What debate? You're just spamming your opinion over and over, and your repeatedly stated opinion is that all fanfiction can be lumped together to make your generalizations fit. But it actually has far too much diversity for that to work...a fact you can't tolerate having pointed out, apparently.

I have stated clearly my position and you keep misrepresenting it in your defense. Yes, my stated position is that writing fanfiction in general is a form of lazy writing that does not promote growth as a writer. You're trying to rile me up, but it won't happen. I refuse to be angry with fellow writers, even if they do art I do not support or find useful. I came here to state my views, and have. You are choosing to slap back with no substantial argument besides "you don't know fanfiction."

You most certainly are not recognizing both sides. You've stated that writing fanfiction means the person will never improve their writing skills, which is utter BS. I've given you numerous examples of people who started out in fanfic and are now successful professional novelists and short story writers who do quite well with their original creations.

I said fanfiction is lazy and weakens the writer. I never said it makes you a poor writer, only that it isn't a great tool for developing yourself as a writer. You, again, are taking my words and twisting them to fit your own defenses. I can give you numerous examples of musicians who become actors, that doesn't make it the norm. Stop trying to point out a handful of people who are the exception to the rule as being the rule. In general, fanfiction writers do not become anything more than fanfiction writers and in general they never challenge themselves beyond fanfiction. Original fiction writers do challenge themselves, and they may never be published for it, but at least they were writing their own settings, characters, and plots.

I apologize you two are so deep in the fanfiction circles that you're incapable of seeing my point of view without lashing out. I have not raised my voice or looked down on you. I have told you the truth. I would prefer it if you'd stop telling lies on what I've said. Obviously this thread was created for fanfiction lovers, and thus the prompted question isn't a question at all. Obviously alternative views are unwelcome here. I will leave you to it. You should know there are not many people as tolerant or genuinely friendly as me when it comes to this divide, of writing and the craft in particular. By being hateful towards me, by lashing out, by putting words in my mouth in defense of your chosen method of writing without recognizing mine, you have only caused a greater rift between communities. I dislike conflict. So I refuse to be part of it any longer. I'm not banging my head against a brick wall to see if it budges. I've got writing to do.
 
I like fanfiction as a way of seeing how other people interpret certain characters in a story. Everybody comes into a work of fiction with their own lens, background, and catalog of experiences through which they are going to interpret the story and its characters. In that sense I find it interesting.

To give an example a few months ago I started reading various post-Hogwarts Harry Potter fanfiction and it was absolutely fascinating the way various people interpreted (or in some cases clearly misinterpreted/misrepresented) the various characters of the HP universe to suit their own needs. In one story Harry turns into an angsty depressed wreck because the author interpreted him as a bearing the world on his shoulders, another took the canon fiery/independent Ginny and turned her into a disgusting, unreadable twee mess while Harry was suddenly transformed into a Mary Sue perfect wizard who could do anything and everything. Sometimes it's a form of comedy in that the author just plain reads the character in a totally strange seemingly apocryphal way, sometimes it's clear the author is working through some very personal stuff through these characters they're clearly passionate about, and sometimes the author can give you a totally different perspective on a character that you'd never considered before. Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality was interesting from that perspective (and from various other people-watching-related perspectives). One fanfiction I read gave a slightly alternative to JK Rowling's canon of Ginny and Harry just kind of falling together as if by destiny after book 7 and instead that perhaps Ginny would want to do things for herself and be independent rather than just shackling herself to Harry at age 18 and never really escaping from his shadow. That's an interesting take on the relationship that I don't think I would have ever considered.

I can absolutely see where Lucky is coming from. To write fanfiction in some senses is to chain yourself to a set of rules. The other problem is that fanfiction is often associated with Mary Sue-dom and raw wish fulfillment. Admittedly when I read fanfiction I don't do so because I'm seeking out a great work of art or good prose or an artful story. A lot of fanfiction is very poorly written (definitely not all; there is some exceedingly well-written stuff out there). At the same time a fundamental aspect of modern literary theory is that the author does not "own" their universe, nor its characters in an intellectual sense. There is no "correct" reading of a character or story. An author can have his or her own opinion about the characters in their book, and that opinion will almost certainly hold a great deal of weight among fans of that piece of art, but that interpretation is not the end all be all. Ultimately the character and the story rest in the hands of the audience, and I think that fanfiction is a celebration of this axiom. That so many people can all read the same story and yet take completely different concepts, notions, and interpretations away from it is the strength of the medium.

So I guess I like fanfiction more in a people-watching/social experiment/interpretation sense than an actual interest in quality of writing or story.
 
I have stated clearly my position and you keep misrepresenting it in your defense. Yes, my stated position is that writing fanfiction in general is a form of lazy writing that does not promote growth as a writer. You're trying to rile me up, but it won't happen. I refuse to be angry with fellow writers, even if they do art I do not support or find useful. I came here to state my views, and have. You are choosing to slap back with no substantial argument besides "you don't know fanfiction."
You never did answer my question of how much you've actually read, or if you bothered with the short video I posted. By this I conclude you haven't actually read that much and are posting from the vantage of your nose firmly pointing up.

I said fanfiction is lazy and weakens the writer. I never said it makes you a poor writer, only that it isn't a great tool for developing yourself as a writer. You, again, are taking my words and twisting them to fit your own defenses. I can give you numerous examples of musicians who become actors, that doesn't make it the norm. Stop trying to point out a handful of people who are the exception to the rule as being the rule. In general, fanfiction writers do not become anything more than fanfiction writers and in general they never challenge themselves beyond fanfiction. Original fiction writers do challenge themselves, and they may never be published for it, but at least they were writing their own settings, characters, and plots.
Way to deliberately miss the point. First, you don't get to dictate what I can and cannot post here.

Second, musicians becoming actors is not the same as amateur writers becoming professional writers. Musicians becoming composers is the example you should have gone for to make it comparable.

Third, I may have named only a few names, but the ones I named are among the cream of the crop of those who started in fanfic but went on to become pro. There are many more I did not name, including a whole slew of people who got their start because of Marion Zimmer Bradley mentoring them from their fanfic days to their early days as anthology contributors to becoming full-fledged writers in their own original universes.

Fourth, you are making the assumption that all fanfic writers want to be professionals. You need to understand that while there are probably a lot who do, there are even more who view writing fanfic as a hobby - a creative hobby like any other creative hobby that's enjoyable and produces an end product that other people enjoy, and that's all it's ever meant to be.

One of my favorite fanfic writers specializes in Chakotay/Seven of Nine fanfic (source material: Star Trek: Voyager). I enjoy her stories, and she has quite a following on fanfiction.net. But considering that she's a university student in the UK, who is studying Mandarin and other courses to do with Asian studies, I doubt that becoming a professional fiction writer is among her immediate goals. For her, this is a hobby.

Actually, I'm reminded of the scene in I, Claudius where Empress Messalina competes with the head of the Guild of Prostitutes to see "who can wear out the most men in one night." Scylla tells the onlookers who are mocking her: "The difference between this great lady and myself is that my profession is her hobby. My hobby happens to be gardening, for which I don't expect to be paid."

Not that I'm saying fanfic writers are prostitutes(!), but you hopefully get the idea that one person's profession can be another person's hobby.

Fifth, I'm not trying to rile you up. I'm trying for an honest discussion without you sticking your nose in the air, your fingers in your ears, and chanting, "LALALALALALALA, I'm not listening, my mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts!"

I apologize you two are so deep in the fanfiction circles that you're incapable of seeing my point of view without lashing out. I have not raised my voice or looked down on you. I have told you the truth. I would prefer it if you'd stop telling lies on what I've said. Obviously this thread was created for fanfiction lovers, and thus the prompted question isn't a question at all. Obviously alternative views are unwelcome here. I will leave you to it. You should know there are not many people as tolerant or genuinely friendly as me when it comes to this divide, of writing and the craft in particular. By being hateful towards me, by lashing out, by putting words in my mouth in defense of your chosen method of writing without recognizing mine, you have only caused a greater rift between communities. I dislike conflict. So I refuse to be part of it any longer. I'm not banging my head against a brick wall to see if it budges. I've got writing to do.
Luckymoose, that has to be one of the most sanctimonious, most offensive things anyone has ever said to me in this forum.

NOBODY has to apologize for me. If I need to apologize for something i said, I'm quite capable of recognizing that, and doing it for myself.

And yes, you damn well have looked down on us, by tarring us with your "writing fanfiction makes you a weak writer" brush. Did my playing and adapting various waltzes and polkas make me a weak organist? Did it prevent me from composing my own original pieces?

NO, IT DID NOT.

What it did do, and what writing fanfic does, is provide inspiration for practice. The only way a writer gets good is by actually writing, and fanfic is as good a source/inspiration for practice as anything else. It's not the fact that Person X is writing a Star Trek story that's important, it's that Person X is learning to plot, write dialogue, develop characters, write descriptively, and so on. All of these are essential skills for any writer to know.

It is really damned presumptuous of you to claim that a fanfic writer can never learn these skills just because they're learned via fanfic.

I like fanfiction as a way of seeing how other people interpret certain characters in a story. Everybody comes into a work of fiction with their own lens, background, and catalog of experiences through which they are going to interpret the story and its characters. In that sense I find it interesting.

To give an example a few months ago I started reading various post-Hogwarts Harry Potter fanfiction and it was absolutely fascinating the way various people interpreted (or in some cases clearly misinterpreted/misrepresented) the various characters of the HP universe to suit their own needs. In one story Harry turns into an angsty depressed wreck because the author interpreted him as a bearing the world on his shoulders, another took the canon fiery/independent Ginny and turned her into a disgusting, unreadable twee mess while Harry was suddenly transformed into a Mary Sue perfect wizard who could do anything and everything. Sometimes it's a form of comedy in that the author just plain reads the character in a totally strange seemingly apocryphal way, sometimes it's clear the author is working through some very personal stuff through these characters they're clearly passionate about, and sometimes the author can give you a totally different perspective on a character that you'd never considered before. Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality was interesting from that perspective (and from various other people-watching-related perspectives). One fanfiction I read gave a slightly alternative to JK Rowling's canon of Ginny and Harry just kind of falling together as if by destiny after book 7 and instead that perhaps Ginny would want to do things for herself and be independent rather than just shackling herself to Harry at age 18 and never really escaping from his shadow. That's an interesting take on the relationship that I don't think I would have ever considered.

I can absolutely see where Lucky is coming from. To write fanfiction in some senses is to chain yourself to a set of rules. The other problem is that fanfiction is often associated with Mary Sue-dom and raw wish fulfillment. Admittedly when I read fanfiction I don't do so because I'm seeking out a great work of art or good prose or an artful story. A lot of fanfiction is very poorly written (definitely not all; there is some exceedingly well-written stuff out there). At the same time a fundamental aspect of modern literary theory is that the author does not "own" their universe, nor its characters in an intellectual sense. There is no "correct" reading of a character or story. An author can have his or her own opinion about the characters in their book, and that opinion will almost certainly hold a great deal of weight among fans of that piece of art, but that interpretation is not the end all be all. Ultimately the character and the story rest in the hands of the audience, and I think that fanfiction is a celebration of this axiom. That so many people can all read the same story and yet take completely different concepts, notions, and interpretations away from it is the strength of the medium.

So I guess I like fanfiction more in a people-watching/social experiment/interpretation sense than an actual interest in quality of writing or story.
There are not many times when I've wholly approved of a post of yours, but this is one.

Most of my fanfic is in The Crow: Stairway to Heaven universe. My take on those characters differs greatly from most other Crow: STH fanfic I've seen. I started writing fanfic for that series before it was even half through its initial run on TV, and I recall being annoyed at how canon shredded some of what I thought were good stories. But I threw out (figuratively) what no longer fit, and adapted the rest to what was possible and what was plausible. In some cases it gave me ideas I never could have had otherwise. I'm Canadian and the Vietnam War isn't something that's part of my country's collective psyche, so linking it to the series never occurred to me. But after the episode "Brother's Keeper" in which we learn that Eric Draven was a war orphan adopted by an American soldier and his wife, a whole other batch of ideas started coming.
 
First, Marion Zimmer Bradley was a pedophile and child abuser and I do not want to discuss her in this thread or ever again. It disgusts me that people still support her work. Secondly, I never said the goal of a writer was to become professional. I said the goal of a writer is to improve, and fanfiction offers a crutch. You can't learn to walk if you never try. Thirdly, I disagree that the audience has the right to interpret the meaning of a story or character. The only person who knows what a story is about is the person writing it, and you must listen to what they say because you were not involved in the mental process of thinking through character action or plot points. Making wild assumptions about character is wish fulfillment. Fourthly, I do not read much fanfiction, though I have read some over the years, because there is a limited amount of material I can work through in my life and I'd rather spend it on original fiction. I do not have enough time on this earth to waste it reading Star Trek or Harry Potter Mary Sues.

I'm seriously done, now. I can't continue to be involved in a discussion with people who support Bradley.
 
First, Marion Zimmer Bradley was a pedophile and child abuser and I do not want to discuss her in this thread or ever again. It disgusts me that people still support her work. Secondly, I never said the goal of a writer was to become professional. I said the goal of a writer is to improve, and fanfiction offers a crutch. You can't learn to walk if you never try. Thirdly, I disagree that the audience has the right to interpret the meaning of a story or character. The only person who knows what a story is about is the person writing it, and you must listen to what they say because you were not involved in the mental process of thinking through character action or plot points. Making wild assumptions about character is wish fulfillment. Fourthly, I do not read much fanfiction, though I have read some over the years, because there is a limited amount of material I can work through in my life and I'd rather spend it on original fiction. I do not have enough time on this earth to waste it reading Star Trek or Harry Potter Mary Sues.

I'm seriously done, now. I can't continue to be involved in a discussion with people who support Bradley.

I am so glad you came back to clarify...somehow your opinion was much easier to understand the seventeenth time you repeated it.
 
First, Marion Zimmer Bradley was a pedophile and child abuser and I do not want to discuss her in this thread or ever again. It disgusts me that people still support her work.

Her actions have no bearing on the quality of her works or her talent as a writer. They justify boycotting her (because, quite frankly, she doesn't deserve my money); they most certainly justify condemning her, but pretending someone's work is awful or unworthy of discussion because of issues unrelated to that work is a mistake too often made.

It's not only that, it's also counter-productive. By saying her work is anathema, you actively encourage the people who like her work to go on the defensive and question the accusations (because otherwise they'd have to feel bad about ever liking the works), instead of getting them to separate the work (which they like, and that's their right) and the person (and the condemnation that person deserve).

Her books didn't abuse anyone. She did.

You can't learn to walk if you never try.

Most people learn to crawl before they learn to walk.

Thirdly, I disagree that the audience has the right to interpret the meaning of a story or character.

I used to agree with this; and I was completely in the wrong. What you,re doing is denying the very nature of writing: a form of communication.

Communication can never be a one way street. In fact, because the ultimate goal of communication is to transmit knowledge, emotion or ideas to the audience (eg, to make the audience hear these things), what the audience hears, not what the communicator say, is what communication is about. What you intend to say matters only to the extent that it colors what you actually say, and what you actually say matters to the extent of how the audience understands you.

What you're saying amount to saying that a person has no right to understand something differently than you intended them to. It's a position that, even if it was morally defensible, and it's not, would be ridiculously impractical. Fundamentally, people have the right to interpret what you attempt to communicate in a way different than what you intended. Sometime their interpretation will be a mistake (as in, it won't make sense). Sometime their interpretation will be reasonable, but not the one you intended (as in it makes perfect sense, it just isn't what you meant). And sometime their interpretation will go deeper than your own initial thought process, and reveal points that you hadn't even considered but that you actually agree with in hindsight.

In all events, their interpretation will be something they're entitled to.
 
So, back to the topic, or something close to it...

Fan fiction is a very diverse thing. All that I've written has been game based, rather than book or film based. Most of what I have read has also been game based. I'm not saying game based fan fiction is better, but apparently it suits my tastes.

My taste also runs to things that are far removed from the original source. I mentioned a story set in the Arcane University from the Elder Scrolls universe. To me the writing of that story is no different from writing any other kind of fiction. The writer held true to the source material, but the story itself was nothing anyone would run across in the game.

If you write historical fiction set in colonial America you are somewhat required to be authentic to the times. If Ben Franklin passes through and interacts with your characters you can't portray him as a tory unless you do some explaining. Your character can't get snowed in in a cabin in Florida.

If you write a law enforcement suspense story set in New York City, again you have to be authentic to the setting. If your character travels from Manhattan to Jersey in the afternoon they better hit traffic. If they visit the Statue of Liberty she better be holding a torch.

Even the furthest excursions into fantasy or science fiction are seldom totally creation. Seldom does science fiction ignore the basic rules of physics without at least a sketchy explanation, for example (yes warp drive, I'm looking at you!).

So I guess I'm different from Owen Glyndwr who likes the different interpretations and what they reveal about the writer. I look more for a good story. Fan fiction allows for short good stories because the complexities of the setting to some extent can be delivered in a sort of short hand. So when I'm looking for a quick read to kill a few minutes to an hour I tend to look at fan fiction. If I have ample time I read a book.
 
First, Marion Zimmer Bradley was a pedophile and child abuser and I do not want to discuss her in this thread or ever again. It disgusts me that people still support her work.
O-kay, this has really gone too far. Seriously.

I became aware of MZB's situation when SF author Stephen Goldin spammed one of the Yahoo SF groups I belong to, to promote reprints of some of his books from the '70s, and he proceeded to crucify MZB both publicly and in an email exchange I had with him when I told him he'd behaved inappropriately in the first place.

My understanding is this: MZB's husband was the pedophile. MZB did look the other way, yes, and current society judges her harshly for that. Her husband died in prison as far as I know, and MZB herself has been dead for many years. The last dozen or so Darkover books have been written (or co-written) by Mercedes Lackey, Deborah J. Ross, and others. I certainly hope you don't plan to tar all of these other authors with the same brush, as in guilt by association!

Whatever her private life, MZB was a damn good writer, and without her encouragement of younger writers (particularly female writers), the SF & F field would be much poorer now. And keep in mind that if we shun all works by all people with less-than-stellar private lives, we'd be reduced to very slim cultural pickings, indeed.

And here's a snipped of information: If MZB had not lived where she did back in the mid-60s and had the literary interests she did, I would never have come to CFC. One other thing MZB did was to be a founding member of the Society for Creative Anachronism, which started in 1966 and is still going strong today. I read about the SCA in some of the Authors' Notes in her books, and it sounded intriguing. When I found out Red Deer had a branch, I had to find out what it was like, and spent the next 12 years learning all kinds of fascinating stuff about history and life in the years 600-1600 AD. There's a strong crossover in the SCA with people who are into SF and technology and gaming. It was two local SCA members who taught me to play CivI and CivII - I'd never have learned otherwise, nor even heard of the game, and so would never have heard of CFC.

Secondly, I never said the goal of a writer was to become professional. I said the goal of a writer is to improve, and fanfiction offers a crutch. You can't learn to walk if you never try.
HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY IT: SOME NOW-PRO AUTHORS WROTE FANFIC AS PART OF THEIR TRAINING, PRACTICE, APPRENTICESHIP, ETC. BEFORE GOING ON TO CREATE THEIR OWN 100% ORIGINAL WORKS? These authors have nothing to be ashamed of for having written fanfic.

Thirdly, I disagree that the audience has the right to interpret the meaning of a story or character. The only person who knows what a story is about is the person writing it, and you must listen to what they say because you were not involved in the mental process of thinking through character action or plot points. Making wild assumptions about character is wish fulfillment.
Nonsense. If the audience has no right to interpret the meaning of a story or character, why bother reading it in the first place? Literature isn't like math or physics; there is no absolute right or wrong interpretation when it comes to fiction.

Fourthly, I do not read much fanfiction, though I have read some over the years, because there is a limited amount of material I can work through in my life and I'd rather spend it on original fiction. I do not have enough time on this earth to waste it reading Star Trek or Harry Potter Mary Sues.
You have a very limited understanding of what is involved in fanfic, then. Just a couple of days ago I found an excellent story that explores the inner thoughts and feelings of Antonia, mother of the future Emperor Claudius, as she sits outside the locked room of the Imperial Palace where her traitorous daughter, Livilla, is to die by dehydration/starvation for her part in Sejanus' plot to overthrow Tiberius. It's a very well-written character study, and completely true to the characters as shown on TV and in Robert Graves' novel.

I'm seriously done, now. I can't continue to be involved in a discussion with people who support Bradley.
Am I to consider this your withdrawal from any future Iron Pen competitions? I assure you that I conduct them with 100% neutrality, but if you don't wish any future interaction, please say so.

Her actions have no bearing on the quality of her works or her talent as a writer. They justify boycotting her (because, quite frankly, she doesn't deserve my money); they most certainly justify condemning her, but pretending someone's work is awful or unworthy of discussion because of issues unrelated to that work is a mistake too often made.

It's not only that, it's also counter-productive. By saying her work is anathema, you actively encourage the people who like her work to go on the defensive and question the accusations (because otherwise they'd have to feel bad about ever liking the works), instead of getting them to separate the work (which they like, and that's their right) and the person (and the condemnation that person deserve).

Her books didn't abuse anyone. She did.
Was MZB ever convicted of child abuse or other crimes?

Communication can never be a one way street. In fact, because the ultimate goal of communication is to transmit knowledge, emotion or ideas to the audience (eg, to make the audience hear these things), what the audience hears, not what the communicator say, is what communication is about. What you intend to say matters only to the extent that it colors what you actually say, and what you actually say matters to the extent of how the audience understands you.

What you're saying amount to saying that a person has no right to understand something differently than you intended them to. It's a position that, even if it was morally defensible, and it's not, would be ridiculously impractical. Fundamentally, people have the right to interpret what you attempt to communicate in a way different than what you intended. Sometime their interpretation will be a mistake (as in, it won't make sense). Sometime their interpretation will be reasonable, but not the one you intended (as in it makes perfect sense, it just isn't what you meant). And sometime their interpretation will go deeper than your own initial thought process, and reveal points that you hadn't even considered but that you actually agree with in hindsight.
Yep. Makes me wonder what would happen if Luckymoose were to someday be appointed Minister of Culture in some hypothetical future Canadian Parliament.

Fan fiction is a very diverse thing. All that I've written has been game based, rather than book or film based. Most of what I have read has also been game based. I'm not saying game based fan fiction is better, but apparently it suits my tastes.
Fanfic covers a vast tapestry of tastes. I'm not familiar with the non-Civ material you posted on fanfiction.net, but evidently there are a lot of people who are. Likewise, one of my current projects involves Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, which is not most peoples' cup of tea.

Even the furthest excursions into fantasy or science fiction are seldom totally creation. Seldom does science fiction ignore the basic rules of physics without at least a sketchy explanation, for example (yes warp drive, I'm looking at you!).
Sometimes pro writers ignore the basic rules of physics and if they get called on it by a reader, Kevin J. Anderson will call that reader a "Talifan." :thumbsdown:

So I guess I'm different from Owen Glyndwr who likes the different interpretations and what they reveal about the writer. I look more for a good story. Fan fiction allows for short good stories because the complexities of the setting to some extent can be delivered in a sort of short hand. So when I'm looking for a quick read to kill a few minutes to an hour I tend to look at fan fiction. If I have ample time I read a book.
The thing about fanfic is that it doesn't have to be shoehorned into the publisher's restrictions as to length. The story can be a few hundred words, or one of the epic dozens-of-chapters stories I enjoy by a couple of Star Trek: Voyager fanfic authors.
 
Yep. Makes me wonder what would happen if Luckymoose were to someday be appointed Minister of Culture in some hypothetical future Canadian Parliament.

He'd arrest the medias for not understanding him right.

Was MZB ever convicted of child abuse or other crimes?

The statement was more focused on the books not having done anything and having nothing to do with whatever else she may or may not have done. I'm not well-versed enough to know what she was or was not convicted of, or accused (in the informal sense) of. That said, as a general rule of thumb, given how hard it is to come forward with that kind of story, my tendency is to believe that the balance of probability favors their accusations being true (though evidence can certainly reverse my views). (The justice system has more exacting standards, and with good reason).
 
The statement was more focused on the books not having done anything and having nothing to do with whatever else she may or may not have done. I'm not well-versed enough to know what she was or was not convicted of, or accused (in the informal sense) of. That said, as a general rule of thumb, given how hard it is to come forward with that kind of story, my tendency is to believe that the balance of probability favors their accusations being true (though evidence can certainly reverse my views). (The justice system has more exacting standards, and with good reason).
Oda Nobunaga said:
Her actions have no bearing on the quality of her works or her talent as a writer. They justify boycotting her (because, quite frankly, she doesn't deserve my money); they most certainly justify condemning her, but pretending someone's work is awful or unworthy of discussion because of issues unrelated to that work is a mistake too often made.

It's not only that, it's also counter-productive. By saying her work is anathema, you actively encourage the people who like her work to go on the defensive and question the accusations (because otherwise they'd have to feel bad about ever liking the works), instead of getting them to separate the work (which they like, and that's their right) and the person (and the condemnation that person deserve).

Her books didn't abuse anyone. She did.
So you're condemning her on hearsay and speculation. Gotcha.

The article I read was pretty damning re her husband. But there wasn't a shred of proof that MZB actively abused anyone. During those years, she was busy writing anything that would bring money in to the household, as she had a son to support, and by her own admission in the Author's Notes in the paperback omnibus of The Planet Savers/Sword of Aldones, some of what she wrote and sold was pretty bad, including an astrology column and the same kinds of formula romance stories she'd always despised herself. But it paid the bills.

Now please excuse me while I complete my Amazon order for the latest Darkover anthology, edited by, and containing stories by, numerous of her writing proteges over the years. Whatever MZB's private life may have been, I know these will be good stories that will entertain me.
 
I condemn her on just the "turned a blind eye" part. That much I already knew, and you admit to it. It's more than enough.

Like I said, I'd rather be wrong about accusing MZB of child abuse than be wrong about accusing a child abuse victim of lying. I won't go around crusading against her over it, because I recognize my opinion is founded on nothing more than a general belief in the victims. It's enough to call her an abuser when the topic of her and abuse comes up directly; but beyond that, not so much.

As to the boycott, it was a general statement: boycotting someone because you're morally outraged at something they did is fair. Even if what they did isn't directly related to the thing you're boycotting. It's just a sstatement of "you don't deserve my money". (For example: I'm boycotting Orson Scott Card these days because of some of his statements about homosexuality and gay marriage).

In this specific case, there just wouldn't be much of a point to it, because she's dead and she wouldn't be getting my money. Heck, it's entirely possible that her royalties are going to her children, aka the *victims* in all this, which would make a boycott more than pointless. Plus as you note, the other authors who have done absolutely nothing to warrant a boycott.
 
I could condemn her on just the "turned a blind eye" part and that would be enough for everything I said.

As to the rest: like I said, I'd rather be wrong about accusing MZB of child abuse than be wrong about accusing a child abuse victim of lying. If there's a middle ground here, I have yet to find it, and of the two evil I'll go with the one that encourages actual victims to come forward with their stories.

As to the boycott, it was a general statement: boycotting someone because you're morally outraged at something they did is fair. Even if what they did isn't directly related to the thing you're boycotting. It's just a sstatement of "you don't deserve my money". (For example: I'm boycotting Orson Scott Card these days because of some of his statements about homosexuality and gay marriage).

In this specific case, there just wouldn't be much of a point to it, because she's dead and she wouldn't be getting my money. Heck, it's entirely possible that her royalties are going to her children, aka the *victims* in all this, which would make a boycott more than pointless. Plus as you note, the other authors who have done absolutely nothing to warrant a boycott.
I'm not saying boycotts are wrong; I'm boycotting Orson Scott Card too, but for different reasons. He was rude to me at a science fiction convention, back in 1983. Yes, I hold grudges for a long time. But at least my boycott is for something I know he did, and can prove since I still have the book he autographed with inappropriate language. It would be irrational for me to boycott him because his relative, Dr. Brigham Young Card, who was my sociology instructor in college at that time, called me into his office and tried to convert me to Mormonism.

So by all means, boycott MZB. I think you're missing out on some good stories (plus the later material written by Deborah J. Ross), but it's your choice to condemn her without proof.

Any proven victims here are those victimized by her husband. Without proof, it's inappropriate to refer to them as MZB's victims. As for children, she only had one son, David Bradley. If he'd been one of her second husband's victims, I'm sure Stephen Goldin would have pointed that out to me with glee, but he didn't say a word on that score.
 
Back
Top Bottom