What has this Judge done wrong ?

[MobBoss]

Your point was that the brisk sales are proof that the subject is not mainstream. Let me know when you make up your mind on the correlation between sales volume and mainstreaminess.

I didnt think I needed to explain it to you. I guess I gave you too much credit in grasping the difference in '50 shades of grey' and the bible.

How has her ability to do her job been compromised?

For one as she is a family lawyer, it brings into question her ability to rule on cases involved infidelity/adultery since she is herself apparently an adulterer open to having 3 some sex.

And fwiw, I really cant believe you are even arguing about this. Arent you a member of the bar there in Texas? How do you think they would act on a case like this?

How does an act done between consenting spouses create a conflict of interest or bias when judging a claim of infidility? A motion for recusal would not be granted there.

According to the story, it involved more than just her spouse.

 

[JollyRoger]

For one as she is a family lawyer, it brings into question her ability to rule on cases involved infidelity/adultery since she is herself apparently an adulterer open to having 3 some sex.

And fwiw, I really cant believe you are even arguing about this. Arent you a member of the bar there in Texas? How do you think they would act on a case like this?

In a divorce case, the issue would be infidility, not consensual actions that both spouses participate in. A motion for recusal would not get honored in Texas in a case like this.

I mean wouldn't someone with a missionary-only sex life have a potential bias against the cheater in a divorce case? Should there be a moton to recuse there?

As to it involving more than just her spouse - it was still not infidelity - she had spousal encouragement.

 

[otago]

Uh, it was a bit more than just 'missionary' style sex. From the link:



I guess someone read '50 Shades of Grey' and liked it.

I'd say it would be hard to command the proper respect in court once your pics are out there on a porn site.

LOL Mobby, I was taking a female police officer out when in Sydney and police handcuffs can be fun along with oral sex.
Oral sex not mainstream, hmm, yes it would not be mainstream among the hard right religious to whom sex is for procreation only and not for fun.
Oh, the photos were taken in 2002, a bit before 50 shades of gray came out.
A judge having a normal sex life, nope cannot have them on the bench.

 

[JollyRoger]

If you are spanking your kids and yelling at your wife instead of spanking your wife and yelling at your kids, you are doing it wrong.

 

[MobBoss]

LOL Mobby, I was taking a female police officer out when in Sydney and police handcuffs can be fun along with oral sex.
Oral sex not mainstream, hmm, yes it would not be mainstream among the hard right religious to whom sex is for procreation only and not for fun.
Oh, the photos were taken in 2002, a bit before 50 shades of gray came out.
A judge having a normal sex life, nope cannot have them on the bench.

Otago, the whips and chains and 3 some sex is not mainstream. Feel free to argue that it is, and good luck with that.

 

[JollyRoger]

Whips and chans and multiple partners have been mainstream since the Old Testament.

 

[MobBoss]

Whips and chans and multiple partners have been mainstream since the Old Testament.

Nope.

 

[otago]

Otago, the whips and chains and 3 some sex is not mainstream. Feel free to argue that it is, and good luck with that.

Threesome sex, me and two women, yep been there, all three of us had a lot of fun.
Fair enough in your world you live by what you believe the bible wants, but we liberal types tend to go with the maxim enjoy yourself, but make sure no one gets hurt.

 

[JollyRoger]

Nope.

Whips:

http://concordances.org/hebrew/7752.htm

http://concordances.org/hebrew/3256.htm

http://concordances.org/hebrew/6137.htm

http://concordances.org/greek/2438.htm

Chains:

http://biblez.com/searchstrongs.php?q=chains

Multiple partners:

http://www.rickbeckman.org/men-of-the-bible-with-multiple-wives/

 

[MobBoss]

Threesome sex, me and two women, yep been there, all three of us had a lot of fun.
Fair enough in your world you live by what you believe the bible wants, but we liberal types tend to go with the maxim enjoy yourself, but make sure no one gets hurt.

Just because you do it doesnt make it 'mainstream'.

And please dont assume I dont have a great sex life and I wont make any such assumptions about you...deal?

@Jolly. Although I am happy to force you into bible study, you must never forget context!!

 

[JollyRoger]

Just because you do it doesnt make it 'mainstream'.

And please dont assume I dont have a great sex life and I wont make any such assumptions about you...deal?

Assuming you have a great sex life, should that disqualify you in deciding property divisions of divorcing spouses who do not?

@Jolly. Although I am happy to force you into bible study, you must never forget context!!

Sure, context is important - this thread is a great example - some are taking an adventurous sex life out of its consensual context and equating it with infidility.

 

[ParkCungHee]

Whips and Chains aren't mainstream?
I always thought they qualified as boring.

 

[JollyRoger]

Whips and chains aren't necessarily boring - just something that you revert to when you want to get back to the basics.

 

[ParkCungHee]

True. Or something that can be built off of for new directions.

 

[Dumanios]

Given that this judge had pictures taken at her consent, means she should've thought of the possibility of them on the web. The fact she's raising a big fit over it will likely lead to people seeing these pictures because of the Streisand Effect.

 

[JollyRoger]

Raising a big fit? She recused herself pending the somewhat-related accusations in the complaint being cleared up.

 

[Formaldehyde]

Given that this judge had pictures taken at her consent, means she should've thought of the possibility of them on the web. The fact she's raising a big fit over it will likely lead to people seeing these pictures because of the Streisand Effect.

Only it happened long before she became a judge, and the photos were removed from the website long aqo. The guy who just brought it all up again was even paid $25K in a settlement to delete them from his PC.

I really don't understand the big deal. Judges are human and have different and varied sex lives too. Who knew?

 

[MobBoss]

Assuming you have a great sex life, should that disqualify you in deciding property divisions of divorcing spouses who do not?

I'm not a judge.

 

[JollyRoger]

I'm not a judge.

Given your great sex life, I can see why.

 

[MobBoss]

Given your great sex life, I can see why.

Well, since you have no idea what my sex life is like, your jab is rather flaccid. Didnt you have this talk with your dad at some point?