What ordinary men can do: The bombing of Hiroshima

Nobody said:
i dont remeber america sneak attacking japan to start the war.
After all, Germans have sneak attacked Belgium in World War 1. That makes suddenly the Versailles Treaty justified. :rolleyes:

Come on Nobody, you can't consider that everything is excusable because 2 guys and 1 dog died during the bombing of a Pacific island on the December 7th of 1941. My point is certainly not to minimize Pearl Harbor, the thing is that you can't compare apples with carrots. It's completely different.

Actually, what scares me in your comment is that it sounds as if Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a revenge of Pearl Harbor. :(

Anyway, it's pointless to discuss about the past. Humans always repeat their mistakes after all. There's no reason it will change.
 
BasketCase said:
That's the thing--Japan was NOT about to surrender. Before the nukes, the Japanese leadership was planning to fight to the death.


For them, the death was EXTREMELY close.
 
The bombs took less lives than the invasion would've. And if you're one of the people that feel all war is evil, why do you consider a smaller loss of life a bigger war crime than a larger loss of life?

...and why argue sixty years after the fact
 
Japanrocks12 said:
For them, the death was EXTREMELY close.
Closer than you realize. At least one of Hirohito's cabinet committed suicide rather than agree to Japan's surrender.

It took nuclear war--the destruction of their empire, from afar--to convince them to surrender. It took the realization that they would not get a chance to fight to the death. They would simply die, without ever getting a chance to swing a sword or shoot a gun at the enemy. That's what it took.


Edit: I should probably also add that this mindset was not exclusive to the Japanese military. Most Japanese civilians were terrified that American soldiers would kill them all on sight. So terrified, in fact, that Japanese civilians on the outlying islands frequently committed suicide when faced with capture by Americans. The popular myth is that the Japanese goverment told them this (everybody loves to blame government propaganda for stuff), but I think Japan's own culture was more to blame; they probably expected Americans to fight the way Japanese did.
 
BasketCase said:
Closer than you realize. At least one of Hirohito's cabinet committed suicide rather than agree to Japan's surrender.
That's not so surprising. Goebbels has done the same in Germany. He did even worse than the General Anami since Goebbels hasn't committed suicide alone. Indeed, his wife killed their 6 children before she also committed suicide. So as you can see, Germans were also freaks... but it hasn't cost the life of millions of US soldiers to invade it.

PS : For a minute I have even forgotten to mention that Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun also committed suicide ! Gosh it was a real suicidal party in this bunker...
 
Agreed. The German mindset was very different from that of Japan. The minute we reached Berlin and lopped off Germany's leadership at the head, it was over.

As I described in my previous post, Japan was not the case.
 
The invasion of Japan would have been alot different than that of the invasion of Germany. Many more civilians would have died in the onslaught, many were willing to fight to the death of their homeland. In a way the bomb saved many lives and helped Japan more than hurt. Though the A bomb was a terrible weapon' it ended the biggest war in human history.
 
Dropping the bomb was used partially to defeat the Japanese, the other for stemming Soviet aggression. An invasion of the Japanese homeland would have cost the lives of thousands of Allied soldiers, regardless of any precautions taken. Also, the Soviets were pushing south through Manchuria very quickly and had also drawn up plans to invade the Japanese home islands. By dropping the bombs, the U.S. wanted to make the Soviets stop and think about doing any more expanding in Asia and in Europe. For the most part this worked, the Soviets withdrew out of Manchuria, and cancelled plans for an invasion of the Japanese home islands. However this didn't really make them loosen their grip on Eastern Europe. Also, upon seeing the power of the bomb and the position of power it put the United States in, the Soviets put a lot more resources and effort into the construction of their our atomic arsenal.
 
A look at the facts:

1. More people were killed in the bombings of cities such as Dresden and Tokyo, than by either of the two atomic bombs.

2. Japan commited atrocities against the Chinese that make the acts of Hitler, Stalin, and make the Atomic Bombings look like a slap of the hand. The Japanese soldiers and people as a whole were a massively destruction and aggressive force capable of acts beyond your worst nightmares. Read about the rape of Nanking, sometime. The United States was fully justified in using all means neccessary to end the war as quickly as possible.

3. Very few individuals knew just how destructive the bomb was. Even fewer had any idea that such residual effects would exist.

4. Japan was working testing chemical weapons and other devices on Prisoners of War and foreign nationals. They had also been working, up until the end of the war, to send bombs laden with chemical weapons to be dropped on the west coast via use of baloons and sophisticated timing devices.



The fact is that we can play this game all day, but the fact is that if these several hundred thousand civilians had been killed by conventional strategic bombing, if the marred survivors had been torn up by conventional strategic bombing, then we would not be speaking of any of this today. Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not be known to so many. And we probably would not have Godzilla.
 
To adress your (John HSOG) points on an issue I have already debated ( http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=110767 ):

1.
More people were killed in the bombings of cities such as Dresden and Tokyo, than by either of the two atomic bombs.

roughly translated early in the morning

Dresden 13/2 1945 Dresden became the brittish air force's greatest victory (in bombing) during the entire war. The firestorm of Hamburg ... reemerged in an even more terrifying shape. The temperature rose to more than 1 000 degrees [celcius]. Around 100 000 civilians killed - the exact number was impossible to determine because that many bodies could never have been identified or even sepparated from one another before they had transformed "into the half-liquid state that must be passed before earth may become earth once more". The statement is of Kurt Vonnegut. He was a POW at Dresden, survived the air raid and took part in digging up the bodies.

Tokyo 9-10/3 1945 In Tokyo the winter of 1944-45 was the clearest and coldest in decades. For 45 days in a row the temperature had been below zero [celcius] and it was still snowing at the end of Febuary. But the 9th of March spring finally came. There was a strong wind the entire day and in the eavening the weather was almost stormy. At around 11 the bomb alert sounded. For the first time, the plane came at a low altitude. The Order was for every family to stay and defend its own home. But how? The bomb shelters where merely holes in the ground covered by wooden boards and a thin layer of dirt. The bombs fell by the thousands, once house could be hit by 10 or more at the same time. These were a new kid of bombs, they spread a flaming liquid that poured along the roofs and light up everything it touched. The violent winds caught the burning drops and soon it was raing fire that stuck to everthing.

The neighbors formed a chai, as planned, to passed buckets of water. efter a few seconds they were surrounded by flames. The fragile wooden houses light up immidieatly, the families left their houses screaming, carrying their babies on their backs. The were met by a wall of flames. They light up in the fire storm, became living torches and disappeared. People threw themselvs into the canals and emerged until only their mouth was above water. Hundreds suffocated due to smoke and lack of oxygen. Other canals were heated up by the fires. The people in those were boiled alive.

One fourth of the capital burned tot he ground, one million people homeless, 100 000 abhorrantly killed.

Hiroshima 6/8 1945, 8:16 AM This is what happened in the first second of the bomb's explosion.

0.0 The bomb detonated around 600 meters above the shima hospital in central Hiroshima, in the height of the morning traffic. The temperature at the time of detonation rose (in a millionth of a second) to many million degrees [celcius].

0.1 A fireball measuring 15 meters in diameterwas formed with a temperature at around 300 000 degrees [celcius]. At the same time neutrons and gamma rays reeached the ground and cause the direct radiation damage on living organisms.

0.15 The fireball expanded och faster still expanded the shock wave. The air got hotter and became illuminated.

0.2-0.3 Huge amounts of infrared energy are formed and caused the greater part of the burn damage on people.

1.0 The fireball reached maximal size, 200-300 meters diameter. The shockwave that carried the fire expanded at the speed of sound.

Around 100 000 citizens, of which 95 000 civilians, where killed immidiatly. Some 100 000 people, mostly civilian, continued long after to die a drawn out death to radiation.


Conclusion: More people died from the Atomic bombings than from the larger conventional/ napalm bombings.

2.
Japan commited atrocities against the Chinese that pale in comparison to the acts of Hitler, Stalin, and make the Atomic Bombings look like a slap of the hand. The Japanese soldiers and people as a whole were a massively destruction and aggressive force capable of acts beyond your worst nightmares. Read about the rape of Nanking, sometime. The United States was fully justified in using all means neccessary to end the war as quickly as possible.

right, the japs were bad and needed to be punished. The janks can walk away guiltfree. The same day that the reports from Hiroshima reach the American homes (6th of september, 1945, thanks to the australian journalist Wilfred Burchett) the military published a report (saved for the occassion) describing around 200 japanese abuses of american POWs, incluing acts of canibalism and living burials. Also the government employed journalist William Laurance wrote a piece on how great it had been to bomb Nagasaki. Also the general Farrell flew 11 scientists (lacking backbone) to Hiroshima and had them state that the bomb had left no traces of radioactive fallout. Furthmore General Groves convinced the US congress that the radiation did not cause any meaningless suffering but was rather "a very pleasurable way to die."

How could he have been proven wrong? Fotographs of victims were banned, a three hour long documntary was confiscated and released 20 years later.

Justified my *ss.


3.
Very few individuals knew just how destructive the bomb was. Even fewer had any idea that such residual effects would exist.

oh yeah? then why did 70 of the scientists who made the bomb (including Leo Szilard, the main guy involved in teh project) sign a letter beggin Truman not to use the bomb?
And afterwards the destructive effects were hidden to the media and the american citizens (as usual).

4.
Japan was working testing chemical weapons and other devices on Prisoners of War and foreign nationals. They had also been working, up until the end of the war, to send bombs laden with chemical weapons to be dropped on the west coast via use of baloons and sophisticated timing devices

they were also sending constant preace proposals, all which the US government ignored.

The fact is that we can play this game all day, but the fact is that if these several hundred thousand civilians had been killed by conventional strategic bombing, if the marred survivors had been torn up by conventional strategic bombing, then we would not be speaking of any of this today. Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not be known to so many. And we probably would not have Godzilla.

We still speak with loathing of conventional bombing. We still speak of Chechaouen and Guernica. We still speak of Dresden and Tokyo. We still speak of the bombing of Vietnam and the bombing of Iraq. Nukes are worse, but that doesn't mean that the anti-nuke lobby enjoys the conventional "send 10 planes to bomb that village" bombing that has been used from the Italian assualt outside Tripoli to the Gulf War.

Bombing is not good, is not clean and it doesn't save lives, it takes lives.
 
Conclusion: More people died from the Atomic bombings than from the larger conventional/ napalm bombings.
I think what John was saying was that conventional bombs have killed more people than nuclear weapons have.

He also makes a good point in that if Hiroshima was destroyed by 250 B-17 bombers instead of the Enola Gay, the same number of people would have died, just as painfully, and the only difference would be that the bombing of Hiroshima wouldn't even be an issue today.
 
Japanrocks12 said:
You are kidding aren't you?

No. If a teenager/child attacks me with a weapon and I'm a soldier I'll shoot him dead. Blame the government/culture for putting him in that situation.
 
XXXX60 years ago today, August 6th, 1945. After 4 years of total war with the United states, the United kingdom, and a politcaly devited China, the war weary Empire of Japan continued to strugle stubrinly for its millitary survivel. With the posibility of 100,000 more american dead and up to a 1,000,000 more japaneis dead, the presadint of the united States of American made the decison to drop the first atomic bomb on the industral city of Hiroshima. 3 days latter the United Soviet Socalist Republics decleared war. Japan, now with the posibility of 2 invasions, an american one from the south, and a soviet invasion from the north, was faced with a grim fate yet still did not give into surender. On august 9th, a second atomic bomb was drop on the city of Nagasaki. Eatch bomb killed outright aproximatly 120,000 indivudal people and twice as many people over time. Now with no chance of victory, a new Chines offensive, and its eniter millitary in korea and manchiria crused by a rapid soviet blitzkreg, Japan was forced to surender. On August 15th, Japan formuly surendered the the united state of america. some say america was wrong by droping the atomic bombs. alltogether about 400 thousand people whear killed. over all, 2 million japanes soldiers and civilans died. and aproximatly 100 thosand american soldiers and saliors. *over all just over 400 thosand americans whear killed by the combied killings of japan, and germany* To those i say this. Japan was preapeared to defend its self from invasion, 10 thosand aircraft prepared for kamikazi atacks, 3 million soldiers ready to fight to the death, and millions of citizans mobalized to defend the home islands and the god emperior. aproxamitly 100,000 american troops whold have died in the final invasion, and aproxmitly 1 million more japanes. the war whold have draged on for posibly another year or 2. japan may have been devied after the war if the soviets had invaded. created a communist north and capitalist south japan. 400 thosand dead to keep japan one nation, to save 1 million of ther own people, 100 thousand americans and an untoled number of soviet troops. allso, lets not forget the 4 MILLION the japanes had killed in china, the slave camps, rape rooms, and random exacutions of p.o.w.s. Was it worth it?... thats up too you.. Since 1939 the world had been at war. After 6 years of war, and Over 60 million dead peace finaly falls apont the world. a tanted peace of constint strugle between the Communist east and the Capitalist weast only to be sucseeded by the horrors of terrorism. In memory of the 60 million that died and even more who fought in the war that changed the world forever. i beg every one who reads this, not to forget the sacrafices of "the greateast genneration"


i whrote this earlyer.. it may not be 100% acurate but i made it as acurate as i can.
forgive me for the bad spelling
im not happy over the use of the atomic bombs. but i think it saved lives on both sides. i whold have done the same thing..

The sad fact of it is, the use of the atomic bombs on citys hiroshima and nagasaki whear the necisicary evil.
 
Bozo Erectus said:
(from article)My honest feeling at the time was that they deserved it, and as far as I am concerned that is still how I feel today.

People never look back to what led up to it - Pearl Harbour, Nanking - and there are no innocent civilians in war, everyone is doing something, contributing to the war effort, building bombs.


(from Bozo)Strangely enough, I dont blame these men for the actual act of dropping the bomb. They were military men with orders. Pilots in war or peace time dont get the option to veto missions they dont agree with. What really troubles me is that all these years later, they still feel no remorse. How is that possible? How can ordinary men commit such horrific acts, and feel nothing? If the world is filled with ordinary men like these, is their any hope for humanity?
There are no civilians in war? That guy is absolutely crazy. A simple question for that guy - if the Japanese had developed a nuclear weapon first and dropped it on a US city, would he be happy, and agree that it was a valid target? If thousands of American children died would they count as non-civilians?

3/4 of the US's nuclear arsenal was made under his tutelage, and he's proud to have that as his `legacy'?
 
Actually, he's absolutely right. In World War II, there were no civilians. Entire nations turned their entire economies towards winning the war. So much so that Americans ran out of copper for pennies! We used tin pennies for the last three years of the war.

In any case, nobody in America was a legitimate target. Japan had no more right to shoot at our soldiers than at Los Angeles.
 
BasketCase said:
That's the thing--Japan was NOT about to surrender. Before the nukes, the Japanese leadership was planning to fight to the death.

They didn't have an idea the US had nukes.

Therefore the best way how to avoid the massacre would be to show them the destructive power of the new device, prefereably on some purely military target.

The fact is the US leadership was afraid, because they had just two nukes, so they didn't want to "waste" one of them for demonstration. So they decided to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians by a very, very brutal and sadistic method.

The usage of A-bombs against Japan wasn't much different from the firebombings of Japan cities, which was (unlike the bombing of the most of German cities) intended to kill civilians (to scare the Japanese population, nowadays, we call this terrorism).

(have you seen the Pearl Harbor movie? I have and I must say it is the worst movie I have EVER seen. In fact, it looks like the script was written in Pentagon. I especially laughed at the end, when the US pilots said something about choosing the "nearest military target" :lol:
On one of our TV channels, they air an original movies from WW2. The racist and propaganda crap is everywhere. I have the impression the Americans in fact considered Japanese as a inferior race, which should justify the mass killings of their civilians.
www.archive.org is full of similar clips, for example this:
http://www.archive.org/details/OurEnemy1943 )
 
If the Japanese didn't surrender after the Tokyo firebombings I doubt detonating a nuke on an unhiabited island would convince them either.
 
Winner said:
The fact is the US leadership was afraid, because they had just two nukes, so they didn't want to "waste" one of them for demonstration. So they decided to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians by a very, very brutal and sadistic method.
So what?? The entire war was fought that way.
 
Timko said:
There are no civilians in war? That guy is absolutely crazy. A simple question for that guy - if the Japanese had developed a nuclear weapon first and dropped it on a US city, would he be happy, and agree that it was a valid target? If thousands of American children died would they count as non-civilians?

Well, that really is the problem with "total" war. How many Japanese took to the streets protesting their country's invasions of China and other Asian nations? How many Germans protested Hitler's invasion of Poland? If they weren't out there trying to depose their leaders then they were in effect supporting the killing of their neighbors. Just as soldiers risk their lives when their country goes to war, civillians risk theirs when they fall to stop the leaders who send them.
 
BasketCase said:
So what?? The entire war was fought that way.


Well, your reaction is EXACTLY what I am talking about.

You admit you did things which are exactly as terrible as your enemy? OK. So don't be so touchy when I say it were a war crimes and large-scale terrorism and the US pilots as well as those who gave the order are butchers, which can be compared with people like Himmler
 
Back
Top Bottom