Aphex_Twin
Evergreen
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2002
- Messages
- 7,474
I can't believe I'm farther right than luiz 

Yea, i only answered 'strongly' on some. Most of the economic ones were just agree or disagree, so a fairly central score for me. I would think on a scale of 1 to 10 (so there is no middle number) would be a better way to do it.cierdan said:Maybe I was so close to the centre because I only answered "Strongly..." on one or two questions.
Of course this test is for fun and not a scientific testbad_ronald said:This test is poorly designed, and no results should be taken seriously
I don't agree. Yes there are tons of useless arguments, but without a multi-party system you can't represent the different preferences of heterogenous societies; therefore IMO, answering yes is clearly autoritarian.bad_ronald said:1. "A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system." - This is true; I can't imagine how anyone could deny that it avoids many "arguments that delay progress" by its very nature, but I'd imagine that the author of the site awards authoritarian points for anyone who agrees.
Bozo Erectus said:Talesian, thats cool. You should make a version using peoples avatars, instead of the dots.
Indeed, im thinking billboard sized, so else you'd have loads of peoples overlapping as well, or so small that you can make out what avatar it is.Taliesin said:That would require a very very large graph.