Your assumption is that I value your opinion of me, or indeed, those of the people who would side with you.
My assumption is that you wont value the opinion but you will respond to it anyways giving me somethie amused with! Thanks!
It's no secret that I genuinely despise you, who you claim to be, and what you stand for, just as it's no secret that I'm no big supporter of Luckymoose either. I don't know what your point is.
My point is that their is despising someone and then there is attacking someone for no reason. What you have done is the latter
Your arguments need little attack to prove them insubstantial--I believe in economy of effort. Perhaps you have not noticed that with your history of being a pathological liar, nobody on this forum takes you seriously, and indeed several people do not come forward and challenge the things you say, but dislike you nonetheless? At any rate, your fan club is not any larger than mine.
Anyone who has strong convictions is bound to be disliked by some. I dont deny that, and I dont understant how you do not realise that. The point is that I am still
friendly and civil towards people unless otherwise they attack me. I dont care if you love me, just that you treat me with respect.
With the arguments, yes fair enough you may think their are insubstanital.. However as a father of 3 and a wife, I lack the time to do the research into posts to descredit you and proove to you my points, or go to the lengths you choose to go to.
As for being a liar yes I lied about the masters thing, I admitted that but I really did it to just shut you up haha. Whether this makes me a pathological liar I dont care.
On the contrary, human society is built on primate dominance mechanics. We just like to wrap it up in a nice little nuanced gestures most of the time. I just have no compunction with exercising aggression to discredit misleading or harmful sources of information that are not taken seriously or held in high esteem to begin with. "Beating the dead horse," as it were. You happen to be one.
I feel very sorry for you if you feel that is the best way to get ahead and be loved by those who matter to you, (and note for further down the track I do stress those who matter for you). As for misleading or harmful sources, I do believe you would rather not admit that you could be wrong from time to time and refer to the above statement re. my family as to the reason why I do not go to such lengths to proove my point and once again stress that the primary function of my being on the NES forums is for fun, NOT what you seem to think it is: A simulation of a living world, with everything including the general-fun being surbodinated to it.
Nice cover for a lack of ability. I expect no less from someone whose chief avenue of attack is pop-culture psychoanalyzing pedantry.
Dismiss what is evidence from simple observations, if you will. I dont mind I dont claim to be a psychiatrist. Those are my opinions of you, nothing else but and I dont claim otherwise anywhere. As for lack of ability, sure if you believe it, I dont care, do so... it makes it all the more funny when you go to such great lengths to disprove what I know is right just through prior study and experience.
Once again I refer you to the family reason as to the reason behind this and not your hackneyed unrealised ideals.
Hey, I can play this game too! How's that Messiah Complex of yours where you can do no wrong and everybody is your buddy? How do you reconcile it with the fact a lot of people here don't talk with you very much or very often? How does the fact you once had to have somebody write orders for you to win a war, and have had around fifty dead games to your credit square with your opinion of your abilities? Your doublethink must be quite impressive. Care to share your secrets with the rest of us?
Do you seriously think that the only people I speak to on the internet are the Nesing variety? If thats the case for you I am really sorry to hear that. Once again I also point ahead where I take note that I know not everyone loves me... however I do remain
civil and friendly towards them because it is the thing a gentleman does to those he associates with.
Do also take note that I do not attack you until you have attacked me. There is simply no point to, you have valid points sometimes, and I do agree with you on some issues like American politics as of late, however when you attack me personally, I no longer feel as though I should be civil and friendly towards you even though I dislike you, and thus this occurs. If you wish to prevent it from occurring look at what you say to me and ensure its not to be considered a personal attack. If it don't say it! Then I wont have to tell you where everyone can read what exactly I think of you, and then they can watch your vain attempts to dismiss it as pop-psychoanalyzing, when its simply my judgement of your character.
I don't take advice from people who have to lie to substantiate their existence, sorry.
Well in 25 years if we are still at this (which I devoutly hope not) then I will be the first to say 'I told you so'. Other than that I don't care what you do.