Actually, I believe that the artwork etc required for a new leader is quite significant.
I agree...though proficient Civ IV graphics modders might not . 18 civs in the mix is enough to start with, but it leads to people coming onto Civfanatics looking for more...Civ 5 graphics need to be more easily modded than Civ IV.
was civ4 vanilla very good? and did people still buy expansion packs?
back on topic:
18 civs is fine.
i even can't imagine firaxis coming up with 18 unique civ(leader?) traits for each civ
Comments like yours are downright comical, and it's flabergasting you can spout this crap and actually be serious.Poeple who live in the Us Are happy thay have Usa and are ok with 18 Civs, people like me (Australian) would like Australia to be add and then we would be fine with 18 Civs, that just my guess
No they don't. They only have a limited amount of time to work on everything, and in order to make deadlines they plan for a reasonable amount of civs, units, techs, etc, that they are pretty sure they can finish in the allotted time. There is no great conspiracy to roll thing over into the expansion pack. Maybe EA does that crap, but Firaxis certainly does not, at least it does not have a history of it, and there is no reason to assume they have suddenly started behaving that way today.They keep it low so you have to buy the expansion later.
No worries, I'm sure adding new civs won't be too difficult.
Comments like yours are downright comical, and it's flabergasting you can spout this crap and actually be serious.
I'm certainly no uber nationalist, in fact I think the USA has done some pretty despicable things in it's history, though it's no worse then the history of other nations that have achieved similar levels of power. However to try to compare the US and Australia in terms of greatness is foolish. There are some nations, like for instance Egypt, with it's historical impact on mathematics, and it's ties to some of the great wonders like the Pyramids; or others like China, with it's deep history, size, and the fact it built the Great Wall; or the Greeks and the impact of Alexander, their influence on philosophy; or the Spanish and their impact on the New World and the huge expanse of their empire: The nations attest to epic points in history, and are recognized the world over. The United States likewise is the birthplace of the Automobile, motorized flight, it's role in the last two great world wars was of great historical importance, it's constitution has directly influenced the governing structure of dozens of nations, and today it is an unrivaled superpower in terms of cultural influence, military power, and economic force; it is the worlds first hyperpower. It's reasonable for one to assert that, assuming humans have not destroyed themselves by that date, in 1000 years people will still study and know the USA as ubiquitously as they know of India and Rome.
For a person to claim, and open the conversation by claiming the US is less deserving of a spot in a game of Civilization then Australia is nothing less then completely asinine. I really wonder what's going on in people's heads sometimes, are they truly that indifferent to the concept of reality?
I support a mod that makes 192 civs available. At the same time on the same map.
thats crazy, my dude, 192 civs same time...same map!?!? how large does the map have to be? how much ram do you need!? its crazy my brother lol..not crazy insane!
Comments like yours are downright comical, and it's flabergasting you can spout this crap and actually be serious.
I'm certainly no uber nationalist, in fact I think the USA has done some pretty despicable things in it's history, though it's no worse then the history of other nations that have achieved similar levels of power. However to try to compare the US and Australia in terms of greatness is foolish. There are some nations, like for instance Egypt, with it's historical impact on mathematics, and it's ties to some of the great wonders like the Pyramids; or others like China, with it's deep history, size, and the fact it built the Great Wall; or the Greeks and the impact of Alexander, their influence on philosophy; or the Spanish and their impact on the New World and the huge expanse of their empire: The nations attest to epic points in history, and are recognized the world over. The United States likewise is the birthplace of the Automobile, motorized flight, it's role in the last two great world wars was of great historical importance, it's constitution has directly influenced the governing structure of dozens of nations, and today it is an unrivaled superpower in terms of cultural influence, military power, and economic force; it is the worlds first hyperpower. It's reasonable for one to assert that, assuming humans have not destroyed themselves by that date, in 1000 years people will still study and know the USA as ubiquitously as they know of India and Rome.
For a person to claim, and open the conversation by claiming the US is less deserving of a spot in a game of Civilization then Australia is nothing less then completely asinine. I really wonder what's going on in people's heads sometimes, are they truly that indifferent to the concept of reality?
Poeple who live in the Us Are happy thay have Usa and are ok with 18 Civs, people like me (Australian) would like Australia to be add and then we would be fine with 18 Civs, that just my guess
this link will help some American With their knowing the world (and when i mean world i don't mean America)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
Aren't there going to be like minor nations?