Yaype
Me
Sobieski II said:You don't treat those nations as friends, but rather aquaintances of convenience.
As a Canadian, if Americans treat me as an aquaintance of convenience, then I know longer consider them friends, but rather just aquaintances of convenience.
And a thing about that, is what happens when it is no longer convenient. You don't seem to understand how much damage your government has done to your friendship of other peoples. I don't suggest you are a Bush supporter, but was just pointing out that you cannot automatically assume the relationship hasn't changed after the administration in charge (as well as the entire American media beaming all over the world), basically says that the opinions of 80% of Canadians 88% of Spaniards.... and so on, do not count, and that America would act in spite of us.
Of course America falls more in my favour than most countries around the world, but for me (as well as most people not in the states), that opinion has dropped rather considerably.
I would contend that acting in spite of the wishes of those who you claim as friends does not necessarily make those friends cease to be such. The U.S. has not (at least not publicly and with the knowledge of its citizens) acted in a way that was explicitly intended to be detrimental to any of our allies, nor has it said anything about wanting long-lasting friendships to end. Acting in a way that is intended to bring greater freedom to the world (misguided or not) despite having disagreements with friends cannot be justified as an attempt to end any friendships. Disagreements happen--it is the way they are dealt with in the long run that determine whether friendships last. The U.S. has not abandoned its friends, and its citizens do not intend to do so.