EnglishEdward
Deity
I'd question the necessity of having him brutally ejected!
Yes, brutally is a poor choice of words.
I should have said forcibly.
I'd question the necessity of having him brutally ejected!
Which makes the denominator "offensive" completely out of place when you describe the nature of a joke, since offensiveness isn't an inherent trait of a joke. It is added after the event when someone gets offended.I, in turn, find the use of the word "inappropriate" in this context interesting because one could just as easily apply that word to the joke itself. Also, I am not sure there is such a thing as an "objectively" offensive joke. Jokes have to be offensive to someone - a joke is, empirically speaking, offensive if someone takes offense to it.
You were right the first time around. Chris Rock made a joke about Jada's bald head, he wasn't joking about other people's illness.So you are basically saying for anyone who finds Rock's face is slappable for making an offensive remark about Will's wife's balded hair which is a result of an auto-immune disease
[...]
how about those peoples who can't understand that people might slap their face when they making joke over other people's illness
It was a joke, not an insensitive insult.Throwing offensive, insensitive insults
It's odd that the don't be a jerk is aimed at someone making a joke, not the one slapping.The best solution is, don't be a jerk, people should keep their mouths far away from things that matter to others if they don't want to get slap.
Probably also the reason he didn't do the one thing he could have done in order to preserve the moral high ground. Namely, walk out of the venue.
You were right the first time around. Chris Rock made a joke about Jada's bald head, he wasn't joking about other people's illness.
It was a joke, not an insensitive insult.
Maybe the one not being able to take the joke should not attend an event where it is practically tradition to crack jokes about the millionaires in the room. Oh wait, but he got nominated for an Oscar. Right.
Probably also the reason he didn't do the one thing he could have done in order to preserve the moral high ground. Namely, walk out of the venue.
Inappropriate, likewise. Since the Oscars is the designated event where the hosts are expected to crack those inappropriate jokes, does that make the joke appropriate for the event?
Still doesn't make the joke about the illness.Bruh, what are you saying here Ziggy, like, it's different if I mock Joe Rogan bald head and called look like my thumb. compare that with I mock cancer patient's bald head. I can't just say "well, those two are the same, I aimed after their bald head" because no, it isn't the same.
Gee whiz, thanks for that explanation. Back to my statement: It was a joke, not an insensitive insult. Because it was a joke, not an insult. I do realise very well jokes can be used as an insult. This one wasn't.Lots of insults are jokes. Like, I can coat an insult into joking something that's mean a lot to you and make fun of it, lets say like a tragedy that's just happened to your life, you lost your job and you lost someone that you love, and I make a clown out of it, the fact that I present it as a joke doesn't mean I can duck it from it being insensitive insults.
I can imagine, since them being millionaires wasn't the point when I said: "should not attend an event where it is practically tradition to crack jokes about the millionaires in the room"I don't know what millionaires have anything to do with this discussion as if the fact that they are millionaires and public figures they got every right and obligation to remain silent from insults and mockery. I don't get this.
The slap is surprising since it answers speech with violence. Also: it's not an insult, it's a joke.That is the best option, I agree with you, but the slap is also not surprising, despite it's not the best and the smartest reaction, but his insult agitates that reaction.
Not aware of the history and context of the word "inappropriate" in your discussion, and not that interested, so sure.I don't know. Traitorfish was the one who used the word "inappropriate," not me. I would have used a word like "unjustified".
Is the name: "host at the Oscars"? (assuming the people you're referring to are the guests at the Oscars who have been roasted at the Oscars for years)Anyway, there is a common name for a person who doesn't care about the emotional impact of their words on other people.
I didn't say you did. Bit quick to take offense here, eh?I don't give a crap about Chris Rock, thou project too much.
It doesn't matter if it was hypothetical, what matters is the people posting who support the hypothetical. Thus rendering their dislike of Smith's slap pretty hollow, right?Apparently you still don't get what was easy to get 2000 years ago - I even quoted Aristotle - and then also feel proud of that. The Rock smacking Will Smith who'd have slapped him is a hypothetical; Smith slapping Rock is a reality.
I have no idea. Very few, if any, people in this thread think that violence was appropriate in this context. Understandable, maybe. Appropriate, pretty obviously not. I can't speak for every single poster, but that's the general impression.So you think using violence wasn't appropriate, thus agree with us. What is the issue then?
24 pages of arguing says "yeah folks probably do".That is just a platitude; do you think anyone needs you so as to realize that speech can have impact?
Again, a bit quick to take offense here, yeah? I was talking to Traitorfish, about something he posted. I wasn't directing it at you.No it's not; you are projecting your own crusade here. I have no issue with the joke being identified as bad or being bad. The thread isn't about apllauding Rock's joke, but cauterizing the ridiculous response by Smith.
These things aren't exclusionary, you know?Also: it's not an insult, it's a joke.
These things aren't exclusionary, you know?
I do realise very well jokes can be used as an insult. This one wasn't.
I think this opinion is the thing people are split over, more than anything else (slap being right or wrong, Oscars being for completely out of touch rich people, etc, et al).
Did Chris Rock mean to insult Jada?I think this opinion is the thing people are split over, more than anything else
Did Chris Rock mean to insult Jada?
If he was, would that make the joke an insult?
If he wasn't, would that make the joke a joke with the potential to insult? (an insulting joke). (Where the people are split argument would pop up)
Is the difference between the noun "insult" and the verb "(to) insult" relevant?
Am I using this thread mainly to distract me from posting in the Ukraine thread?
One of these questions I have a definite answer to.
I don't get the point. It was unscripted, regardless of what it was a part of. Rock chose to do it, and chose to deliver it in the way that he did. He could've easily picked any other person there with their partner. Are you saying he's not a good enough comedian to manage that?It was part of a routine, two jokes which were linked by being about actor/actress couples there in the ceremony - first Bardem and his wife, then the Smiths. It'd be hard to target someone else once the routine was set by Rock.