Wiped off the map comment, misquoted?

boarder

King
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
898
Location
Canterbury,New Zealand
Did Iran's president really call for Israel to be wiped from the map?

Most media and leaders around the world use this statement every day to portray Iran as in the league of Nazi germany, a evil state that just wants to destroy Israel.
But what if he was simply misquoted as it sounds better than what he actually said. And can be used as a justification for doing whatever nations feel like doing to Iran.
I have been doing some research and have found out the following information regarding this speech.
This is his speech as reported by the New York times and seems to be the one that all media sources and goverment leaders quote from
"They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan. Let's take a step back. [[[We had a hostile regime in this country which was undemocratic, armed to the teeth and, with SAVAK, its security apparatus of SAVAK [the intelligence bureau of the Shah of Iran's government] watched everyone. An environment of terror existed.]]] When our dear Imam [Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Iranian revolution] said that the regime must be removed, many of those who claimed to be politically well-informed said it was not possible. All the corrupt governments were in support of the regime when Imam Khomeini started his movement. [[[All the Western and Eastern countries supported the regime even after the massacre of September 7 [1978] ]]] and said the removal of the regime was not possible. But our people resisted and it is 27 years now that we have survived without a regime dependent on the United States. The tyranny of the East and the West over the world should have to end, but weak people who can see only what lies in front of them cannot believe this. Who would believe that one day we could witness the collapse of the Eastern Empire? But we could watch its fall in our lifetime. And it collapsed in a way that we have to refer to libraries because no trace of it is left. Imam [Khomeini] said Saddam must go and he said he would grow weaker than anyone could imagine. Now you see the man who spoke with such arrogance ten years ago that one would have thought he was immortal, is being tried in his own country in handcuffs and shackles [[[by those who he believed supported him and with whose backing he committed his crimes]]]. Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime [Israel] has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world."

And this is the text that was translated by MEMRI which is a middle eastern translation company that translates articles for the western media. And where the NYT gets its ME news from.
"They [ask]: 'Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?' But you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved. [[[...]]] "'When the dear Imam [Khomeini] said that [the Shah's] regime must go, and that we demand a world without dependent governments, many people who claimed to have political and other knowledge [asked], 'Is it possible [that the Shah's regime can be toppled]?' That day, when Imam [Khomeini] began his movement, all the powers supported [the Shah's] corrupt regime [[[...]]] and said it was not possible. However, our nation stood firm, and by now we have, for 27 years, been living without a government dependent on America. Imam [Khomeni] said: 'The rule of the East [U.S.S.R.] and of the West [U.S.] should be ended.' But the weak people who saw only the tiny world near them did not believe it. Nobody believed that we would one day witness the collapse of the Eastern Imperialism [i.e. the U.S.S.R], and said it was an iron regime. But in our short lifetime we have witnessed how this regime collapsed in such a way that we must look for it in libraries, and we can find no literature about it. Imam [Khomeini] said that Saddam [Hussein] must go, and that he would be humiliated in a way that was unprecedented. And what do you see today? A man who, 10 years ago, spoke as proudly as if he would live for eternity is today chained by the feet, and is now being tried in his own country [[[...]]] Imam [Khomeini] said: 'This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history.' This sentence is very wise. The issue of Palestine is not an issue on which we can compromise. Is it possible that an [Islamic] front allows another front [i.e. country] to arise in its [own] heart? This means defeat, and he who accepts the existence of this regime [i.e. Israel] in fact signs the defeat of the Islamic world. In his battle against the World of Arrogance, our dear Imam [Khomeini] set the regime occupying Qods [Jerusalem] as the target of his fight. I do not doubt that the new wave which has begun in our dear Palestine and which today we are also witnessing in the Islamic world is a wave of morality which has spread all over the Islamic world. Very soon, this stain of disgrace [i.e. Israel] will vanish from the center of the Islamic world - and this is attainable."

I highlighted the relevant part.

The term 'map' to which the media refer at length does not even appear. Whereas the 'New York Times' said: "Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map" the version by MEMRI is: "Imam [Khomeini] said: This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history."
A huge difference in respect of headlines which are for example "Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map". And is often used when discussing the threat Iran is to Israel, which if it wasnt said is a fallacy to the argument of the threat Iran poses to Israel.

At a later news conference on January 14, 2006, Ahmadinejad claimed his speech had been exaggerated and misinterpreted.
On 20 February 2006, Iran’s foreign minister denied that Tehran wanted to see Israel “wiped off the map,” saying Ahmadinejad had been misunderstood. "Nobody can remove a country from the map. This is a misunderstanding in Europe of what our president mentioned," Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference, speaking in English, after addressing the European Parliament. "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognise legally this regime," he said.

I also noted with interest someone mentioning a article from Dr Juan Cole in another post, anyway, Dr Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, translates the Farsi phrase as:
The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)

Now Memri (Middle East Media Reshearch Institute)translates the same quote as [T]his regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history

So to summarise both Memri and Dr Juan Cole have not mentioned Israel being wiped off the face off the map, and all western media gets there media translations from Memri, so this is obviuosly been mis quoted.

Please note,this in now way means I think Israel's regime should go,I am just trying to get to the truth of what was said.


Links and sources.
http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-603386
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/1727961_comment.php#1727969
http://www.answers.com/topic/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-and-israel
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12949.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmou...Translation_of_phrase_.22Wiped_Off_the_Map.22
www.memri.org
 
1. What makes you certain, or even suspect, that the first speech is the one always referenced?
2. Isn't that second quote in the second speech just as bad as the "wiped off the map" comment?
3. If you want to hear how crazy Ahmadinejad is, just read the letter he wrote to the President, in which he politely assumes, for argument's sake, that the Holocaust happened.
 
I am sorry but I am still going to be suspicious on Iran with that crazy nutjob at the helm.
 
The speech you quoted is the speech of a demented imbecile.
 
Had it also occured to you that right after the bolded parts he says "this is a very wise statement?"
 
cgannon64 said:
1. What makes you certain, or even suspect, that the first speech is the one always referenced?
2. Isn't that second quote in the second speech just as bad as the "wiped off the map" comment?
3. If you want to hear how crazy Ahmadinejad is, just read the letter he wrote to the President, in which he politely assumes, for argument's sake, that the Holocaust happened.

1.Due to the "wiped off the map" always being quoted in media such as CNN,BBC etc pretty much all media. As well as still quoting "wiped off the map" by world leaders etc.
2.Yes it isnt good I agree, yet if its just a call for regime change then isnt that what America,Israel are calling for in Iran. Its all in the wording as i see it, whereas "wiped off the map" brings about a lot more thoughts of destruction then calling for "regime change".
3.I don't think hes sane or any good for Iran, I can see why people think that I may but its not the case, he is one of the main problems as I see it.

luiz said:
The speech you quoted is the speech of a demented imbecile.
I agree, but I was more trying to point if he was misquoted regarding the calling of Israel to be wiped of the map.

In fact by the sounds of things Iran's mullahs are to sick of his messianic mutterings.
http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level_English.php?cat=Religion&loid=8.0.301172653&par=
quote "Many Iranian Ayatollahs condemned the president for the messianic tone of his letter, reminding him that he is not a theologian but was elected president with a four-year mandate.

"Mahmoud Ahmadinejad should worry about the current problems of the country instead of acting like the saviour of the world," said Grand Ayatollah Hassan Ali Montazeri"
 
boarder said:
1.Due to the "wiped off the map" always being quoted in media such as CNN,BBC etc pretty much all media. As well as still quoting "wiped off the map" by world leaders etc.
2.Yes it isnt good I agree, yet if its just a call for regime change then isnt that what America,Israel are calling for in Iran. Its all in the wording as i see it, whereas "wiped off the map" brings about a lot more thoughts of destruction then calling for "regime change".
3.I don't think hes sane or any good for Iran, I can see why people think that I may but its not the case, he is one of the main problems as I see it.
1. I know that, but you just chose one random speech and said, "Well, it isn't here!"
2. He didn't say regime change, he said "eliminated from the pages of history"; a statement that is, I think, exactly analogous to "wipe off the map."
3. Fair enough.
 
rmsharpe said:
Had it also occured to you that right after the bolded parts he says "this is a very wise statement?"

Yes i had noticed that in the Mermi translation it was "This sentence is very wise"
and in the NYT it is as you say "this is a very wise statement?".
But I dont think thats the point you are making, if it is that they are inflamatory and spoken by a idiot, I would agree.
 
cgannon64 said:
1. I know that, but you just chose one random speech and said, "Well, it isn't here!"
2. He didn't say regime change, he said "eliminated from the pages of history"; a statement that is, I think, exactly analogous to "wipe off the map."
3. Fair enough.

Yes i choose that one random speech, due to it being the phrase always quoted, when if its wrong then it shouldnt be. Also a group of Israeli's are applying to a court to get "incitement of genocide" based on the "wiped of the map" speech, and im wondering if the exacting wording will come out then and start to be reported correctly.

You are right he didnt, its what I have interpretted it to call for, and that is due to that certain part of his speech being inteppretted differently yet agaian this time by Dr Cole which he got ,
The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)
And regime is clearly mentioned. Wheras Israel being wiped off the map isnt mentioned at all.
While maybe its the way I interpret certain wording could be the problem here, I really dont see either Mermi's or Dr Coles wording being near :wiped off the face of the map".
 
I personally dont see much difference in wiped off the map and eliminated from the pages of history...... If your point is that this bloke was misquoted to the exact letter then yes you are probably right, however if your point is that the meaning of his speech has been misquoted then I disagree. His point about Israel is perfectly clear.
 
Alpine Trooper said:
Its been known for some time now that he has been misquoted.

If it was well knowen a quick google new on iran brings up.
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...le&cid=1148507412292&call_pageid=968332188492
quote"Olmert feels particularly threatened by Ahmadinejad's anti-Semitic outbursts and his vow to wipe Israel off the map."
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27265994.shtml
that Israel be “must be wiped out from the map of the world


Almost every article on Iran thats has negative overtures towards it has "wiped of the map" in it.
 
Alpine Trooper said:
Its been known for some time now that he has been misquoted.
Yet it is still, constantly, misquoted. And not just by Faux News but, you know, by the liberal, left wing media. :rolleyes:
 
He is a politician; the ends justify the means.
 
boarder said:
Did Iran's president really call for Israel to be wiped from the map?

Most media and leaders around the world use this statement every day to portray Iran as in the league of Nazi germany, a evil state that just wants to destroy Israel.
But what if he was simply misquoted as it sounds better than what he actually said. And can be used as a justification for doing whatever nations feel like doing to Iran.
I have been doing some research and have found out the following information regarding this speech.
This is his speech as reported by the New York times and seems to be the one that all media sources and goverment leaders quote from
"They say it is not possible to have a world without the United States and Zionism. But you know that this is a possible goal and slogan. Let's take a step back. [[[We had a hostile regime in this country which was undemocratic, armed to the teeth and, with SAVAK, its security apparatus of SAVAK [the intelligence bureau of the Shah of Iran's government] watched everyone. An environment of terror existed.]]] When our dear Imam [Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Iranian revolution] said that the regime must be removed, many of those who claimed to be politically well-informed said it was not possible. All the corrupt governments were in support of the regime when Imam Khomeini started his movement. [[[All the Western and Eastern countries supported the regime even after the massacre of September 7 [1978] ]]] and said the removal of the regime was not possible. But our people resisted and it is 27 years now that we have survived without a regime dependent on the United States. The tyranny of the East and the West over the world should have to end, but weak people who can see only what lies in front of them cannot believe this. Who would believe that one day we could witness the collapse of the Eastern Empire? But we could watch its fall in our lifetime. And it collapsed in a way that we have to refer to libraries because no trace of it is left. Imam [Khomeini] said Saddam must go and he said he would grow weaker than anyone could imagine. Now you see the man who spoke with such arrogance ten years ago that one would have thought he was immortal, is being tried in his own country in handcuffs and shackles [[[by those who he believed supported him and with whose backing he committed his crimes]]]. Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime [Israel] has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world."

And this is the text that was translated by MEMRI which is a middle eastern translation company that translates articles for the western media. And where the NYT gets its ME news from.
"They [ask]: 'Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?' But you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved. [[[...]]] "'When the dear Imam [Khomeini] said that [the Shah's] regime must go, and that we demand a world without dependent governments, many people who claimed to have political and other knowledge [asked], 'Is it possible [that the Shah's regime can be toppled]?' That day, when Imam [Khomeini] began his movement, all the powers supported [the Shah's] corrupt regime [[[...]]] and said it was not possible. However, our nation stood firm, and by now we have, for 27 years, been living without a government dependent on America. Imam [Khomeni] said: 'The rule of the East [U.S.S.R.] and of the West [U.S.] should be ended.' But the weak people who saw only the tiny world near them did not believe it. Nobody believed that we would one day witness the collapse of the Eastern Imperialism [i.e. the U.S.S.R], and said it was an iron regime. But in our short lifetime we have witnessed how this regime collapsed in such a way that we must look for it in libraries, and we can find no literature about it. Imam [Khomeini] said that Saddam [Hussein] must go, and that he would be humiliated in a way that was unprecedented. And what do you see today? A man who, 10 years ago, spoke as proudly as if he would live for eternity is today chained by the feet, and is now being tried in his own country [[[...]]] Imam [Khomeini] said: 'This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history.' This sentence is very wise. The issue of Palestine is not an issue on which we can compromise. Is it possible that an [Islamic] front allows another front [i.e. country] to arise in its [own] heart? This means defeat, and he who accepts the existence of this regime [i.e. Israel] in fact signs the defeat of the Islamic world. In his battle against the World of Arrogance, our dear Imam [Khomeini] set the regime occupying Qods [Jerusalem] as the target of his fight. I do not doubt that the new wave which has begun in our dear Palestine and which today we are also witnessing in the Islamic world is a wave of morality which has spread all over the Islamic world. Very soon, this stain of disgrace [i.e. Israel] will vanish from the center of the Islamic world - and this is attainable."

I highlighted the relevant part.

The term 'map' to which the media refer at length does not even appear. Whereas the 'New York Times' said: "Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map" the version by MEMRI is: "Imam [Khomeini] said: This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history."
A huge difference in respect of headlines which are for example "Iran calls for Israel to be wiped off the map". And is often used when discussing the threat Iran is to Israel, which if it wasnt said is a fallacy to the argument of the threat Iran poses to Israel.

At a later news conference on January 14, 2006, Ahmadinejad claimed his speech had been exaggerated and misinterpreted.
On 20 February 2006, Iran’s foreign minister denied that Tehran wanted to see Israel “wiped off the map,” saying Ahmadinejad had been misunderstood. "Nobody can remove a country from the map. This is a misunderstanding in Europe of what our president mentioned," Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference, speaking in English, after addressing the European Parliament. "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognise legally this regime," he said.

I also noted with interest someone mentioning a article from Dr Juan Cole in another post, anyway, Dr Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, translates the Farsi phrase as:
The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)

Now Memri (Middle East Media Reshearch Institute)translates the same quote as [T]his regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history

So to summarise both Memri and Dr Juan Cole have not mentioned Israel being wiped off the face off the map, and all western media gets there media translations from Memri, so this is obviuosly been mis quoted.

Please note,this in now way means I think Israel's regime should go,I am just trying to get to the truth of what was said.


Links and sources.
http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-603386
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/1727961_comment.php#1727969
http://www.answers.com/topic/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-and-israel
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12949.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmou...Translation_of_phrase_.22Wiped_Off_the_Map.22
www.memri.org


Read this, and see video

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-10-28-iran-israel-protest_x.htm

Also:

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1259994

http://www.intelligence.org.il/eng/bu/iran/img/iran_1_04.pdf

In this one you can see a lot of "Death to Israel" "Death to America" stuff. I don't see it any different than "wipe off the map".

And lastly:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4387206.stm

Do you really believe UN don't have Farsi translators??? DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH.
Even PA authorities condemned Ahmadinejad's rethorics!!!
 
Leha, I am talking about one man and his singular comment, not a bunch of protesters calling for death to America and the usual garbadge they spout.

I do not know if the UN has there own Farsi translators or not, from what I can gather is they just use everything from Mermi.

No links that you showed me actually break down what was said and are just repeating the same "wiped off the map" comments that I have proven not to have been said, if you have links that show what he actually said in a different translation from Farsi to english then please post them so i can look at them, and be proven wrong.
I have only found those two that I have posted,one from Mermi and one from Dr Cole that actually show the translation and that is what i am after to assertain the facts of what he actually said and what is being said that he said.
 
boarder said:
Leha, I am talking about one man and his singular comment, not a bunch of protesters calling for death to America and the usual garbadge they spout.

I do not know if the UN has there own Farsi translators or not, from what I can gather is they just use everything from Mermi.

No links that you showed me actually break down what was said and are just repeating the same "wiped off the map" comments that I have proven not to have been said, if you have links that show what he actually said in a different translation from Farsi to english then please post them so i can look at them, and be proven wrong.

Here, it is very simple. No MEMRI.

http://themiddleeastnow.com/ref/jadspeech

Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement.

Oh, and this is from his own site:

http://www.president.ir/eng/ahmadinejad/cronicnews/1384/08/4/index-e.htm#b3

He further expressed his firm belief that the new wave of confrontations generated in Palestine and the growing turmoil in the Islamic world would in no time wipe Israel away


So....you are wrong and let's leave it here.

Edit: I can't really understand why you are so picky about this or that word. It seems the whole world clearly understood what he ment and he never took his words back. BTW, you like to cite this Juan Cole guy. He is very biased. So if you think Memri is biased, then you should chalk off Juan Cole from source list too.
Also, as you hint "Zionist regime" is not "Israel", you must consider the fact, that Ahmadinejad doesn't have the word "Israel" in vocabulary.
 
Ahh you do realise that first link is the exact copy of what is in my first post being from the New York Times, and on the site it is linked to the NYT. And I said it was from the NYT, its the whole basis for my argument.

And the second post, yes well I have all along said hes a idiot, but its not part of this speech and to do with the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Why am I picky about a word, because of the implications of that word and how they affect the thinking of the population, and can be used to mislead.
 
boarder said:
Ahh you do realise that first link is the exact copy of what is in my first post being from the New York Times, and on the site it is linked to the NYT. And I said it was from the NYT, its the whole basis for my argument.lol

You do realize that you asked me to bring you the translation other than Memri? So while you seem fo fail to notice it in your OWN post, I brought it to your attention again. (Nazila Fathi knows farsi)

And the second post, yes well I have all along said hes a idiot, but its not part of this speech and to do with the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Wait a minute. Wait a minute. This is part of the speech from "World without Zionizm" forum. But if it wasn't, it states the same thing anyway.

Why am I picky about a word, because of the implications of that word and how they affect the thinking of the population, and can be used to mislead.

So, let's make things straight.

"Zionist regime" = "Israel" in Ahmadinejad's vocabulary, this is fact.

There is no difference between "wipe from the map" and "wipe from pages of history". (In my eyes the second is much worse). Stating otherwise is demagogy.

Ahmadinejad never said he was misunderstood. Foregn minister did. So, till Ahmdinejad comes and says he was misunderstood, there is no reason to stop worrying about his intentions.
 
The NYT attributed its source as mermi. As in one of the above links. Your site is a NYT affiliate.

Yes he has, i stated that in my original post at a later news conference on January 14, 2006, Ahmadinejad claimed his speech had been exaggerated and misinterpreted.Also in one of the above links.

Good point about as you hint "Zionist regime" is not "Israel", you must consider the fact, that Ahmadinejad doesn't have the word "Israel" in vocabulary.
 
Back
Top Bottom