"Would you . . . ?" Part Two: Scum and Stammerer. (Presidential Debate Thread)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dismissing everything that makes you uncomfortable with buzzwords is.

Yeah, your posts are all totally original and I haven't read all the same arguments approximately 1,406 times already
 
You say, using "woke".
Not a buzzword, it's a propaganda term invented by the far left (kinda stolen from David Icke which makes it more funny) which became embarrassing once people started using it to accurately describe the gaslighting it was trying to cover.

But no, it's not dismissal. I'm just not playing by the rules you're attempting to impose by all the galloping of the gish, here.

Again it's just evidence that Theov's unfettered free speech spiel doesn't hold up in reality.
I stick to reality whether I like what it means or not because I am living the result of a majority of the populace sticking their heads in the sand and religiously believing that everything will just magically succeed if everyone just "believe" and "share" enough. Also I have an uncomfortable reliance on truth being something to discover instead of shape. I know exactly where all this will end.... and I know why almost no one will believe me but still I am honour-bound to ring out the warning bell anyway.
 
Yeah, your posts are all totally original and I haven't read all the same arguments approximately 1,406 times already
Which only means you have been looking but not seeing for a long time.

Truth never changes, if it does it was never the truth to begin with.
 
Disagreeing with far-right conspiracy theories isn't the same as "not getting it".
BSAB is still just a bog-standard Republican talking point... putting it to a pithy tune doesn't make it any more substantive... more entertaining maybe, but not any more profound.
 
What if I told you I woke up at least a decade before the radical left stole it and started pretending it was about social injustice?

I would say "I believe you believe that."
 
"Both sides are bad," Rambo, if you really don't know.

Here in the US, it generally followed by SVR, so vote Republican.
 
"Both sides are bad," Rambo, if you really don't know.

Here in the US, it generally followed by SVR, so vote Republican.
Oh ok, well that makes strategic sense ATM given that the Republicans have a history of least destruction. Not that I am under the delusion that anything actually separates the two in most ways. If voting was effective it would be illegal, it's all theater in the end.

At this point neither faux side can save what is left of the country, its more about delaying the inevitable. I can't see any way to actually correct the derailment anymore, the only question is how the end will ultimately come... or how long it will take.

Once you give the daneguld you never get rid of the dane.
 
You guys don't get it.... presidential politics are nothing more than reality TV where two sides are set up and manipulated into fighting each other.... it's all a pathetic sham that will inevitably end in bloodshed.

Ok, so who is behind both sides in multiple countries?

Show us your very best red string pinboard.
 
Which right-wingers use as a buzzword to dismiss anything that makes them feel uncomfortable :)

Anyhow, as you were.
Some do sure.... but I have rarely seen it used as a mere buzzword.

Woke originally was promoted as a bastardized version of awake by people that think corruption of language is somehow "cool".... but it always was just an excuse to make up slights for personal and political gain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom