Well how am I supposed to defend myself against the accusation of being inconsistent if I don't know exactly what parts of what I'm saying you are taking issue with?
Fair enough - it's the idea that whereas before you had been setting up moral relativism as an excuse for not passing judgment on the democratic will of voters, you're now saying that passing judgment on the moral positions of others is crucial.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.