Youtube maps of the future Balkans...

His point was that a, as you put it, "triumphalist homogenous nation-state that is achieved through mass murder and exile", i.e. Croatia, is doing pretty good for itself.

Was that due to being a homogenous nation-state or due to other factors.


Last I heard, if Belgium were to break up, Flanders wouldn't be bombed by NATO back into the stone age.

Like I said, masquerading.
 
Virote_Considon said:
Last I heard, if Belgium were to break up, Flanders wouldn't be bombed by NATO back into the stone age.
Wouldn't that be something?
 
Last I heard, if Belgium were to break up, Flanders wouldn't be bombed by NATO back into the stone age.

The NATO top brass would be pretty stupid to bomb their own weekend houses on the coast.:p
 
In Czechoslovakia and Poland, it was relatively "mild", meaning we didn't kill all those Germans, we just expelled them in a "civilized" manner after "they" occupied us to "civilize" us.)

we keep hearing that in May 1945 , at least one German woman and her children were tied together with barbed wire and thrown into a river in Prague . Are there any rivers in Prague ?

sorry , ı missed the sarcasm initially .
 
The rise of ethnic nationalism is what prompted the collapse of Ottoman control in the Balkans, and it was the local Communist Dictators who kept it in check. Trying to blame the mess in the Balkans on the Ottomans would be like blaming the United Nations for not stopping WWII.

No. Aaaagain, the Ottoman occupation/colonization of the Balkans is the reason this region's development was ******** for centuries, separated from the European mainstream (-> renaissance, reformation, religious civil wars, enlightenment, nationalistic wars, liberalism). It gradually seeped into the Balkans as the Ottomans weakened due to their utter inability to embrace modernism in time, and so when the Ottoman Empire collapsed, it exploded into a series of war and strife. It eventually triggered WW1, then calmed down a little, exploded again during WW2, then calmed down a lot during the Communist era, and then finally exploded for the (as of yet) last time in the 1990s. Basically, the Balkans needed to catch up with centuries of history which it was denied by the Ottomans. Turkey did nothing to actually solve the existing conflicts there, it just wasn't aware of them, ignored them, used them to its own advantage, and sometimes created new ones. It was a suffocating empire which pretty much screwed up every region it touched, the Balkans most of all.

What we've seen there recently is a legacy of that.

Last I heard, if Belgium were to break up, Flanders wouldn't be bombed by NATO back into the stone age.

If it surrounded Brussels with heavy artillery and started bombing it, killing the Walloons en masse, maybe it would. Even if only because NATO HQ is located there ;)

we keep hearing that in May 1945 , at least one German woman and her children were tied together with barbed wire and thrown into a river in Prague . Are there any rivers in Prague ?

Nah, no rivers :crazyeye:

Much worse things happened during the expulsions, thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of Germans were killed, it's hard to say exactly how many. Men, women, children, old people, POWs... The issue was taboo during the Communist era, and in the early 1990s people were shouted down if they tried to open a debate about it (because there was a fear that the newly unified Germany might turn revisionist and demand compensation). Only in the last ~10 years have this been discussed, and increasingly the public is being made aware of all the atrocities that were committed by Czechs (usually those who didn't lift a finger during the war) on Germans. Recently a film footage was found showing Germans being shot and then run over by trucks. Several mass graves have been uncovered.

There is still a long way to go for the average Czech to be able to face this part of our recent history, though. A lot of people are still too blinded by knee-jerk nationalism to admit the post-war expulsions were an act of mass-scale ethnic cleansing.
 
The role of the Ustaše during WW2 probably stoked up ethnic tensions more than anything else

Interestingly from wiki

Ustaše also saw the Islam of Bosniaks as a religion which "keeps true the blood of Croats"
 
Serbia Stronk!
 
Basically, the Balkans needed to catch up with centuries of history which it was denied by the Ottomans.

Being denied centuries of sectarian butchering and dynastic warfare is a good thing.

The issue here is that you see history essentially as a linear, fated narrative.


Turkey did nothing to actually solve the existing conflicts there, it just wasn't aware of them, ignored them, used them to its own advantage, and sometimes created new ones.

If the only way to solve conflict is to brutally subsumed a population into a single culture by forced assimilation, expulsion or murder, then the conflict may better remain unsolved.
 
I meant lesser evil to the Bosnian Catholic and Muslim population, because the Serb paramilitary was also genocidal, then you have the 13th Waffen SS Handschar Division, that was Bosnian Muslim and that supposedly committed genocide against the Serbs. The Balkans are screwed up, you cant really explain it.
 
I suppose that's why Tito ended up so popular. Whatever you thought of his politics, at least he wasn't trying to commit genocide.
 
Being denied centuries of sectarian butchering and dynastic warfare is a good thing.

And you keep missing my point, by now entirely on purpose. If sectarian butchering and nationalist-driven warfare is bound to happen, then it better happen when the pinnacle of military technology is the arquebus, culverin, and a 6 metre pike and the population is 10 times smaller than today. With some luck, it will make people more averse to do the same later with AK-47s, machine guns, MLRS, jet fighters, and poison gas, to a much larger number of people.

The issue here is that you see history essentially as a linear, fated narrative.

I don't - I am just being realistic. If you choose to believe in some multicultural utopia where enlightened leaders lead people to forget about their ages-old hatreds and suspicions and live in mutual respect and peace forever, be my guest. It's just that something like that probably never occurred in recorded history, certainly not in a region as complicated as the Balkans.

If the only way to solve conflict is to brutally subsumed a population into a single culture by forced assimilation, expulsion or murder, then the conflict may better remain unsolved.

Great. If you think that your contrarianism here substitutes for an argument, or perhaps even a suggestion of a counter-hypothesis, you're sorely mistaken. There are of course ways to solve conflicts in less brutal ways, but Turkey wasn't any more interested in doing that than the colonials powers were in Africa. Why? If the natives hate each other more than they hate you, all is fine and dandy.
 
What do you mean? Those videos offer potentially hours of cheap entertainment :D
Although i bet the comments get recycled once in a while. Mostly "Greece-Serbia-Russia-Bulgaria= Orthodox brothers!" or the analogous antithetical sentiment ;)
Why did you omit Romania!?
 
Back
Top Bottom