We don't, but I was responding to sanabas that was arguing that Zeno version was a paradox because it could really happen in RL ( unlike my version that in his opinion cannot happen IRL ). I don't know any bosonic turtle, so I assumed that both the turtle and the arrow were fermionic

If both the objects are fermionic, Pauli exclusion principle does apply...
OFC that we can devise a version of the paradox with bosonic particles, but even then it is highly discussible that we should consider any distance inferior to the Planck lenght to the sum of the series terms... In the end the situation is the same: in RL and as long as we are talking of divisions of space, we can't go to infinite and still be talking inside our current understanding of physics. Time, OTOH is another piece of pie ...
P.S. My point is that Zeno's paradox as stated in the "original" ( better said, Aristotle references to him in this case ) form is not congruent with the current knowledge of physics. You might think on it as a
Gedankenexperiment, thought or postulate a physics where space is infinitely divisible without change of properties.