19 Civilizations, lets vote! PART 3!

Which civs would you like to see in cIV? PLEASE vote for 2(two) civs ONLY!

  • Maya

    Votes: 10 12.7%
  • Byzantines

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Israel

    Votes: 14 17.7%
  • Ethiopia

    Votes: 9 11.4%
  • Ottomans

    Votes: 16 20.3%
  • Mongols

    Votes: 19 24.1%
  • Iroquois

    Votes: 11 13.9%
  • Incas

    Votes: 9 11.4%
  • Zulus

    Votes: 10 12.7%
  • Celts

    Votes: 15 19.0%
  • Carthaginians

    Votes: 11 13.9%
  • Dutch

    Votes: 14 17.7%
  • Portugal

    Votes: 7 8.9%
  • Quebec

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Siam

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Mali

    Votes: 6 7.6%
  • Tibet

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Brazil

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Poland

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Ukraine

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    79
  • Poll closed .
I'd say Russia and France would be next on the inclusion list.
 
I realize this thread is pretty much useless now and the poll is done, but why wasn't Austria on your list? Austria has never been in a Civ game and I have no idea why. In terms of peak power, historical significance and especially culture, Austria is way ahead of just about all of the candidates you listed... I live in Quebec and even I know that's a terrible idea for a civ!

Even with the 32 civs after ptw and conquests, Austria was still left out. And don't say it was because the game already had too many European civs. Geographic diversity was obviously not an issue because there were seven civs crammed into the middle east (Sumerians?!).
This time around, let's give the Hapsburgs the respect they so sorely deserve.
 
Theres all kinds of oddities on that list. England are not on it for one. They only had the largest Empire in history, have contributed alot scientifically, was the home of the industrial revolution and have been a recognised civilization since aboit 500AD known as the Britons at that point. Celts made it tho but i agree that the Celts should be on there.
 
Originally posted by Urederra
I know that in many places this is not recognized, mainly because they tend to separate Spain from Portugal, but during Philip the second, Portugal (and its empire) was part of Spain. Many of those places are english biased historians, where they try to demonstrate that the British empire was the largest ever, so they don´t take the joint of the Spanish and portuguese empires under Philip the second reign into consideration. But the fact is that Portugal was part of Spain between 1556-1598 and therefore, the spanish empire at its peak was larger than the british one.

Karl V and Phillip II were Habsburg and therefore ruled the Austrian Empire which included Spain, Netherlands, Milan and the colonies. So much for biased history...

I would love to have Austria included since we have a very distinct and long history. If the Ottomans are included Austria is a must-have.

Germany, however was not much of a power before the rise of Prussia long after Austria had established its empire. - I say replace Germany with Austria... ;)
 
Hmm i agree but removing Germany would be a poor choice. Austria have a place thats true but i would remove one of the others from that list first.
 
What about Canada? I think that they should be in. I mean, they are a great country. And why Quebec? Or is that supposed to mean Canada too?
 
as a canadian..i would like to see them..but i think there are far superior choices for a civ then canada...and if they were to remove any of the 18 from the list for canada..i think i would be dissapointed..but be careful..bringing up canada in any of these threads usaully causes an uproar
 
Originally posted by Mr. Blonde
Germany, however was not much of a power before the rise of Prussia long after Austria had established its empire. - I say replace Germany with Austria... ;)

Sorry if someone took this as serious suggestion (the smiley should have suggested otherwise).
However, I say Austria is at least as relevant as Spain, the Netherlands or the Ottoman empire and you would need it for scenarios from 14th century up to WWI anyhow. I don´t mind if they are not in the original release but I would like them at least for an expansion. I am quite positive that someone will mod them, I hope the leaderheads don´t prove themself as hindrance. I suggest Karl V or Maria Theresia as leaders.
 
Knight-Dragon said:
Because Austria is a German power?

I think America is far more "English" than Austria is German. And I think the Dutch, who were in conquests, are far more German than Austria is.

What would be Canada's UU? Maybe a really cheap helicopter that falls apart...
 
... maybe Canada could have the special ability of buy units from other civs after those units have become obsolete.
 
A mountie on a ski doo..lol..

about the austria thing..i think the problem with adding a civ like that is the precident it sets...people of scottish decent will say they shouldnt be included as english and ukrainians will not want to be part of russia and soo on. not to say the dont deserve a spot..its just that they cant make everyone happy..so why try
 
george_manet said:
... maybe Canada could have the special ability of buy units from other civs after those units have become obsolete.


Thats very mean but i love it. Then i see what part of the world you are from and that makes its even funnier. Great sense of humour score 10 points.
 
Superkrest said:
... people of scottish decent will say they shouldnt be included as english and ukrainians will not want to be part of russia and soo on.

I agree that the Scots and the Ukranians are distinct peoples with distinct cultures, but politically they are parts of Great Britain and Russia (well, the Ukranians were a part of Russia for a long time). But the only time Austria was ever a part of Germany was from 1938 to 1945, and during that period Germany controlled lots of areas that weren't necessarily German...

Thanks for the 10 points, Himalia. Where do I go to redeam them for a prize?
 
They can be traded in for obselete weapons :lol:

Ten points can be traded in for a submarine with a sunroof.
 
The problem, George, is that you're focusing on the NATION Germany. Austria, indeed, should not be accounted part of that.

But the historical German civilization? Historically, Austria was pretty much always part of that. The Roman Empire of the German Nation (better known as Holy Roman Empire) pretty much always included Vienna, Salzburg and so forth, from its founding some time after the Death of Charlemagne to its death at the hands of Napoléon nearly a millenium later.

Even after that happened, Austria was not out of Germany. Austria was still Prussia's major rival in vying for influence over the rest of Germany in the 19th century; Prussia ultimately won over Germany while Austria was forced to focus on its eastern territories (Hungary, etc).

Now granted, Germay led by Bismark or Hitler and with Panzer UUs is rather questionable for Austria.
 
Mr. Blonde said:
Karl V and Phillip II were Habsburg and therefore ruled the Austrian Empire which included Spain, Netherlands, Milan and the colonies. So much for biased history...


Phillip II was born in Valladolid, Spain. And the country he ruled was Spain. The general trend in Spain was to consider everything that belonged to the empire part of Spain, not a separated colony. :)
 
Phillip II NEVER ruled Austria. When Karl V abdicated he split his territories between the Spanish Empire and the HRE; Phillip became ruler of Spain and Ferdinand (Karl's brother) took over the HRE, splitting the Hapsburg into two branches.
 
supern00b said:
Quebec?!?...That's just silly...

Agreed.

A Quebec option over a Canadian option?
 
The Austrians were the 32nd civ in Conquests. Remember?
Charles V ruled Spain (which includes America) while he was the Holy Roman Emperor.
 
Back
Top Bottom