mr_lewington
King
meh saw...lol in my books it doesnt classify as a horror, rather a torture genre
my opinion though

meh saw...lol in my books it doesnt classify as a horror, rather a torture genremy opinion though
I liked the suspense triller of the first over the action horror of the second. But I've seen more zombie movies then most people have seen movies so the different style was nice.
I think that the ending was exactly what it portrayed. The young boy came over from England and infected people, one way or another, in France, causing the outbreak that was to (presumably) spread throughout Eurasia. Africa could possibly be protected with a defensive stand on the Sinai. Some more remote areas in Siberia and Central Asia would likely survive the initial wave. The islands of Oceania, including Australia and New Zealand, would probably survive. The Americas are not immediately threatened.
28 Months Later? Anyone?
Thats probably gonna be how it plays out.
However, in reality (Which I know this is not) such an Infection could be kept at bay quite easily. The Infected are not zombies... The die as we do.
Get a bunch of tanks and the Infection could be destroyed easily. Supported by Strategic Bombing, Ground Infantry and ect. It would be easily detained.
But it'd be at a large loss. Presumably to contain it, western Europe, or even the whole of Europe would have to be quarantined and destroyed.However, in reality (Which I know this is not) such an Infection could be kept at bay quite easily. The Infected are not zombies... The die as we do.
Get a bunch of tanks and the Infection could be destroyed easily. Supported by Strategic Bombing, Ground Infantry and ect. It would be easily detained.
But it'd be at a large loss. Presumably to contain it, western Europe, or even the whole of Europe would have to be quarantined and destroyed.
I'd find it hard to believe that Europe could coordinate a massive counteroffensive against Infected France on short notice. I could possibly see the Spanish & Portugese with support of the Free French holding a defensive position against the Infected French at the Pyrenees, but that is unlikely to succeed.
Scandinavia might have enough time to draw defensive lines at the Finnish-Russian border, but even that is unlikely to work.
Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Corsica, Siciliy and other Mediterranean Islands may be safe from attack.
The problem is though, like in 28 Weeks Later, if one of your own soldiers gets infected, then it becomes hard to tell who is and is not infected. I am not saying that it would be impossible, but in a population dense area like Europe, it would be pretty damn hard to fight that kind of war. I just don't think that the Europeans have it in them.
I think the US should play it safe and nuke all of Europe.
Most likely just Western Europe... Spain might make it if properly fortified.
All they need to do is block off France. The Infected travel by foot, and most of the time, if there is nothing around to attack then it will simple stumble around.
Taking this into consideration, Germany could have time to mobolize... Spain and Italy will have more time as they are guarded by the Alps.
I'd find it hard to believe that Europe could coordinate a massive counteroffensive against Infected France on short notice. I could possibly see the Spanish & Portugese with support of the Free French holding a defensive position against the Infected French at the Pyrenees, but that is unlikely to succeed.
Scandinavia might have enough time to draw defensive lines at the Finnish-Russian border, but even that is unlikely to work.
Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Corsica, Siciliy and other Mediterranean Islands may be safe from attack.