28 weeks later ending

meh saw...lol in my books it doesnt classify as a horror, rather a torture genre:lol: my opinion though

The original Saw was far from a Torture Movie.

I suppose some spoilers ahead***

Trap 1 (Razor Wire Trap)
Ultimately, this does not involve any real torture. The trap was simple enough, however he paniced and rushed head first into the wire ultimatly causing his death.

Trap 2 (Flammable Jelly Trap)
Again, this trap involved patience. Had he stayed calm, he could have survived. Instead he decided to rush, Jigsaw told him the posion was slow acting, making me guess he had a good bit of time. Instead he decided to hurry and ultimatly burned himself.

Trap 3 (Reverse Bear Trap)
Amanda's test was much diffrent. While the earlier two has to hurt themselves to move forward, she had to hurt another (though, unknowingly) No torture involved.

Trap 4 (The "Famous" Bathroom Trap)
This trap is ultimatly the closet one to torture, but not physical torture, mental torture. This game, patience was not the answer. Had Gordon killed Adam he might have won... in the end Gordon supposedly escaped. The movie ended with a great twist.

No real torture...
 
I liked the suspense triller of the first over the action horror of the second. But I've seen more zombie movies then most people have seen movies so the different style was nice.

I would go with that, but I kind of felt the first film had a point while the second was just for the sake of it.

For a Horror movie to really work it has to have it's claws into something deeper. 28 Weeks was the best horror I've seen in a couple of years, but I have to say thats more a judgement on the couple of years than the movie.
 
I don't really understand, that in the first they didn't come out during the daytime but in the second they could?

Maybe it's like B_T_M said and the virus evolved, but that's a leap.
 
the infected come out whenever, the reason they went out during the day was cuse u'd be able 2 see the infected better and for the infected the time of day makes no difference
 
I think that the ending was exactly what it portrayed. The young boy came over from England and infected people, one way or another, in France, causing the outbreak that was to (presumably) spread throughout Eurasia. Africa could possibly be protected with a defensive stand on the Sinai. Some more remote areas in Siberia and Central Asia would likely survive the initial wave. The islands of Oceania, including Australia and New Zealand, would probably survive. The Americas are not immediately threatened.

28 Months Later? Anyone?
 
I think that the ending was exactly what it portrayed. The young boy came over from England and infected people, one way or another, in France, causing the outbreak that was to (presumably) spread throughout Eurasia. Africa could possibly be protected with a defensive stand on the Sinai. Some more remote areas in Siberia and Central Asia would likely survive the initial wave. The islands of Oceania, including Australia and New Zealand, would probably survive. The Americas are not immediately threatened.

28 Months Later? Anyone?

Thats probably gonna be how it plays out.

However, in reality (Which I know this is not) such an Infection could be kept at bay quite easily. The Infected are not zombies... The die as we do.

Get a bunch of tanks and the Infection could be destroyed easily. Supported by Strategic Bombing, Ground Infantry and ect. It would be easily detained.
 
Thats probably gonna be how it plays out.

However, in reality (Which I know this is not) such an Infection could be kept at bay quite easily. The Infected are not zombies... The die as we do.

Get a bunch of tanks and the Infection could be destroyed easily. Supported by Strategic Bombing, Ground Infantry and ect. It would be easily detained.


The problem is though, like in 28 Weeks Later, if one of your own soldiers gets infected, then it becomes hard to tell who is and is not infected. I am not saying that it would be impossible, but in a population dense area like Europe, it would be pretty damn hard to fight that kind of war. I just don't think that the Europeans have it in them.
 
However, in reality (Which I know this is not) such an Infection could be kept at bay quite easily. The Infected are not zombies... The die as we do.

Get a bunch of tanks and the Infection could be destroyed easily. Supported by Strategic Bombing, Ground Infantry and ect. It would be easily detained.
But it'd be at a large loss. Presumably to contain it, western Europe, or even the whole of Europe would have to be quarantined and destroyed.
 
But it'd be at a large loss. Presumably to contain it, western Europe, or even the whole of Europe would have to be quarantined and destroyed.

Most likely just Western Europe... Spain might make it if properly fortified.

All they need to do is block off France. The Infected travel by foot, and most of the time, if there is nothing around to attack then it will simple stumble around.

Taking this into consideration, Germany could have time to mobolize... Spain and Italy will have more time as they are guarded by the Alps.
 
I'd find it hard to believe that Europe could coordinate a massive counteroffensive against Infected France on short notice. I could possibly see the Spanish & Portugese with support of the Free French holding a defensive position against the Infected French at the Pyrenees, but that is unlikely to succeed.

Scandinavia might have enough time to draw defensive lines at the Finnish-Russian border, but even that is unlikely to work.

Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Corsica, Siciliy and other Mediterranean Islands may be safe from attack.
 
I'd find it hard to believe that Europe could coordinate a massive counteroffensive against Infected France on short notice. I could possibly see the Spanish & Portugese with support of the Free French holding a defensive position against the Infected French at the Pyrenees, but that is unlikely to succeed.

Scandinavia might have enough time to draw defensive lines at the Finnish-Russian border, but even that is unlikely to work.

Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Corsica, Siciliy and other Mediterranean Islands may be safe from attack.

But like I said, they will travel alot slower and on foot...

It has been 28 Weeks since the Infection first began... surely the Governments will understand the seriousness of the situation and order evacuations and set up lines of defence.

You must also consider the use of Rivers as defencive barriers. (Which also raises the question... Can the water supply be tainted by the Infection)
 
All it would take is for one person to breach the blockade or get in to safety while infected and there you go. And isn't that how every zombie move is?
 
I think the US should play it safe and nuke all of Europe.
 
The problem is though, like in 28 Weeks Later, if one of your own soldiers gets infected, then it becomes hard to tell who is and is not infected. I am not saying that it would be impossible, but in a population dense area like Europe, it would be pretty damn hard to fight that kind of war. I just don't think that the Europeans have it in them.

We've defeated zombies in the past and we'll do it again, if we have to.
 
I think the US should play it safe and nuke all of Europe.

The damage to the atmosphere and the radioactive cloud that it would produce would be counter-productive. The solution is to allow Eurasia and Africa to be engulfed by the virus and quarentine the continents with the massive naval power available to the Americas. The quarentine would remain in effect for one hundred and twenty years, with exception to combat units sent to guard engineering teams to man the oil infrastructure of the Middle East.

After the first 90 years of the quarentine, you then send research and recon teams en masse to search for any sign of infected individuals or other life forms and if none are found, you re-open the continent to settlement at the end of the 120 year quarentine period.
 
Most likely just Western Europe... Spain might make it if properly fortified.

All they need to do is block off France. The Infected travel by foot, and most of the time, if there is nothing around to attack then it will simple stumble around.

Taking this into consideration, Germany could have time to mobolize... Spain and Italy will have more time as they are guarded by the Alps.

They all could. But to be very careful I'd move the defensive line back a little to ensure they'd have time to set it up before any infected reach the borders. Spain and Portugal could guard the choke point at the Pyrennes, while the rest of Europe Barricades France and the surrounding area. Belgium, the Netherlands, And maybe Switzerland would be either immediately evaced or abandoned.

And I would move EVERY non military personnel into Eastern Europe. The less people there the more easily they could contain an infection if it did find it's way out of France.
I'd find it hard to believe that Europe could coordinate a massive counteroffensive against Infected France on short notice. I could possibly see the Spanish & Portugese with support of the Free French holding a defensive position against the Infected French at the Pyrenees, but that is unlikely to succeed.

Scandinavia might have enough time to draw defensive lines at the Finnish-Russian border, but even that is unlikely to work.

Cyprus, Crete, Sardinia, Corsica, Siciliy and other Mediterranean Islands may be safe from attack.

I don't see how it would be unlikely, Infected die like we die in this movie, for all we know in the Pyrennes they could starve trying to get over the mountains or in Scandinavia they might Freeze to death, not being intelligent enough to protect themselves from the cold.
 
:agree:
I agree wholeheartedly with the above statement.
 
Back
Top Bottom