3.8 Non-Congress Changes Discussion

Keep or change these balance changes:

  • Byzantium - keep the new change

    Votes: 20 34.5%
  • Byzantium - revert the new change

    Votes: 13 22.4%
  • Byzantium - block Byzantium from building 2 reformation wonders

    Votes: 15 25.9%
  • Byzantium - block Byzantium from picking anything other than 2 founders

    Votes: 13 22.4%
  • Border Growth - keep the new change

    Votes: 18 31.0%
  • Border Growth - revert the new change

    Votes: 22 37.9%
  • Conquistadors are settler units

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Conquistadors are military units that can settle

    Votes: 44 75.9%
  • Byzantium - block Byzantium from picking 2 founders

    Votes: 12 20.7%

  • Total voters
    58
hi there, I noticed the change in byzantium (version 3.9.1) and found the reason here. Something not discussed in this thread is that byzantium can no longer make super holy sites. Was that considered OP, and if so should it be discussed? My impression is that super holy sites are more useful for tradition byzantium for their very focused yields, and tall byzantium may be quite niche already compared to wide byzantium. I'm a bit sad to see that go away, if it's not for obvious balance reasons. I did not follow the whole story, if the issue was having too many WC votes, and not the access to the two wonders, why not simply leaving things untouched?
it's ok just propose it in world congress in 15 more days and get enough people on ur side.
 
ok I need to understand a bit how the congress works :) (yup it's been a while)

I also ask because I'm not playing enough to have an opinion on (deity) balance
 
Top Bottom