Who will be Mitt Romney's Running Mate?

Dreadnought

Deity
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
6,945
Location
New Jersey, USA
With Romney more or less guaranteed to win the nomination, who will he select to be his running mate in the general election in November?

There are several people whose names have been thrown into the mix. One prevailing view is that Romney may pick a safe candidate to avoid the Palin fiasco four years ago. This list is by no means conclusive, but with that said, who do you think will be the VP candidate?

  • Marco Rubio: A rising star and Hispanic, Rubio could be used to bring Hispanic votes to the ticket in addition to the state of Florida. I've heard mixed rumors about this though, because Rubio may not want to be the VP candidate, and he is untested against the media on a national scale.

  • Paul Ryan: A favored representative from a swing state (Wisconsin), he is also keenly focused on economic affairs, thus avoiding the cauldron of social issues that Santorum is stirring. May be an interesting pick if the economy spirals downward later in the year.

  • Bob McDonnell: A potential frontrunner in this sweepstakes. Comes from another swing state (one that admittedly isn't as difficult to win than, say, Florida), has done a good job as governor, and has seemed immune to media attacks. He also totes an honorable military background, one that Romney has praised before. He has only been in office two years, though.

  • Chris Christie: His name is always thrown into the mix. However, he is from the same national region as Romney, doesn't guarantee the state of New Jersey at all, and may not be the best fit as VP.

  • John Thune: He has also been named as a potential VP. Comes from the heartlands, which has a few battleground states, and is very charismatic and easygoing. Does he bring enough to the ticket, though?

  • Bobby Jindal: A rising star from Louisiana. Conservative, safe, and intelligent, he won't be an easy target for the media. He'll also shore up the Southern vote. He's young though (40 years old) and may not be experienced enough for the role.

  • Allan West: Only recently thrown into the mix in an interview of Sarah Palin, he still seems to be a capable choice nonetheless. He has an extensive military and foreign policy background, knows a great deal about the Constitution, and won't do anything stupid on the campaign trail. Plus, he looks like CEO Nwabudike Morgan from Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. He's only been recently mentioned, though, and by none other than Palin, so take that with a grain of salt.

  • Mitch Daniels: A potential presidential candidate before he decided not to run. Has been known to speak hard truths about certain subjects, and comes from a relatively important state (Indiana). Is he safe enough though?

  • Tim Pawlenty: The quintessential safe pick. Comes from Minnesota, a potential swing state, and is extremely loyal. Totally lacking in charisma, though, so he may make the total ticket too drab.

  • Susana Martinez: A Hispanic governor from an important swing state (New Mexico). The first female Hispanic governor, but has very little experience.


(No poll has been added due to the sheer number of possible VP candidates).
 
Rubio simply because he provides the double whammy of appeals to an important minority and appeals to a battle ground state. If not Rubio pick a random candidate from a swing state who is vanilla enough to not offend or embarrass like Palin did. Id say Paul Ryan shouldnt be considered since I dont get the impression his budget plan is popular outside conservatives therefore risks rebuffing moderates and independents. Palin... come on this is the serious forum, no jokes please.
 
Wikipedia said:
Martinez, along with U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), has frequently been mentioned as a potential Latino running mate for the eventual GOP nominee, though she has promised to refuse the position if offered.

So she's out as well.
 
I would expect Rubio to be a top pick. But I don't know that he would accept the nod. If it really looks like Mitt will lose, and lose bad, then there's a lot of reason to not be associated with it. But the other factor is the higher profile of the pick afterward.
 
My guess is a generic guy from a potential swing state . . . someone that may want to position themselves as "next in line" for 2016, but won't get tarnished by the association with Romney. Could be Pawlenty.
 
Another outside possibility who has been mentioned is Luis Fortuño, the Republican Governor of Puerto Rico. Rubio would be a good choice, as locking down Florida is necessary for any Republican to win. Ryan would be an equally good choice.

I love Mitch Daniels, but calling Indiana an "important swing state" on the Presidential level is a bit of a stretch. It was a virtual tie in 2008 and is a lock for Romney in 2012.

You got it right by having Rubio and Ryan as the two best choices. Ryan in particular is a formidable debater; I would pay money to see him take Biden apart like a child at the Vice Presidential debate.
 
  • Marco Rubio: A rising star and Hispanic, Rubio could be used to bring Hispanic votes to the ticket in addition to the state of Florida. I've heard mixed rumors about this though, because Rubio may not want to be the VP candidate, and he is untested against the media on a national scale.

Isn't it sad that someone's ethnicity is considered an electoral quality?
 
Isn't it sad that someone's ethnicity is considered an electoral quality?
I think it's more that it would be seen as a guarantee that a potential Romney administration would not possess the anti-Hispanic orientation that many Hispanic voters associated with the Republican Party, rather than voters simply preferring a given candidate because of his ethnicity. (There's a reason that the Hispanic vote, traditionally split by the combination of low average socio-economic status and religious/cultural conservatism, has been so heavily Democratic in the last few years.) It would primarily be about not turning Hispanic voters away, rather than bringing them in.
 
Rubio is a solid pick, although my friends were discussing Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice (sp?), both of whom have foreign policy experience to cover Romney's lack thereof, and both have survived the Bush years with higher favorability than the others from the Bush administration. Problem is, I don't think they are likely to accept the offer.

Indiana is already leaning Republican, I would assume they would go for a state like Florida or Virginia if they take that route. So Bob McDonnell isn't a bad guess.
 
I'd say the most likely choices would be the first four on that list, but if I had to make a prediction I'd say Marco Rubio. But Christie is certainly possible and probably has the most potential to bring in independents due to Ryan's controversial economically conservative policies and McDonnell's controversial socially conservative policies.
 
What the heck does "safe" mean in this context anyway?
 
Ah. Thanks. Well in that case I'm hoping Marco Rubio. Seems like a good guy to me.
 
Hopefully either Ron Paul or Sarah Palin.
 
Hopefully either Ron Paul or Sarah Palin.

I actually think Ron Paul would be a relatively good VP. Considering who you are and the context of your post, I'm assuming you think he would be a bad VP choice. Why do you think this?
 
My guess is a generic guy from a potential swing state . . . someone that may want to position themselves as "next in line" for 2016, but won't get tarnished by the association with Romney. Could be Pawlenty.

This also makes me think Paul Ryan a little bit.
 
I actually think Ron Paul would be a relatively good VP. Considering who you are and the context of your post, I'm assuming you think he would be a bad VP choice. Why do you think this?

His stance on:

Rape Victims
Black people
Homosexuals

Are evil and disgusting (check his newsletters for his bigoted views).
 
Back
Top Bottom