Afforess
The White Wizard
Hover over your flag on the bottom interface, and see what version it reports. Those civics have definitely been removed.
A New Dawn Beta Builds
- Thread starter 45°38'N-13°47'E
- Start date
Hover over your flag on the bottom interface, and see what version it reports. Those civics have definitely been removed.
Dancing Hoskuld
Deity
Hovering over any unit graphic causes the crash. If you go to the units list you will only see 2 or 3 units!
It works fine if you go into a game. It is making my testing take 5 times as long. Since I like to test that the unit graphics work in the pedia first before trying a game.
Interesting. I have not yet reproduced the crash, but when I open the Sevopedia from the mod main menu (beofe loading a game) it behaves oddly. For example it only has 2 units in it! Digging now...
Thanks. For some reason it's still 1.75B. I guess I'll try running the patch again. Mine's the Steam client version if that helps at all.
Nevermind. Just saw that for some reason it created a separate "Rise of Mankind - A New Dawn" folder in the ROMAND folder I had pointed it to. Are the only changed files in the Assets directory?
Hovering over any unit graphic causes the crash. If you go to the units list you will only see 2 or 3 units!
It works fine if you go into a game. It is making my testing take 5 times as long. Since I like to test that the unit graphics work in the pedia first before trying a game.
Found and fixed. Expect to see this in the next beta release (soon (TM))
Afforess
The White Wizard
AND Beta 5 is up.
Changes:
A lot of bug fixes and balancing
CTD fixes from Koshling
New Save format from Koshling
Changes:
A lot of bug fixes and balancing
CTD fixes from Koshling
New Save format from Koshling
strategyonly
C2C Supreme Commander
I guess he problem was solved???
Afforess
The White Wizard
Fix is already in Beta 5. I was the one who fixed it - Koshling pointed out the issue in the code.
Fix is already in Beta 5. I was the one who fixed it - Koshling pointed out the issue in the code.
bravo .
where it is uploaded
Download AND 1.75->1.76 Beta 4 upgrade installer
hey affores have you fixed the wrong models that some units had(medieval spearman hoplite model......
strategyonly
C2C Supreme Commander
Fix is already in Beta 5. I was the one who fixed it - Koshling pointed out the issue in the code.
Well then nice work. Didnt know, you didnt PM me back.
Arkatakor
King
Ever had this happen to you with railroads built in your territory and putting up with a cavalry invasion? This needs to be thought through further. I know I said we need to beef up incentive for people to use mounted warfare but there is no need to go overboard lol
Faster growth is always a better thing. Again consider a city that has rampant unhealthyness and NOTHING left to build (minus doctors office / aqueduct) and chooses NOT to build those buildings when in desperate need of them.
Was unawere of this; will try it out. It would be an idea to mention that Despotism, Monarchy, and Fascism give fixed borders in the civics screen. Here is another idea (if it can easily be implemented):
Regardless of civic's, apply the fixed borders rule to captured cities. Have the fixed border rule to that captured city expire after some 50-100 turns (normal game speed) OR when your population percentage exceeds the population of the captured civ. Just a thought.
Then we agree to disagree; having free irrigation canals BEFORE the technology was even available to build it (city planning) to spur your civilizations growth early game was awesome. Graveyards, while nice, simply dont compare in that regard. That said as it is, civs that have lots of river tiles in them definitely have too much advantage as opposed to those who start out in the middle of a jungle at the edge of a continent. Thats the only drawback to the river canals approach.
Hmmm... ima think this thru a bit more; I am thinking we can use an existing model (one of those future era defensive units, the one that looks like the APC from Alien's). If you are up for it I can come up with a tech to include it with and a list of buildings that it would deploy upon founding a city.
Nice work on fixing the other issues; thanks!
Also has the mountaineering promotion changes I discussed in another thread.
szemek77
Prince
But there is still vassalage civic in military section.
First impressions: the game is not easy any more. It becomes more and more difficult each beta
I was doing pretty well on monarch in beta4, but I can't keep the pace on beta5. Generally nice balancing, but the unhealthiness problem becomes ridiculous now. Seems like you can't chop your forrests anymore I'm impressed with the civic changes: it is not an easy path anymore. Keep up great job!
I also appreciate that the game goes smoothly. Speed improvements is real!
Afforess
The White Wizard
More than that even - but I was really tired and heading to bed when the upload finished.
DrewBledsoe
Veteran QB
Totally agree with this point. I also don't see why horseback troops should logically be able to use enemy roads, when foot soldiers can't. The gunpowder age+ Horse Troops are quite well balanced, and don't need a commando buff. It's the earlier ones that do need some kind of boost. I'd still opt for something like a bonus vs melee and/or first strikes, given the horse's dominance over foot soldiers (except massed spears/pikes) throughout history
Unless the faster growth will cause uncontrollable unhappiness, I don't think this point can be argued against. I would never let the ai manage a city building queue for me,
, but sometimes in mid/late game let the ai govs control the tile management......and find its stagnating growth in weird and wonderful ways. I'll keep 'em happy Mr Governor, you just keep 'em breeding I have to go with Afforess on this. Maybe it's the maps I play, but if 5 of your first 6 cities are using mostly riverside tiles, and you build the old irrigation canal Pyramids, you've already won (see earlier post of mine in suggestion and balancing thread). If 3 of the 6 cities are just "off riverside" - for better longterm placement - and now have a free irrigation canal, which they would never have been able to build otherwise, then you've even more benefit.
I like your ideas and comments Arkatakor (highly constructive) as I'm sure Afforess does too (and face it, it's what he thinks that counts
)I'm sure I'll have some of my own, when I get this pesky new house sorted out, and can get back to the IMPORTANT things, like playing Civ IV
I am having serious issues with the lack of city maintenance costs in my latest game, so I went reading back in this thread and saw some posts alluding to it being nerfed. Is this true? Has city maintenance basically been completely eliminated from the game now? In my last game (beta 5) my city maintenance was actually NEGATIVE and I was creating as many cities as I wanted in the early game. Is this how it is suppose to work or is there a bug or do I have a bad install?
It seems to me one should never have a negative city maintenance cost? And eliminating city maintenance in my opinion would unbalance a whole bunch of buildings (e.g., Courthouse) that affect city maintenance costs.
I haven't seen too many others complain about this so I am wondering if I have a bad install, or if somehow city maintenance has just been eliminated from the game (at least in the early game) and I'm the only one who cares. The way it is working for me now seems very broken. I hope this is a bug or a bad install, not a new feature
It seems to me one should never have a negative city maintenance cost? And eliminating city maintenance in my opinion would unbalance a whole bunch of buildings (e.g., Courthouse) that affect city maintenance costs.
I haven't seen too many others complain about this so I am wondering if I have a bad install, or if somehow city maintenance has just been eliminated from the game (at least in the early game) and I'm the only one who cares. The way it is working for me now seems very broken. I hope this is a bug or a bad install, not a new feature
Similar threads
