This is what I'm against. It's a bad name, it's long, overly descriptive and hard to remember.CPOP - the full project (Community Patch and Overhaul Project)
This is what I'm against. It's a bad name, it's long, overly descriptive and hard to remember.
We need something memorable for the whole package, not something people will have to constantly look up until they finally memorize it.
This is what I'm against. It's a bad name, it's long, overly descriptive and hard to remember.
We need something memorable for the whole package, not something people will have to constantly look up until they finally memorize it.
How is it easy to remember? And the acronym is ugly, in my opinion. I wouldn't want such an important mod to be known as "CPOP" ("see pop", urgh), honestly.I disagree. CPOP is easy to remember, and keeps us from having to wholly rebrand. CPP->CPOP is more of a clarifying 'tweak' than a full on rework.
How is it easy to remember? And the acronym is ugly, in my opinion. I wouldn't want such an important mod to be known as "CPOP" ("see pop", urgh), honestly.
Gazebo, you are probably the greatest CiV modder on the planet and a brilliant historian, but you are not very good at choosing catchy simple names. Iteroi, Wodhan, Funak and others are correct: changing the overall name of the entire project from CP to CPOP is not a good idea: it complicates an already uncatchy name; makes it more likely everyone will get mixed up between CP, CPOP, CBP, CO, and even Thal's CEP; will even confuse current players; and won't do anything to entice new players.
All your ideas for renaming the sub-branches of the overall experience are great (ie CO etc) and you should do that. But if you are going to go to the trouble of coming up with a new name for the overall combined experience, then you should pick something much catchier than 'CPOP'. Even Vox Populi is a million times better.
Gazebo, you are probably the greatest CiV modder on the planet and a brilliant historian, but you are not very good at choosing catchy simple names. Iteroi, Wodhan, Funak and others are correct: changing the overall name of the entire project from CP to CPOP is not a good idea: it complicates an already uncatchy name; makes it more likely everyone will get mixed up between CP, CPOP, CBP, CO, and even Thal's CEP; will even confuse current players; and won't do anything to entice new players.
All your ideas for renaming the sub-branches of the overall experience are great (ie CO etc) and you should do that. But if you are going to go to the trouble of coming up with a new name for the overall combined experience, then you should pick something much catchier than 'CPOP'. Even Vox Populi is a million times better.
I'm at least going to tweak the names to CPOP and CO (Community Patch and Overhaul Project and Community Overhaul). I see lots of confusion on the CP v. the CBP, and that's my fault for using the word 'patch' in the CBP to begin with. Not sexy or flashy, but at least functionally more clear than the current nomenclature.
I see no improvement from CPP to CPOP. Sure, it's more "accurate", but then again, so is "Gazebo's Improvement and Overhaul Patch That Has The Help of Some People But Mainly Most is Done by Gazebo" (GIOPTHTHSPBMMDG for short).It isn't currently 'CP,' it is CPP.
Changing the project's current acronym from CPP to CPOP doesn't preclude the generation of a fancier name, it's simply an update to confusing nomenclature from a technical standpoint. I haven't overruled a different 'fancy' name. Merely a technical rewrite for clarity. As I said below:
Anyways, to me Vox Populi sounds about as silly as Scrubwrecker, with Scrubwrecker having the added benefit of being easier to pronounce and spell. Just putting that out there.
You made me laugh this time for realI never said I dislike CPOP... I mean I do dislike it, but I never said so.
I see no improvement from CPP to CPOP. Sure, it's more "accurate", but then again, so is "Gazebo's Improvement and Overhaul Patch That Has The Help Of Some People But Mainly Most is Done by Gazebo" (GIOPTHTHOSPBMMDG for short).
Mmm, I vote for a catchy name for the full package too, and whatever you prefer for CBP. To clarify, CPOP isn't catchy for me.I think I and everyone else can say with complete certainty that we are aware that you do not see any improvement in the name. And so to for Funak et. al. with Vox Populi. Nevertheless, I see no harm in making the mod's descriptive elements more clear as a baseline for user-friendliness. If you had to field the number of 'the CP is not the CPP, but it also isn't the CBP' messages that I do, you would understand.
G
I agree that "Vox populi" in not necessarily a good name, mainly because naming a mod "Vox populi" when some of the most important member of the "populi" are opposed to it is quite ironic.
Mmm, I vote for a catchy name for the full package too, and whatever you prefer for CBP. To clarify, CPOP isn't catchy for me.
If you had to field the number of 'the CP is not the CPP, but it also isn't the CBP' messages that I do, you would understand.
G
Since when am I an important member of anything?
What absense? Most people here seemed ok with Vox Populi. Although a poll would be more enlightening (sometimes a minority can wrongly give the impression of a majority).In the absence of a 'fancier' name it will suffice as a tweak to the existing CPP in order to maximize clarity.
What absense? Most people here seemed ok with Vox Populi. Although a poll would be more enlightening (sometimes a minority can wrongly give the impression of a majority).