cubsfan6506
Got u
My favorite Reagan lie was the one when he warned that Nicaragua was only two days from Brownsville, Texas, implying that the Nicaraguan army intended to attack the United States.
Any linky's to this one.
My favorite Reagan lie was the one when he warned that Nicaragua was only two days from Brownsville, Texas, implying that the Nicaraguan army intended to attack the United States.
Please tell me you aren't seriously comparing Ronald Reagan with Hitler.
Any linky's to this one.
Usually. Reading the propaganda therein removes all doubt.Putting Ronald Reagan in the title of the thread makes it instantly neo-con BS.
Cult of personality. Except Hitler wasn't reading off a TelePrompTer, so I guess he at least deserved his.
Because things went so well under the Carter administration... right?![]()
Okay, I don't see how this invalidates my point, considering that the 1980 election was between Carter and Reagan."HAWHAW CARTER IS TEH SUCK SO REAGAN IS TEH BEST PREZ EVER DOOD. REPUBLICAN PWR!"
Okay, I don't see how this invalidates my point, considering that the 1980 election was between Carter and Reagan.
Unless you also count John Anderson, but you wouldn't... because you probably never heard of him, and probably never will.
Well, it's usually best to compare leaders in their proper historical context. Reagan wasn't President during the 40s, so it'd make no sense to compare his leadership to Harry Truman.It's just whenever a neo-con is confronted with the fact Reagan sucks, they try to piggyback on Carter suckage. Some presidents do good after sucky presidents, ala Lincoln (preceded by Buchanan) and Clinton (preceded by good ole' G.B.)
Well, before Perot, Anderson was probably the most successful third party candidate for the Presidency.And no I've not heard of John Anderson. Why should I have?
My favorite Reagan lie was the one when he warned that Nicaragua was only two days from Brownsville, Texas, implying that the Nicaraguan army intended to attack the United States.
Well, it's usually best to compare leaders in their proper historical context. Reagan wasn't President during the 40s, so it'd make no sense to compare his leadership to Harry Truman.
Well, before Perot, Anderson was probably the most successful third party candidate for the Presidency.
Okay, I don't see how this invalidates my point
Teddy Roosevelt got 27.4% of the popular vote and 16.5% of the electoral vote in 1920 as the Progressive Party candidate. Anderson got 6.7% percent of the popular vote and no electoral votes. I think Roosevelt was a tad bit more successful than AndersonWell, before Perot, Anderson was probably the most successful third party candidate for the Presidency.
Right. I should have added "in modern, post-war history."Teddy Roosevelt got 27.4% of the popular vote and 16.5% of the electoral vote in 1920 as the Progressive Party candidate. Anderson got 6.7% percent of the popular vote and no electoral votes. I think Roosevelt was a tad bit more successful than Anderson
So the Arab Oil embarago was Carter's fault now, huh?Because things went so well under the Carter administration... right?
Besides, I don't think cars idling at the gas station helped the environment any.
Well, before Perot, Anderson was probably the most successful third party candidate for the Presidency.