Anarres versus ERIKK PBEM

great game, nice read, interesting for DDPP for me too :)

And my bet is ....
I'm quite curious how it will end, I'm thinking Anarres bigger lands will give him the upper hand if Erikk doesnt act soon....

My guess would be war is coming soon. This war will determine the winner. I think it's close but for now my bet is on Erikk

@skyfish: just click on the agent orange : multyplayer conference corner link and post there
 
It is now 10AD :cool:

Here is the minimap:
130.minimap.gif


The game is pretty close, although I still think ERIKK is ahead in the long run with the Pyramids and Sun Tzu's.
 
Wow, didnt take long for you guys to get rid of most of the AI.

Of course, it would be different if it wasnt on chieftan...
 
Do I understand right that because of a bug PBEMs can only be played at Chieftain level ?:(
 
Sum up
- Sun Tzu created in Boston. (Will post later a screenie.)
- Knights and Med. Inf. prepping for final push on India.
- America is stronger on military according to the military advisor.
- In the F11 screen Greece is ahead of America in alomost everything.
- Both are in Golden Age.
- No diplomacy has been conducted yet for turns after #135. If no agreement will be settled we will enter the Cold War-age...

Current active agreement: a non-agression and non-expansion-border-pact:
130.minimap2.gif

Looking at this screen again, the Americans wonder why the Greek had so many trouble with the former Ottoman city of Izmit (upper and middle/center American city). It is clear that the former French city is too far south....

This are the near future military and expansionist plans of America:
130.minimap3.gif
 
(I just downloaded Paint Shop Pro 7 and have been playing around a bit. ;) I learn fast and will be able to make some nice battlemaps/plans in the future... :satan: )

Here is a word from our military advisor:

Troop concentrations in peacetime:
2 active divisions (1st Div and 2nd Div) and 3 regiments in reserve. (For security matters I will not spoil by telling how many units an American division or regement has.)

bat.gif


ps:
I am not into military. Can somebody tell me how divisons, batallions, corps etc.. are made up and what they should consist?
 
it depends on what country's army your asking... I think there's a difference between the Russian and US armies for example.
 
I found this in a book:

batallion: 600-1000 men
regiment: 3 bataillons
brigade: 2 regiments or more batallions (depending on command structure)
division: 3 brigades + supporting personel
corps: 2 divisions or more
army: 2 corps or more
armygroup: 2 armies or more
 
Thanx wvo :goodjob:

The words army or amrygroup I am not gonna use for obvious reasons....

let me see:
1 civ-unit can be a batallion
3 civ-units can be a regiment
6 civ-units can be a brigade
18 civ-units can be a division :eek:
32 civ-units can be a corps

I think I will form some regiments and brigades and maybe a division... ;)
 
I like the new pics for wonders in ptw. I didn't realise they had changed...
 
Very interesting stuff here, as Propain says also interesting to see how this develops for certain DDPP players. ;)

Looks like there'll be a final showdown soon, I feel ERIKK has the best position now, already being the military leader and having the Sun Tzu's in position. Those barracks could prove to be a mighty asset should war break out.
 
Game still lokks pretty balanced to me. Need more info about infrastructures.

This one may well come down to a couple of crucial dice rolls - and who strikes first and hardest.

I think its gonna get interesting soon when the world powers collide.
 
Originally posted by col
Game still lokks pretty balanced to me. Need more info about infrastructures.

This one may well come down to a couple of crucial dice rolls - and who strikes first and hardest.

I think its gonna get interesting soon when the world powers collide.
Click to expand...

Well, IIRC next turn will be 133. Our non-agression pact will end in turn 135. If we don't agree to a new one... who knows what will happen.... I expect a new diplomacy round this evening.
 
Turn 135 and the end of our treaty is approaching. We have however just managed to sign a new treaty:

anarres says:
want another treaty?
ERIKK says:
do you want another treaty?
anarres says:
yes
ERIKK says:
for how many turns?
ERIKK says:
you need to upgrade your warrioirs and horses/chariots.......
ERIKK says:
after you build Leo's
anarres says:
erikk - don't worry about what i need to do. i would suggest until turn 160
anarres says:
leo's is just 1 option
anarres says:
there are others
ERIKK says:
copernicus
anarres says:
and you don't know how many shields i have saved
anarres says:
there is also js bachs
anarres says:
and the sistine, but that is useless
ERIKK says:
you can be building 3 cities, like me: palace, FP, and another wonder (GL)
anarres says:
ahh. unless i already have an fp
anarres says:
anyway, what treaty do you want?
ERIKK says:
you might have it indeed (leader)
ERIKK says:
dont know what your Prod is....
anarres says:
hmm. i will tall you at a later date all these things
ERIKK says:
Well, i have been bussy too...
anarres says:
hehe. of course
anarres says:
so, back to the question. i have suggested alread a treaty until turn 160
ERIKK says:
Can I offer you chivalry?
anarres says:
non-agression treaty only
anarres says:
you can offer, but I don't want
anarres says:
do you want invention?
ERIKK says:
YES
anarres says:
so what do you offer?
ERIKK says:
I can offer chivalry and republic
anarres says:
money?
ERIKK says:
no money, wanna keep it
anarres says:
gpt?
ERIKK says:
no way
anarres says:
sorry, but i don't want your techs atm. researching invention would cost you money, so that's what i want. of course, i want much less than it would cost you to research...
anarres says:
i would take the techs, but i don't need them, so it would be foolish of me
ERIKK says:
saving 50 gold p/t on barracks/granaries
ERIKK says:
he he
anarres says:
so give me some
ERIKK says:
I want the non-agression, but till 175 and I want to keep the border between is as it is
ERIKK says:
is=us
anarres says:
thinking...
ERIKK says:
remember I have knights running around for nothing now while you don't
anarres says:
border rules are meaningless. i don't want them because of what happened with that french city. how about non-agression and non-tresspass
anarres says:
?
anarres says:
turn 175 is a bit longer than i wanted, but ok.
ERIKK says:
You got the city, I got mine
ERIKK says:
no rpoblemo here
ERIKK says:
I want the border
anarres says:
where?
ERIKK says:
it is to prevent mix upsi will draw it for you
ERIKK says:
as it is now
ERIKK says:
btw
ERIKK says:
izmit = the border
anarres says:
izmit is which city?
anarres says:
the french one or the ottomans one?
ERIKK says:
the middle one
anarres says:
french
ERIKK says:
which you had problems with
ERIKK says:
those two are the border
anarres says:
yeah. not the western ottomans one
anarres says:
on the east coast we shouldn't have a horizontal border because there is much unsettled land south of that invisible line
ERIKK says:
huh
anarres says:
f**k it. lets just do that. The french middle city will be my southernmost city, and all the lands my citie's borders expand to fill.
ERIKK says:
i have drawn a line in the thread before, lets keep it
ERIKK says:
like that
anarres says:
hang on then
ERIKK says:
the line is a bit misplaced
anarres says:
are you talking about post#126 from yesterday morning?
ERIKK says:
those two cities ARE the border, ok?
ERIKK says:
9:29AM
anarres says:
your central one and mine 1 square higher?
ERIKK says:
y
anarres says:
hehe. post #125
ERIKK says:
Deal?
anarres says:
so, non-agression, and non-settling, and non-tresspass in controlled lands?
anarres says:
i put it like this because i have a couple of wandering troops around
anarres says:
and it will take time to get them north of the border
ERIKK says:
seen them, it is ok
anarres says:
*not* offensive troops mind, just observers
ERIKK says:
let them observe as long as they dont pose a thread
anarres says:
ok, so as i said then. no entering someone else's land, and no settling in prohibited areas, and no attacking. All until turn 175
ERIKK says:
I have to adjust my strategies. I rather have peace than war, but I WAS prepared for war.....
ERIKK says:
deal
anarres says:
hehe. we always try to be ready
anarres says:
can i post
anarres says:
?

edited out some non-diplo chat about graphics programs to use

ERIKK says:
133 - 175 = 42 turns
ERIKK says:
ok thanx
anarres says:
hmm.
anarres says:
long time
ERIKK says:
pressed wrong enter
ERIKK says:
enables us to build up the land!
anarres says:
i am going to start my own thread with confidential info in it if i can find the time. do you think anyone will be interested?
ERIKK says:
I will wait a while with attacking the Ottomans
anarres says:
hehe. i may get that one first
ERIKK says:
what one
anarres says:
east coast
ERIKK says:
it is below the border
anarres says:
i can get promptions and destroy it. it doesn't go against the treaty.
but i don't think i can reach it before you anyway
ERIKK says:
Ah I get it, hmmm, I will have to hurry then... But I assumed you would leave it alone (not crossing the border, only for spying)
anarres says:
if you meant it to be out of bounds then you should have worded the treaty differently. it is however a non-starter because I can not reach it first.
ERIKK says:
I can block it too
anarres says:
mean what you say, and say what you mean or we may have more misunderstandings...
ERIKK says:
phew
anarres says:
hehe
ERIKK says:
That was what I meant
anarres says:
i am actually there atm with a hoplite
ERIKK says:
the east coast is mine
anarres says:
of course. for settling.
ERIKK says:
it is below the border
anarres says:
anyway, it's yours. lets post this diplo
anarres says:
and do you want invention?
ERIKK says:
You said your units were only there for reconnesaince
anarres says:
they were, but that city only just got founded
ERIKK says:
what do you want for it?
anarres says:
i wouldn't send a hoplite to kill a spear
anarres says:
money
anarres says:
it's the only thing i want
ERIKK says:
Forget it, I will research it myself
anarres says:
ok.
ERIKK says:
nice to have dealt with you
ERIKK says:
my attitude is polite now
anarres says:
hehe. see you on the battlefield
anarres says:
how do you change it?
ERIKK says:
havent figured it out. In MP you can change it yourself in the diplo screen but in PBEM you cannot
anarres says:
hmm. i will be annnoyed for the rest of the game then lol
ERIKK says:
he he, everybody hates me atm
Melifluous says:
I like you ERIKK...
anarres says:
i'm not suprised considering what you've done
Melifluous says:
Says mister nice himself
anarres says:
hehe
 
So, to summarise we have the following treaty until turn 175:

1) non-agression
2) non-tresspass (in to opponents settled land)
3) no settlements on wrong side of north-south dividing line (see post #125)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fergei
[C3C] Civ3 - Casual multiplayer club?
Replies
2
Views
229
Fergei
Fergei
bmaupin
Any Civ fans enjoyed any of the modern "mini" 4X games? (Polytopia, Ozymandias, etc)
Replies
5
Views
548
bmaupin
bmaupin
LKendter
LK174, Civ=America, CCM3, True American Democracy
7 8 9
Replies
161
Views
5K
Jersey Joe
Jersey Joe
Blake00
The Great Library Reborn - Civ3 Scenario/Mod Preservation Project Log
Replies
5
Views
1K
Blake00
Blake00
A
Playthrough on the Great - finished
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
itix
I
Back
Top Bottom