Another Fascism as a government in Conquests thread

Roundman

Prince
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
557
Location
Maryland and Virginia
I know that there was already a thread on this topic fairly recently, but I have thought of a way to implement a distinct Fascist government and I would appreciate some feedback. Here are my thoughts on how Fascism could be incorporated. I'm being brief, but I can go more in depth if people would like to discuss things further.

Fascism should have Radio, Mass Production, Communism, and Corporation as prerequisites. Radio would represent the fact that mass participation is one of the key factors that distinguises Fascism as a system. Corporatism provided an intellectual framework for Mussolini and other fascists. Communism is a pre req because of the crucial role Communism and its philosphies in the formation of fascist philosophy, along with the fact the the successful fascists used Communists as scapegoats. Finally, Mass Production represents the late industrial age time period during which fascism thrived.

How should it work:
Fascism should be a a great government for waging war, yet distinct from Communism. Fascism would not have communal corruption. Corruption wise, Fascism should be the same as republic. Fascism would be free from war weariness, and have a troop support level of 2/5/12 (which would be a growth factor off 2.5. Communism's levels are 2/4/8, which is a growth factor of 2). To further distinguish Fascism from Communism, rush builds should cost money, not population, to reflect the publicly funded public works projects of Fascist governments, such as the Autobahn. Fascist cities would be immune to foreign propaganda.

The biggest differences that I think should come with Fascism would require adjustments to some of the game rules. The role of ultra nationalism in fascist governments would have to be reflected in game terms, and would be used as a balancer. After switching to Fascism, every foreign national living in the Fascist territory should go into resistance (resistors should be modified to allow the player to starve them to death). This would make keeping foreign cities very tough, as troops would never quell the resistance short of starvation/repopulating the city woth your own ethnicity (which would reflect Nazi colonization goals). Furthermore, no foreign city would culture flip to a fascist government, no matter how superior the culture of the fascist nation. (On the other hand, if more than half of a foreign city's population was composed of the fascist's ethnic group it would have a very high chance of culture flip. This would reflect the historical actions of Austria and the Sudentenland Germans).
There would be diplomatic effects in addition to nationality effects. Diplomatically, no foreign nation could ever have an attitude better than "annoyed" with a fascist nation, no matter what the situation. A further and more dramatic handicap would do with the state of war. Fascist nations at war can never make peace with their enemies. If they make peace, then the Fascist government falls and the civ enters into anarchy.

I feel that my suggestions would create a distinct, viable fascist government. Fascist governments would be competative during peace and capable of supporting a huge war machine, but would severely handicapped in diplomatic and ethnic matters. Overall, I think that this would be an interesting addition to Civ 3, and would give us something that we couldn't create in the editor.
 
I like your idea for this government, but I have a question about your diplomacy. You say that no nation should ever have a better attitude than annoyed with a fascist state.... Correct me if I'm wrong, but Germany was, well not allied with the USSR, but on decent terms with them until Germany invaded. Also Japan was not Fascist. Alliances, or MMP, would be severely hard to obtain with anyone that wasn't fascist so this seems strange to me. Also Italy made peace with the allies. But over all a good idea.
 
Originally posted by Granite88
Also Japan was not Fascist.

some would way that japan was fascist.
 
Maybe Fascism should have the Diplomacy handicap against Democracies and Republics. The people hold the ultimate power in those two, and since fascism is aimed at them being inferior that would upset them whereas monarchies, communismt states, and despotisms are led by the will of the leader which ignores the whole extermination thing in favor of power.
 
Originally posted by tctatheel7


some would way that japan was fascist.


japan was NOT fascist, its a monarchy.
 
just curious vietcong, but are you muslim? i am not sure whether to take your signature as serious or just a joke.
 
Originally posted by jamesjkirk


Then so was Italy, and Germany was a Parliamentary Democracy, wasn't it?

italy was facist, germany was nastinol socalist or nazist.

well. im inbtween islam and cristanity. im studying it right now, but am not oficlay muslim. (yes im wight:P)
 
Islam and cristanity. They are worse of all religions.
I think so. No offence.

Choose rather shamanism, animism or satanism.
 
hmmmm
no

INFIDEL!
 
that's right Viet, take command, keep those infidels where they belong.

but we really should get off the subject of Religion, for obvious reasons.
 
lol, i know.. but im not the one who strted it.. but i will NOT talk any more of this(unless u insult my god! infidel!)
 
yes i also do not think that Fascist wars should be to the death, myb if the war goes on too long you get war weariness, after a LONG TIME, then they overthrow your fascist government and you must pick a different gov.

hey the big 100!

yay me:)
 
Originally posted by Mr. Dictator
yes i also do not think that Fascist wars should be to the death, myb if the war goes on too long you get war weariness, after a LONG TIME, then they overthrow your fascist government and you must pick a different gov.

hey the big 100!

yay me:)

true, but isnt that true with ANY gov :P
 
Japan was not Fascist, it was a monarchy, but it had a prime minister, and in the 1920's that office as well as almost every other japanese goverment office was overrun by militarists who share a large amount of views with fascism, it was mainly the desire to expand. thast is the reason why Japan joined Germany: Germany would fight the powers England, France, and Netherlands on their home ground while Japan took their Colonies in the region.
 
Originally posted by Granite88
I like your idea for this government, but I have a question about your diplomacy. You say that no nation should ever have a better attitude than annoyed with a fascist state.... Correct me if I'm wrong, but Germany was, well not allied with the USSR, but on decent terms with them until Germany invaded. Also Japan was not Fascist. Alliances, or MMP, would be severely hard to obtain with anyone that wasn't fascist so this seems strange to me.

I think that history would support a permanent state of annoyance. The Axis wasn't an incredibly friendly alliance. Mussollini basically allied Italy with Germany because he was afraid of it. Earlier, the Italian Fascists supported Austrian anti-Nazis and oppsed the Anschluss. The Soviets were always suspicious of the Nazis, even during their non-agression period. It seems to me that fascists allience aren't out of friendship, they are based on convienience. A permanent annoyed state would still allow for alliances between Fascists and others, but there would have to be very pressing issues to cause them. Also, it should be easier for Facists to ally with Monarchies, Despotisms, and Communists than with Democracies or Republics.

Also Italy made peace with the allies.

Italy's peace with the allies to me reflects a Civ 3 revolution. The Fascists were thrown from power, never able to regain total control of Italy. The later "Salo republic" was a Nazi Puppet state, not an independant country. Besides, a fight to the death clause in Fascism (where peace can only be asked for by the non-Fascist civ) helps to balance it gamewise.
 
Would you be able to change Governments THEN make peace? If so that would be extremly powerful for Religious Civs.
 
acaly, germany was going to invade austrai earlyer then whant it did, but thanks to mousalinu (spelling :P) he was afraid of having a german bourder, so he moved his forces to the austrian itlain border, and thanks to him germany didnt invade, at the time, he was calleda hero, and called a peace keepr, thanks to him, ther was no war. so the anoying thing is wrong
 
About your prerequisets for facism, communism should not be. Basically they are exact opposites. In a facist government the leader of the country owns and controls everything, while in a true communist country the people own and control everthing, everyone gets the same pay reguardless of your job type. If you ask about what a true communist country is; there is and never was a true communist country. Finally I must say that communist countries and facist countries absolutly hate each other. Facists were scared of of the communists taking over, while communist ssee fascists as an attempt of imperealism by capitalistic countries; after all Leon Trotsky did say that "Fascism is capitalism in decay."
 
Originally posted by neoruski
About your prerequisets for facism, communism should not be. Basically they are exact opposites. In a facist government the leader of the country owns and controls everything, while in a true communist country the people own and control everthing, everyone gets the same pay reguardless of your job type. If you ask about what a true communist country is; there is and never was a true communist country. Finally I must say that communist countries and facist countries absolutly hate each other. Facists were scared of of the communists taking over, while communist ssee fascists as an attempt of imperealism by capitalistic countries; after all Leon Trotsky did say that "Fascism is capitalism in decay."

Communism is a prerequisite for Fascism. The intellectual framework for Communism needs to be in place for there to be Fascism. Fascist philosophy is largely based upon the rejection of Communism and Liberalism, and the Fascist movement was fueled by the rejection of Communism by the masses. It rejecs the materialism of Communism and Liberalism in favor of an idea of natural hierarchy. Where Communism emphasizes the solidarity of the class, Fascism emphasizes the solidarity of the nation. The fascist leader doesn't own everything in the country; people still have private property, and private business is encouraged. There is large scale socialization of key industires, much like in social democracies, but nothing to the extent of Stalinist USSR. Doen't believe everything that Trotsky says; after all, he is a pretty biased observer:p
 
Back
Top Bottom