April #1 - The Great CFC-OT Avatar Switch VII

I can't take a break from Annexing, unfortunately. It's in my blood to conquer others.

/pun :mischief:

I don't even know how to be annex. Per his instructions, I'm just annexing left and right and just generally bragging about my awesomeness..

...How is that any different from my usual attitude though? :smug:

When in doubt, annex. Always good advice, you see ;)
 
He is. That thread was not cool.

I still can't help chuckling when I see Joker Churchill though.
 
this is my first avatar switch

karalysia is what i expected it to be like. and cheezy/masada. yared/zack have done well
 
Who cares what we think; it's what the mods think that matters. Let them sort it out, I feel. :dunno:

That said, it is quite epic what he's been up to... even if he has a chance of facing the wrath of the greatest weapon designed by humankind, capable of destroying man and empire alike:

Spoiler :
The banhammer!

That is the mods' decision, however.


I myself can't really participate in the fun, since I've never followed Annex's posts... but annexations and awesomeness work fine enough.

I also approve of the Masada/Cheezy and Yared/Zack pairings. This forum has gone bonkers.
 
whoa Cheezy you just blew my mind

What are you talking about? :confused: That's Masada.

:mischief:

...Very epic post however. It was quite surreal. Of course, Masada shall not comprehend why, given that he merely saying it was easier to pretend to be Cheezy than it was to be himself.

...I think I just confused myself. :crazyeye: Like, triple agent at work or something.
 
If you want to edit the OP, me and Anonymoose switched.
 
Cheezy the Wiz said:
I concede that imitating Cheezy is much easier than imitating me.

If I, Cheezy, were to try to imitate you Masada to parody I would invoke exactly how awesome Maori's are and how Maori's will inevitably succeed in their plans to dominate the world. I've accepted that Maori are my racial superiors, I think its time to push the point Masada.
After-all Everyone engaged in practical work must investigate conditions at the lower levels. Such investigation is especially necessary for those who know theory but do not know the actual conditions, for otherwise they will not be able to link theory with practice. Although my assertion, "No investigation no right to speak", has been ridiculed as "narrow empiricism", to this day I do not regret having made it; far from regretting it, I still insist that without investigation there cannot possibly be any right to speak. There are many people who "the moment they alight from the official carriage" make a hullabaloo, spout opinions, criticize this and condemn that; but, in fact, ten out of ten of them will meet with failure. For such views or criticisms, which are not based on thorough investigation, are nothing but ignorant twaddle. Countless times our Party suffered at the hands of these "imperial envoys", who rushed here, there and everywhere. Stalin rightly says "theory becomes purposeless if it is not connected with revolutionary practice". And he rightly adds that "practice gropes in the dark if its path is not illumined by revolutionary theory". Nobody should be labeled a "narrow empiricist" except the "practical man" who gropes in the dark and lacks perspective and foresight.
 
Back
Top Bottom