Xanikk999
History junkie
Is it just me, or are certain individuals getting really desperate in their crusade to blacken the name of Islam?
Islam (and most other religion) doesnt need any help with that.

Is it just me, or are certain individuals getting really desperate in their crusade to blacken the name of Islam?
It seems to me that the Meccans had cause to attack Medina, then - if Mohammad was effectively the leader of Medina, and Medina was pillaging their caravans, that is an act of war. If they had only taken back what was theirs, that would be one thing - but continuing to steal gives the Meccans quite the casus belli.
But I thought Islam was tolerant and didn't force anyone to convert, with "no compulsion in religion", and all that. If so, then why would they fear a cut off from trade routs with the pagans? If Islam would not more persecute or refuse to trade with pagans than Jews or Christians, why the worry?
Who is launching a crusade?Is it just me, or are certain individuals getting really desperate in their crusade to blacken the name of Islam?
Are you admitting that Mohammad started the Meccan-Medinan war? That's how it sounds to me, but that seems like a rather odd position for a Muslim to take. Please correct me if I'm wrong here.knigh+ said:Yes of course they did have a valid cause, nobody's claiming they attacked for no reason (most societies don't willingly wage war without reason). I am saying there was also a prior reason that created this reason.
Wars don't necessarily start with a Pearl Harbor. In this case, war started when Meccans confiscated Muslims' belongings. Mecca outnumbered Muslims by far, so Muslims fought against Mecca the only way they knew could hurt them - anology: think of Muslims as the German navy of WW2, and Mecca as the British Royal Navy.
And I just checked wiki for this. It says the first raid did not even succeed, the second raid did succeed, and the third raid force was ambushed by Meccans at Badr - resulting in the battle. So it's not like they have been raiding many caravans over the years. They just raided one after their stuff was confiscated. Then Mecca declared war. And if there is war, what's the point of not raiding the next caravan?
Sure, but not enough to go to war over. And I'd be even more ticked when they started stealing my camels.Well, if you are running the holy pilgrimage site of idolaters, and some people one caravan stop prior to your city are preaching that your idols are a fluke, wouldn't you get pissed off?
And do you have evidence that is the case? It is an easy claim to make, but harder to verify.
I was asking you - is there evidence that the raids were attempting to retake their own property?
I don't know of anything worth citing, I just remember it from 6th grade history classes and Anthony Quinn's movie.
I saw that 'the message' starring anthony quinn as abu hamza. ace film. 1st stop for anyone non-muslim who wants to know about islam. highly recommended viewing.
Just a warning to every one here on this topic, Salah Addine is not muslim's spoksman, he does not represents the vast majority of the muslims. He said it himself, he is a fundamuntalist and his views are those of a fundamuntalist. He very often talk about the 90% Sunni he is part of as opposed to the 10% Shia, but he is more part of the x% Fundamuntalists. The vast majority of the Sunni consider Shia to be muslim like them, Shia make the pilgrimage to Mecca and Iran is part of the Islamic Coference. Salah Addine call them Kaffir, a very rare opinion among Sunni. The vast majority of Muslims do not consider music to be haram, Salah Addine do.
To consider him a "typical" Muslim would be like considering a Jehovah Witness a typical Christian, he is not. He is a typical Fundamuntalist Muslim.
I'm reading a book where two Omani people greet each other like this:
Person1: Salam Alaikum.
Person2: Alaikum as Salam.
Is this the norm or is it bad research by the writer?
I'm not sure, bit I think it should be "Wa Alaikum as Salam".
But you do agree that when he says something, he is following the Islamic canon?
It doesn't matter - as long as he is being asked, he can answer. We don't seem to have a "typical" Muslim here - I don't know knigh+'s credentials - but Salah and incantrix, atypical as they may be, at least are answering.
It doesn't matter - as long as he is being asked, he can answer. We don't seem to have a "typical" Muslim here - I don't know knigh+'s credentials - but Salah and incantrix, atypical as they may be, at least are answering.
We don't have any "typical" Mormons either - I, downtown, and even stegyre are somewhat more liberal politically or theologically that most Mormons - but as long as we are answering the questions, those are the answers you will get.
I mean, what form of Islam do you follow, how strictly do you follow it, what is your ethnic/religious/national background, all that.