iRule
Warlord
Where did you get that they're naming Brazil's leader Bolivar??
Where did you get that they're naming Brazil's leader Bolivar??
who's saying the ARC is dystopian, or if there even are such concepts as the US, Mexico and Canada anymore.
For all we know what we know as Mexico is the site of millions of proxy conflicts between ARC and Mexico.
Anyone else hoping for more than just these factions?
...
I don't think they'd be that plain. I give them more credit than that.More and more I think they planned Brasilia to be the current Venezuela, but in the future ...
Why should it not include Russia?
Anyone else hoping for more than just these factions? I mean [...]
Anyways give me your opinion!!
I feel Slav Federation is very underwhelming name for any union Russia as we know it is in. Russia have almost double land compared to Europe (or triple if excluded Russian Europe) I prefer the federation build around Russia, not Russia being part of any regional group.
Exactly! Who knows what might have happened in the world by the year 2250.
Maybe it's possible for Brazil to have a Spanish-named leader (they could have it one right now and it wouldn't be a problem). My main concern is that Firaxis chose a family name too attached to an important historical figure.
As Lord Shadow pointed out, Brazil has been populated by several waves of immigration, so a local leader could have an italian or japanese surname and remain totally credible.
Well, think about it. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics had no mention of Russia in its name, yet in reality that was by far the dominant party. It could very well be the same case with the Slavic Federation.I feel Slav Federation is very underwhelming name for any union Russia as we know it is in. Russia have almost double land compared to Europe (or triple if excluded Russian Europe) I prefer the federation build around Russia, not Russia being part of any regional group.
As Lord Shadow pointed out, Brazil has been populated by several waves of immigration, so a local leader could have an italian or japanese surname and remain totally credible.
Well, think about it. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics had no mention of Russia in its name, yet in reality that was by far the dominant party. It could very well be the same case with the Slavic Federation.
And let's not forget official titles are in no small part meant to give an external image. The Federation might give an outward impression, no matter how thin, that things aren't all that lopsided within the polity. And inward as well to some extent: for non-Russians, perhaps at least a superficial assurance that they're well-represented among their federated peers.
[...] If they just wanted a faction led by a Libertador type of leader, I dont see why theyd pick Brazil instead of one (or a group of) its neighbors. Does it have anything to do with the Bolivarian Revolution? Do they know that most Brazilians probably dont have a clue on who Bolívar was?
Yeah, that's a map of the Soviet Union, but the point remains even in modern Russia.Wow, quite an outdated map. I mean, the Baltic States, Ukraine, Belarus,... they still show as Russian territory?