SolInvictus
Warlord
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2013
- Messages
- 183
Well I'm happy to see Morocco and Indonesia in the game and I'm ready to concede that Hungary will not be in but I'm more than disappointed and upset about it, more on that later. First...
Venice is not really a bad choice but Hungary should have gotten the first choice.
Morocco is a good choice, but whether or not its contributions exceed that of Hungary's depend on whether or not you include al-Andalus in the definition.
I'm against it only because this was a zero sum game and the remaining European slot should have gone to Hungary. I'll elaborate on that more at some point in a thread where it will be on topic and post a link here. I don't want to sidetrack this thread.
Venice is a God awful choice as a civ. If it had to be Euro, you may as well have gone with Hungary or some Eastern Euro nation.
Venice is not really a bad choice but Hungary should have gotten the first choice.
Morocco's contribution is much more than Serbia in world history, and at least as good as Hungary if not more.
Morocco is a good choice, but whether or not its contributions exceed that of Hungary's depend on whether or not you include al-Andalus in the definition.
The Venetian Republic was a major power economically, politically, and militarily. Why are people against it?
I'm against it only because this was a zero sum game and the remaining European slot should have gone to Hungary. I'll elaborate on that more at some point in a thread where it will be on topic and post a link here. I don't want to sidetrack this thread.