If "Khan" you meant me, then let me offer you my opinion (I think I already posted a personality for him, but there's so many I can't keep track). Thankfully I've been reading on Genghis Khan since I was 8, so this is a good thing.
To keep it very brief, I'd say Ogodai Khan, or at least the environment around his reign, was more like his father's than his newphew's. Firstly, there was still some serious expansion and conquest going on, not just in one place, but all over the place - China, India, the Middle East, Russia and Central Europe. Think of it as if the Mongols were really warmed up at this point and launching even more serious attacks. In fact, had not Ogodai died of alcoholism, the Mongols would have pushed all the way into Europe and we wouldn't be here today. Which brings me to my next point.
Ogodai's biggest problem was alcohol. Legend has it that Ogodai's younger brother, Tolui, attempted to help him by forcing him to drink a limited amount of cups of wine. Ogodai simply drunk from bigger cups.
Anyhow, despite this flaw which may have saved millions of lives, Ogodai was chosen by his father as successor as he was intelligent and well-organized. He also was not prone to anger like some of the other sons.
His reign also saw some of the results of Mongol conquest turn up - all that surprising economic prosperity and rather progressive policies (i.e. religious toleration, better environment for trade), and all of that.
If I had to sum up the guy in one sentence, I'd say he was a conqueror like his father - perhaps an underrated one at that, but, due to the fact that he came after his father, he also began to oversee the solidification and establishment of the Mongol Empire as a semi-civilized (if that makes any sense) one.
I may note that right after his death the Empire began to split up, that by Kublai's time, Kublai's grip on the other Mongols was rather weak.
Hope that helps.
As for traits, I would say Imperialistic and Organized would be better.
