Burger King vs. McDonalds

Where would you prefer to dine?

  • Burger King

    Votes: 66 45.5%
  • McDonalds

    Votes: 44 30.3%
  • Frankly, they're both repulsive!

    Votes: 35 24.1%

  • Total voters
    145
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
3,058
Location
Land of the Proud Beaver
Which place is preferable to eat in in matters of quality, price, hygiene, quantity, service and taste?
Poll is on its way!
BTW, I voted for Burger King. IMO, it's better than McDonalds in nearly all the factors I listed up.
 
McDonald's, no question.

This might be the rare thread that doesn't split by right versus left. As shown by me and Patroklos agreeing.
 
All descriptions being relative to the two, McDonalds. Burger King has better fries, but McDonald's has better everything else.
 
I disagree. In the UK BK has weird chips, and the chips are the best thing on the McD menu (except for the chocolate milkshake). I prefer BK burgers though, and the Burger King looks like Charlemagne so bonus points there.
 
I disagree. In the UK BK has weird chips, and the chips are the best thing on the McD menu (except for the chocolate milkshake). I prefer BK burgers though, and the Burger King looks like Charlemagne so bonus points there.

Agreed Burger King chips are terrible and Mcdonalds is closer
 
Ah, I did forget to compare the advertising. McDonald's still wins overall in my estimation, but BK does win the mascot race.

I shun both universally for Hardie's if I am intent on fast food burgers.
 
I shun both universally for Hardie's if I am intent on fast food burgers.
Well, its an old topic on this forum, and I'm not sure if you have this option where you live, but In N' Out beats all.

I don't think we have Hardies in CA. I lived in TX for a year and had What-a-burger... disappointing.
 
In N' Out? That's what happens when people who think up names haven't read A Clockwork Orange :lol:
 
We don't have In N' Out here. You do have Hardies there, but it is called Carl's Jr on the west coast.

Hardies is only my pick if going the fast food route, which is maybe once every three months. If I want a good burger, I go to Five Guys.
 
in-n-out-sign.jpg
 
Burger King, mainly because the meat tastes like meat.
 
If I had to choose between the two BK since they have better burgers, and I don't eat fries at McD's since they coat them with a 1/4" thick layer of salt. But I voted option three since they both suck compared to A&W.
 
Doesn't sound very appetite-stimulating. More like a manufactuary where hungry people get stuffed as fast and cheap as possible.

Maybe In 'N' Out Burger doesn't sound too appetizing, but it's very high quality for being fast food. If they were where I live, then I'd go there at least once a week. Their burgers and milkshakes are awesome.
 
I like burger king breakfast a lot better. The Croissant is much better than the Egg McMuffin.

I like McDondals fries better than Burgerkings, but I usually get Oinion Rings.

I like McDonalds burgers better too.

I will say then breakfast goes to burgerking and lunch/dinner goes to McDonalds.
 
Lick's (small regional chain in Ontario) > A&W > McDonalds.
 
Back
Top Bottom