Because all morals descend from the evangelical God and all other people are either deluded for not realising this or completely immoral for rejecting this.
If something is morally wrong because God says so and becomes morally right because god says so (pork, shellfish...), than there is no objective morality.
If something is morally wrong because God says so and becomes morally right because god says so (pork, shellfish...), than there is no objective morality.
I was attempting to suggest that such a position is neither rational nor reasonable, not pass a judgement on whether such a moral code would be objective or not.
"Try again" can only be legitimately used when the other person arguing has severe flaws in the argument that need to be corrected before their conclusions can be evaluated. The fail-to-convince version is just trolling.
Does complaining about the quality of OT in 20XX compared to 20XX-n count?
Edit: this entire thread, I missed the "IRL" component. Even still, I've complained about the quality of this place compared to other years to friends who've never been here.
"Try again" can only be legitimately used when the other person arguing has severe flaws in the argument that need to be corrected before their conclusions can be evaluated. The fail-to-convince version is just trolling.
"Ivory tower" must have been one for OT for a while, 'cos I used for a CFC-based drawing long ago. I don't recall seeing it being used in years though, so it must have been a very brief while.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.