from the presence of those branches in his cities. Is that not how it works anymore?I haven't used them much in C2C, but my understanding of them from Vanilla was that if you had the HQ in your city, but placed the Corporations themselves in your opponents cities, he could get the Food / Hammer bonus, but the HQ in your city would get
geared city with all the bonuses, high trade, Stock Markets, Wallstreet, and any other NW or WW you can get to boost in there... that would rake in a lot of extra But if the headquarters from them still make a monetary profit from each you have, and you have them all over your empire, and the HQ is located in your
Or am I missing something?
/ city with that corporation, basically just like the vanilla religious shrines. Unfortunately the increased maintenance costs from having the corporation in just one of your cities is usually enough to wipe out any profit you might get from spreading your corp to other cities, not to mention the actual gold cost of building and using executives.
Here's what I was thinking:
Prehistoric Era:
-1& +1
-1/ person
Ancient Era:
-2
-1
Classical Era
-3
-2
Medieval Era:
-4
-3
Too many icons, continued in next post.
to all buildings that apply. If there is still to much excess gold then I will start making different builds cost more than -1. This seems like the safest method to finding balance.
I think I am going to first start out with a standard -1
buildings affected when using Civics that change whether they are state or privately owned?
So how are -
for the power plants, water, law enforcement, fire, and education. And with those in mid game I balance at 85% science. I still have the garbage, health and transportation buildings to implement too. I wonder if just a -1 will be enough to balance things out. neutral, so their real advantage is to allow nearby farming).
. So if you build crime buildings but forgo justice ones, avoid / buildings until necessary, etc. and still can only keep your head above water at 100% , then a player with a more well-rounded strategy would need to keep 10-20% . my late-medieval game at 10% slider went from +1000 to +500. With the next update and all the fire/law buildings it went down to +0, and with this low - change it's back to +800. , Medieval / Renaisance / Industrial buildings cost -2, Modern -> Future Era buildings cost -3. I think any higher - and the AI will avoid that building like the plague, I cant see it building a -10 / turn sewer even if it's a prereq for the good housing.
Don't forget that not everyone builds every building, not every city needs every building. For example, Town Wells only get built in cities with no fresh water (and sometimes not even then since they are
though. How much maintenance do they really require? Equal to the entire profit of a Deer Herd? Water Towers and Treatment for sure though.
From my experience:
When you did just the water buildings at high -
Is this with the new changes of -1
multiplier building, not getting one can be a real disadvantage. I think it might be a good idea to make them a little more accessible, maybe adding copper (or even stone / obsidian to represent semi-precious stones like lapis lazuli or turquoise) to the list of things that let you build them?
Jewelries are the first real
+25% trade routes from a jewelry are a pretty big bonus, if players who can build them by the ancient age are rolling in money and players who can't are suffering with 70% , maybe they should be easier to get. Jewelry can be made using bronze, copper, pewter, ivory, etc. Maybe you don't get the +2% from having a precious metal, but losing out on the other benefits seems kind of harsh.
