Prince_Imrahil
King
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2006
- Messages
- 820
skadistic said:The fool is the man who sits and whines in a nation to selfish to risk its treasures and people to free a nation on the other side of the world from an insane mudreous despotic tyrant who filled mass graves with hundreds of thousands of people, a man who had prisons for children of political prisoners, a man whos sons raped little girls for fun and killed for sport, a man who tortured, a man who gased his own citizens. A fool indeed to cry foul about a nation on the side of freedom to sooth his eggo but forgets the evils that no longer run unabashed.
The war was won in an astoundind display of military power. The aftermath could have been avoided or lessened if only the selfish nations who would rather point and complain instead of helping had the balls to back up their holy then thee high horse rhetoric. But actions are hard and talk is cheap.
RedWolf said:This craptastic post is exactly why I wish your nation, it's politicians and it's military only the worst in Iraq. I'm not sure why you're so angry at me - you wanted this war - you got it. Deal with it - we're better off without it.
By the way - you're welcome for the help we've delivered in Afghanistan (and the Canadian lives we've thrown away). I don't support that one either - but it's irrelevant since people like you don't appreciate it anyways.
I agree with skadistic on the point that we're there trying to do the right thing (yes we have our stakes in the matter, but you can't argue that we did not get rid of a loathsome system) and I also appreciate the canucks over in Afghanistan doing the same.... the thing is, though, are you really better off without us being in Iraq and Afghanistan?
But also, if we're not doing this for our own benefit, is there any reason we should be over there fighting these wars? In the name of what's right and good for humanity perhaps, but if it didn't affect us, why should we care? Do we care only because it affects us?