If we remove them then we are forcing the game to utilize the trade units feature that I'm seriously considering scrapping from the code entirely since it is causing delays and terrible trade deal evaluations.
Well Vicinity tag wasn't used for dogs - those two buildings, which I restored their vicinity requirements were only buildings using vicinity tag on non-map resources.
Only read half the sentence did you? You will get free subdued animals from all improved plots with the resource on. Those animals can build the herd in a one of your cities. You need to put the improvement and connect anyway to get the resource. forts count.
If you remove the central breeders, you're cutting off the ability to use the central breeders to account for trades you have with other nations for horses, elephants and camels to be able to allow you to get somewhere with a vicinity source from it.
The central breeders do nothing with trade. They don't provide any resource. Trade is in the resources you do have and they don't need top be in the vicinity. You have always been able to trade them.
Central Breeders are OR requirement for Animal Trainer buildings, and those allows you to train Tamed Horse/Camel/Elephant.
Raxo explains how it works but if you trade for a horse and you don't have any in a vicinity access, without the Central Breeder - Horse, you won't get any benefit from trading for the horse resource because on its own you can do nothing with it.
You can't set just one unit to be mergable against the normal rules for its combat class and there are no tags for being able to unlock a change in those settings for a unit or a unitcombat based on a tech reached.
no offense but the way i explained it above is the way it "used" to work for years .. . . infact right after u put in "uncut" is when it started working THAT way . . .right up to about 6 months or more ago . . .
My recent changes were a fix to someone making cats and canines capable of merging and splitting. I don't know who overrode the settings I had on those but none of them were able to merge or split before I took a break and came back to those unitcombats having lost the xml that bans them from doing so. If you had only been merging those more advanced cats, it didn't mean you weren't able to merge earlier ones. Prior to that, I had established that neither canines nor felines could merge or split under any conditions and if one type was able to then it could have been missing a combat class which would've been a bug for other reasons.
Sometimes features delay possibility to improve resource.
That's really in the DLL and it's already a bit crowded on the tooltip, particularly with the intricacy of the coding of that particular display output. I might look at adding it eventually.
Oh I guess @strategyonly forgot to uncheck BUG option named "Hide unavailable worker actions"
Don't know, python just displays what the dll tells it to display there, not sure if I can change much about it with simple python modding.
Yes, so long as the tags employed in the promotions are those that will transfer through. Most of them do. If you'd like me to check on any specific tags, let me know.
Just a small 5% boost to attack or defense or both.
