- Joined
- May 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,884
Sorry for letting you wait a little bit, but I had problems with my hard drive and now I have a new anti virus program and my internet connection is not as stable as I want it (even for this reply I had 10 breakdowns). I didn´t want to start a quiz.
Ozy is right. It is a new entry for the possibility to withdraw from a combat, but "withdraw" or "retreat" doesn´t sound positive enough for me, so I used a term of some wargames for an attack, that both sides can stand. In CCM the possibility to survive such an attack is massively enlarged, what is very positive not only for the new setting of the landarty, but for gameplay in general.
I want to do the civilopedia in the style El Justo created it for TCW: short and informative. So for the new units in CCM at present there is only one page.
But I wonder somewhat, that the best improvement in the units page of the civilopedia in my eyes wasn´t noticed. A hint: Look at the info about the resources.
BTW.: There is no harm on the CCM files, as I have an "up-to-date" back up of CCM and additionally it is installed on my laptop.
Ozy is right. It is a new entry for the possibility to withdraw from a combat, but "withdraw" or "retreat" doesn´t sound positive enough for me, so I used a term of some wargames for an attack, that both sides can stand. In CCM the possibility to survive such an attack is massively enlarged, what is very positive not only for the new setting of the landarty, but for gameplay in general.
I want to do the civilopedia in the style El Justo created it for TCW: short and informative. So for the new units in CCM at present there is only one page.
But I wonder somewhat, that the best improvement in the units page of the civilopedia in my eyes wasn´t noticed. A hint: Look at the info about the resources.
BTW.: There is no harm on the CCM files, as I have an "up-to-date" back up of CCM and additionally it is installed on my laptop.