Christianity and Islam: ANY similarities?

How similar are Christianity and Islam?


  • Total voters
    174
@ Katheryn: The possibility of a new crusade is not at issue here. With regard to your claim of manufacturing similarity, I do not believe that we are doing that. Rather, your ilk are going out of their way to portray Islam as completely and utterly opposed to the values and beliefs of Christianity. You have repeatedly said that Islam's beliefs are offensive to Christians. I fail to see how that attitude is conducive to us "getting along".

@Aneeshm: I would say that they have been at loggerheads for political reasons. When Islam expanded in the seventh century, it conquered vast territories that happened to be Christian. The previous owners of those territories naturally fought back, but it had little to do with religion. China and India have not fought because, as you say, the Himalayas are in the way. The greatest mountain range in the world is a powerful deterent to aggression.
 
Perfectionist said:
@ Katheryn: The possibility of a new crusade is not at issue here. With regard to your claim of manufacturing similarity, I do not believe that we are doing that. Rather, your ilk are going out of their way to portray Islam as completely and utterly opposed to the values and beliefs of Christianity. You have repeatedly said that Islam's beliefs are offensive to Christians. I fail to see how that attitude is conducive to us "getting along".

Well, I think you were the one talking about killing, weren't you?

You said this:

If I believe that you must be killed, we are unlikely to be the best of friends.

And what evidence do you mean? When you said this:

We simply believe that it has similarities. A better question is why people like yourself insist that it has no similarities, in the face of all evidence...

Because I haven't seen any evidence.
 
Rather, your ilk are going out of their way to portray Islam as completely and utterly opposed to the values and beliefs of Christianity. You have repeatedly said that Islam's beliefs are offensive to Christians. I fail to see how that attitude is conducive to us "getting along".

My ilk? As in how dare I research what Muslims actually say and believe? How dare I take it out from the dark of secrecy and bring it out, and let the light shine upon it?

How dare I tell people about this odd thing they do... 5 times a day deny that Jesus Christ is God the Son...

The funny thing is that I just learned that since we started this thread.

How dare I research such a thing?

I was wondering if our "prayers" were similar.

Hmmm... nope.

And that makes me an "ilk" of some sort?
 
Katheryn said:
Well, I think you were the one talking about killing, weren't you?
I was pointing out that a certain degree of similarity is essential in order to live together.

My ilk? As in how dare I research what Muslims actually say and believe? How dare I take it out from the dark of secrecy and bring it out, and let the light shine upon it?

How dare I tell people about this odd thing they do... 5 times a day deny that Jesus Christ is God the Son...

The funny thing is that I just learned that since we started this thread.

How dare I research such a thing?

I was wondering if our "prayers" were similar.

Hmmm... nope.

And that makes me an "ilk" of some sort?
You accused me of manufacturing similarities. I responded by saying that you and your kind are manufacturing differences.The fact that they deny Jesus' divinity does not mean that there are no similarities. I have already explained that point. If you think otherwise, you are forced to say that all the various Christian denominations have no similarities, due to the minor theological differences between them. As to this:
And what evidence do you mean? When you said this:

Quote:
We simply believe that it has similarities. A better question is why people like yourself insist that it has no similarities, in the face of all evidence...



Because I haven't seen any evidence.
Ah, let's see, where to begin. They are both monotheistic, they both believe in prophets, they both aggressively proselytize, they both have hierarchical structures, they both believe in a saviour who will bring about a perfect society, they both prohibit the worship of images, they both have holy books that they believe to be the word of God, they both believe in an afterlife, they are both squeamish towards sex, they both believe homosexuality is a sin, they both believe in sin etc. These beliefs are often in stark contrast to the beliefs held by Eastern religions. I am not saying that they are identical, but I am saying that they have much in common and are far more closely linked to each other, and to Judaism, than to most other religions.

My basic point is that the details of the theology don't matter. They both grew out of the same tradition and evolved along similar lines. It is like two different schizophrenics. One may believe that he is the Messiah and one may believe that demons are telling him to kill people. However, the illness is the same, regardless of the specifics of the symptoms.

Slightly off topic, I wonder if you could clear something up for me. If Jesus is God, how can his death possibly redeem humanity? It would seem that a human sacrifice would be necesary for that. Moreover, if God wants to redeem us, why go through the rigamarole of crucifixion? Why not just do it with a thought?
 
You accused me of manufacturing similarities. I responded by saying that you and your kind are manufacturing differences.The fact that they deny Jesus' divinity does not mean that there are no similarities.

I have said many more differences than Jesus' divinity. But I will go over it again since you didn't get it the first time.

I have already explained that point. If you think otherwise, you are forced to say that all the various Christian denominations have no similarities, due to the minor theological differences between them. As to this:

They are not theological differences. I have explained this numerous times. Christianity is a simple message.

This is it:
Acts 16:

The jailer called for lights and ran to the dungeon and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. Then he brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”

They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, along with everyone in your household.”

Now if a community wants to add create standards of behavior for themselves, they can do so. But it is not 'THE GOSPEL'.

Quote:
And what evidence do you mean? When you said this:

Quote:
We simply believe that it has similarities. A better question is why people like yourself insist that it has no similarities, in the face of all evidence...



Because I haven't seen any evidence.

Ah, let's see, where to begin. They are both monotheistic, they both believe in prophets, they both have hierarchical structures, they both believe in a saviour who will bring about a perfect society, they both prohibit the worship of images, they both have holy books that they believe to be the word of God, they both believe in an afterlife, they are both squeamish towards sex, they both believe homosexuality is a sin, they both believe in sin etc. These beliefs are often in stark contrast to the beliefs held by Eastern religions. I am not saying that they are identical, but I am saying that they have much in common and are far more closely linked to each other, and to Judaism, than to most other religions.

I'm all ears, but I see no "evidence". I have given you "evidence" in that when I say, "Christianity believes this.." or "Jesus said that", I give you the exact words right from the Bible. This is "evidence" of what Christians believe. Where is yours? I see you claiming things, but no 'evidence'.

You say that a 'similarity' is Monotheism. I say that it is the concept of WHO IS GOD? that is the question. What is "monotheism"? The Islamic people claim that if you believe in the Trinity, you are NOT monotheistic, you are a polytheist. If you do not deny that JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD, then you are a polytheist. So, the question becomes, who has the authority to define 'monotheism'? You? Your school? My church? A mosque? A mufti? Who? Maybe your definition is ALL WRONG. How about a more relevant question: What are the attributes of God?

Prophets, you say, but WHO ARE THESE PROPHETS? What prophets? Mohammed? No, I don't think we share prophets! Jesus? No, Jesus was NOT a prophet! Don't share that one either. Moses? Our stories of what happened with Moses are entirely different. They say he went to Arabia and gave the Ten Commandment to Muslims there. My Bible says that Moses gave them to the Israelites. They are entirely different stories. These are not talking about the same people.

Hierarchial Structures? No. Most Christians do not have one, if you mean a Church with a more important guy above him and a more important guy above him, and so on. All I have is a Pastor. He has no one above him. One pastor and a few elders. Again, there is no ultimate way to structure a church, they are all different. Some have denominations, some do not. They are all different.

They both do NOT believe in a Savior. Muslims deny the possibility that ANYONE can save ANYONE. They vehemently deny this. They say that a man will be judged solely by his deeds and no other can bear the burden of his sins. So, no, there IS NO SAVIOR IN ISLAM.

Prohibiting the worship of Images... Christians do NOT have this rule. Sorry. We are DEAD TO THE LAW. We are in the New Testament. We do not have these kinds of rules, this is one of the Ten Commandments and they do not have any authority over a Christian. Honestly, I have gone to church for 20years and have never heard a sermon on not worshipping idols. EVER.

Our holy books couldn't be any different. ALL religions have holy books. I was looking at a 'religious studies' curriculum online a while ago and they said that when they compare religions, they compare these things:

1) Practical and ritual
2) Emotional (conversion)
3) narrative/mystical writings
4) Doctrinal/Philosophical
5) Ethical and legal
6) Social and institutional

So, I think you are confusing the fact that ALL religions have certain aspects. That doesn't mean that the religions are SIMILAR. It means that ALL religions have these things, namely what is listed above. So, that doesn't make Islam and Christianity SIMILAR, it just categorizes them as RELIGIONS.

Afterlife, yes, I suppose ANY religion believes in an afterlife, but what IS that afterlife? Do we screw? Do we get many screw partners? Is it endless sensual pleasure? I mean really. We have no real concept of what heaven is going to be as Christians except that there will be no tears. And, Jesus did tell us that there is no sexuality in the afterlife, as in no marital type relations. We have been given sex now, and it is used greatly as a metaphor for our relationship with Christ, as in He is the Bridegroom and the Church is the Bride... as in Song of Solomon, a highly sexual book of the Bible. The Israelites are often compared with being Jehovah's unfaithful wife.. etc. So, we generally believe that 'heaven' will be the fulfillment of the "shadow of things to come" and sex is our shadow. So, some type of bliss, comparable to a human orgasm is to be expected, and if the current orgasm would be the shadow, the real thing must be much better.

Which brings us to sexual squeamishness. I think I just dispelled that. I'm not squeamish. My husband isn't squeamish. Why do you think I am? You should go look at my picture in the member's thread. I'm not ugly. I get chased around the house daily. I already said that I don't give a rat's ass what anyone does in their bed.

My basic point is that the details of the theology don't matter. They both grew out of the same tradition and evolved along similar lines. It is like two different schizophrenics. One may believe that he is the Messiah and one may believe that demons are telling him to kill people. However, the illness is the same, regardless of the specifics of the symptoms.

Well, if you go to college and go to a Comparative Religon class, they won't agree. The "details" are what differentiates religions from one another. You take categories that all religions have then you COMPARE those, and see how similar they are from one another.

And so we get down to what you really think, which is you really do want to say.. "Put all the religious nuts into the corner... we will deal with them later!"

This is not the study of religion, my friend. It is simply taking a section of people (who believe in God) religious people, and tossing them out because you don't like what they say.
 
Slightly off topic, I wonder if you could clear something up for me. If Jesus is God, how can his death possibly redeem humanity? It would seem that a human sacrifice would be necesary for that. Moreover, if God wants to redeem us, why go through the rigamarole of crucifixion? Why not just do it with a thought?

You have asked a couple of questions so I will separate them.

1) How can the death of a person of the Godhead redeem humanity?

Well, there is a short answer and a long answer, really. The short answer is this: Because we are fallen. because of this, we are unable to pick ourselves up and move on. The long answer really leads us into more questions, like... why did God even create man if He knew it would be such a heartache? Why give him free will? Why create an enemy that will tempt? Is there such a thing as tough love? Love with discipline? Unconditional love and acceptance? If God is all knowing, how can he let his people fail?

Now I know that the story of Adam and Eve in the garden seems trite, but let's assume we are talking on mulitple levels here, literal, metaphoric, allegory, poetic, mythological, and symbolic. Let's just go with story and see the philosophical questions that it leads us into.

Man was given choices, whether he would be satisfied with communion with God, ie , 'walking with God in the garden' or accepting the fruit of the serpent that would give him 'extreme' knowledge. That knowledge ended up being knowledge to destroy, to kill, and it unleashed untold evil upon the world, but if it could make you 'like a god', like Jehovah, it might be worth it. Maybe God is ripping you off, and there is more. So man decided to ally with the enemy against God. Hence, sin entered the world, and in a way, the world was then given over to the enemy, and as a result, we are under his rule. Because of this, man is now unable to have communion with God any longer. So, man is in a bad predicament that he can't fix. He has joined the other side. How does he get back? If we need reconciliation, how will it happen?
Isaiah 59

1 Behold, Yahweh's hand is not shortened, that it can't save; neither his ear heavy, that it can't hear:

but your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you, so that he will not hear.

The way of peace they don't know; and there is no justice in their goings: they have made them crooked paths; whoever goes therein does not know peace.

Therefore is justice far from us, neither does righteousness overtake us: we look for light, but, behold, darkness; for brightness, but we walk in obscurity.

...We grope for the wall like the blind; yes, we grope as those who have no eyes: we stumble at noonday as in the twilight; among those who are lusty we are as dead men.

...We roar all like bears, and moan sore like doves: we look for justice, but there is none; for salvation, but it is far off from us.

For our transgressions are multiplied before you, and our sins testify against us; for our transgressions are with us, and as for our iniquities, we know them:

...transgressing and denying Yahweh, and turning away from following our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.

16...He saw that there was no man, and was appalled that there was no intercessor: therefore his own arm brought salvation to him; and his righteousness, it upheld him.

...He put on righteousness as a breastplate, and a helmet of salvation on his head; and he put on garments of vengeance for clothing, and was clad with zeal as a mantle.

... "A Redeemer will come to Zion, and to those who turn from disobedience in Jacob," says Yahweh.

..."As for me, this is my covenant with them," says Yahweh. "My Spirit who is on you, and my words which I have put in your mouth, shall not depart out of your mouth, nor out of the mouth of your seed, nor out of the mouth of your seed's seed," says Yahweh, "from henceforth and forever."

http://bibleresources.bible.com/pass...&versio n1=31

So, as you see in verse 16, God is appalled that there was no one on Earth that could intervene, so He did it himself. I have actually edited it quite a bit (where the.... is) so you can read the whole thing at the link. But pretty much, that is the answer. Man is incapable of doing what needs to be done, so God came Himself, in the person of Jesus Christ.



------------------

2) Moreover, if God wants to redeem us, why go through the rigamarole of crucifixion? Why not just do it with a thought?

You know, that is a really good question, and I know the answer, but it is really difficult to explain. It is really complicated. It's like a 1000 piece jigsaw puzzle that is a mess until you start putting all the pieces together, then they start to make a picture, little sections at a time.

Perhaps this will shed some light on why we think it possible that God had a Son. It is a prediction (prophecy) from the Old Testament:

Jeremiah 31:

31 Behold, the days come, says Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

32 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they broke, although I was a husband to them, says Yahweh.

33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says Yahweh: I will put my law in their inward parts, and in their heart will I write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people:

34 and they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know Yahweh; for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says Yahweh: for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin will I remember no more.

Man is incapable of doing what needs to be done, so God came Himself, in the person of Jesus Christ.


2)Why go through all the rigamarole?

You know, that is a really good question, and I know the answer, but it is really difficult to explain. The short answer? Because we were tricked once before, God wants to be sure that we know when it is Him. We don't listen so good!

These concepts are complicated. It's like a 1000 piece jigsaw puzzle that is a mess until you start putting all the pieces together, then they start to make a picture, little sections at a time.

There appears to be a standard way that God deals with man. Who knows, maybe there are many worlds and he has the same rules everywhere.

What we do know is that He doesn't change the rules. One rule is that he chooses to speak to His people through prophets. And, he chooses to use predictions to show that it is God who is giving the words to that prophet. So in other words, he says "to prove that it is really Me, and not anyone else, I will give predictions and they will come true." Most of the Bible is predictions of things to happen in the future. Things like the Babylonian captivity, the coming of Jesus Christ, the next coming of Jesus Christ, most of Ezekiel, Isaiah, Daniel, Zechariah, are all prophecies. The coming to pass of these things is what proves it is really God telling people what to do and not a trick of our enemy.

Much of the Old Testament has 'shadows' 'archetypes' 'prototypes' of the answer to Adam's rebellion. The Passover ceremony has very strange rituals that the family must perform during the dinner. I have a video from Jews for Jesus that goes into detail about the Passover, showing all the 'breaking of the bread' and the sacrifice of the lamb and all kinds of other details that all point to the death of Christ on the cross. If you google it, I'm sure you can find the materials. It is fascinating.

All these things that happened, ie the Sabbath rest, the promised land, on and on, the Old Covenant - all point to the FINAL FIX. What would happen when the next ADAM came to fix what the first Adam screwed up? It is all there in the wierd Jewish law. And, not only that, but there is also many times when a prophet says that it is so, that these laws are shadows.

I think this is because at one time, man had been tricked by the enemy, saying "Did God say...?" "Well, he's trying to rip you off!" and "You will be as a God, having this important knowledge".

So we need to have a foolproof way of knowing that this is REALLY GOD TALKING, and we are not being tricked by our old terrible enemy.



For instance, we were given 300 prophecies so that we would recognize who this man was that was coming to do the big FINAL FIX. It would have been very difficult to ignore who He was. That is a lot of rigamorole, but we were tricked once, and maybe God is saying, 'never again'.

Like this:
This is what the LORD says—
your Redeemer, who formed you in the womb:
I am the LORD,
who has made all things,
who alone stretched out the heavens,
who spread out the earth by myself,

25 who foils the signs of false prophets
and makes fools of diviners,
who overthrows the learning of the wise
and turns it into nonsense,

26 who carries out the words of his servants
and fulfills the predictions of his messengers,
who says of Jerusalem, 'It shall be inhabited,'
of the towns of Judah, 'They shall be built,'
and of their ruins, 'I will restore them,'

"This is what the LORD says—
Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty:
I am the first and I am the last;
apart from me there is no God.

Who then is like me? Let him proclaim it.
Let him declare and lay out before me
what has happened since I established my ancient people,
and what is yet to come—
yes, let him foretell what will come.

Do not tremble, do not be afraid.
Did I not proclaim this and foretell it long ago?
You are my witnesses. Is there any God besides me?
No, there is no other Rock; I know not one."

And maybe we also learn about who God is, what He is like, how we can please Him when we read and understand His ways.

I hope that answers your questions. I did that even after you called me a schizophrenic!
 
I hope that answers your questions. I did that even after you called me a schizophrenic!
I did not call you a schizophrenic. I suggested a certain similarity between religion and mental illness.

They are not theological differences. I have explained this numerous times. Christianity is a simple message.

This is it:
Quote:
Acts 16:

The jailer called for lights and ran to the dungeon and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. Then he brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”

They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, along with everyone in your household.”



Now if a community wants to add create standards of behavior for themselves, they can do so. But it is not 'THE GOSPEL'.
Then why are there so many Christian sects? Half of christianity denies that Jesus can be a source of divinity. That seems like a significant difference to me. Moreover, if it such a simple message, why do you need the bible or pastors or even an organization?

You say that a 'similarity' is Monotheism. I say that it is the concept of WHO IS GOD? that is the question. What is "monotheism"? The Islamic people claim that if you believe in the Trinity, you are NOT monotheistic, you are a polytheist. If you do not deny that JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD, then you are a polytheist. So, the question becomes, who has the authority to define 'monotheism'? You? Your school? My church? A mosque? A mufti? Who? Maybe your definition is ALL WRONG. How about a more relevant question: What are the attributes of God?
Just the question I want to ask. If you look at that, you will see that Allah and YHWH are far closer to each other, than to Brahman or Odin. One of the prime attributes of Thor, for example, was killing giants with a hammer. As to the definition of monotheism, it is easy "Believing that there is only one god". It's right there in the word, after all.

Prophets, you say, but WHO ARE THESE PROPHETS? What prophets? Mohammed? No, I don't think we share prophets! Jesus? No, Jesus was NOT a prophet! Don't share that one either. Moses? Our stories of what happened with Moses are entirely different. They say he went to Arabia and gave the Ten Commandment to Muslims there. My Bible says that Moses gave them to the Israelites. They are entirely different stories. These are not talking about the same people.
The fact that the story of Moses appears in both religions is far more significant than the fact that those stories differ. After all, the stories about Jesus in the bible differ. And Moses does not appear at all in the overwhelming majority of religions. The same with Jesus.

Hierarchial Structures? No. Most Christians do not have one, if you mean a Church with a more important guy above him and a more important guy above him, and so on. All I have is a Pastor. He has no one above him. One pastor and a few elders. Again, there is no ultimate way to structure a church, they are all different. Some have denominations, some do not. They are all different.
I hate to break it to you, but most Christians, now and throughout history, are Catholic. You will agree that Catholicism has a hierarchy.

They both do NOT believe in a Savior. Muslims deny the possibility that ANYONE can save ANYONE. They vehemently deny this. They say that a man will be judged solely by his deeds and no other can bear the burden of his sins. So, no, there IS NO SAVIOR IN ISLAM.
Are you familiar with the Mahdi?

Prohibiting the worship of Images... Christians do NOT have this rule. Sorry. We are DEAD TO THE LAW. We are in the New Testament. We do not have these kinds of rules, this is one of the Ten Commandments and they do not have any authority over a Christian. Honestly, I have gone to church for 20years and have never heard a sermon on not worshipping idols. EVER.
Then why is it in the bible? You have said before that the bible is what christians believe. The prohibition against images is in the bible.

Our holy books couldn't be any different. ALL religions have holy books.
Have you ever read the Vedas or Norse mythology? I assure you, the books could be much more different

Afterlife, yes, I suppose ANY religion believes in an afterlife, but what IS that afterlife? Do we screw? Do we get many screw partners? Is it endless sensual pleasure? I mean really. We have no real concept of what heaven is going to be as Christians except that there will be no tears. And, Jesus did tell us that there is no sexuality in the afterlife, as in no marital type relations. We have been given sex now, and it is used greatly as a metaphor for our relationship with Christ, as in He is the Bridegroom and the Church is the Bride... as in Song of Solomon, a highly sexual book of the Bible. The Israelites are often compared with being Jehovah's unfaithful wife.. etc. So, we generally believe that 'heaven' will be the fulfillment of the "shadow of things to come" and sex is our shadow. So, some type of bliss, comparable to a human orgasm is to be expected, and if the current orgasm would be the shadow, the real thing must be much better.
Most religions do not have an afterlife in the same way as Christianity and Islam. In Hinduism, for exampe, heaven is considered to be temporary, and most pagan religions pictured the afterlife as a dim place, quite unlike both heaven and hell.

Which brings us to sexual squeamishness. I think I just dispelled that. I'm not squeamish. My husband isn't squeamish. Why do you think I am? You should go look at my picture in the member's thread. I'm not ugly. I get chased around the house daily. I already said that I don't give a rat's ass what anyone does in their bed.
If that is true, then you are decidedly in the minority. Throughout history, christians have taken an inordinate amount of interest in what people do in bed. We are discussing the whole religion, not your personal views, remember?

Well, if you go to college and go to a Comparative Religon class, they won't agree. The "details" are what differentiates religions from one another. You take categories that all religions have then you COMPARE those, and see how similar they are from one another.
You should try that sometime. You will see that Islam and Christianity are far closer to each other, and to Judaism, than to any other major religion. Have you ever really considered Hinduism? It is radically different from any western religion. One last comment: Comparative religion lumps Islam together with Christianity and Judaism as Abrahamic religions, so I don't think you want to take refuge there.

And so we get down to what you really think, which is you really do want to say.. "Put all the religious nuts into the corner... we will deal with them later!"
Actually, the smart thing to do is divide the nuts against each other. Then, they will wipe each other out without us having to do anything. And what you really want to say is "There is no God but God and Jesus. Kill the infidel".

This is not the study of religion, my friend. It is simply taking a section of people (who believe in God) religious people, and tossing them out because you don't like what they say.
I fail to see how. I am simply suggesting that Islam and Christianity are similar. I am not tossing out anyone. And it is not that I dislike what they say. What they say is verifiably false.
 
They are not theological differences. I have explained this numerous times. Christianity is a simple message.

This is it:
Quote:
Acts 16:

The jailer called for lights and ran to the dungeon and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. Then he brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”

They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, along with everyone in your household.”



Now if a community wants to add create standards of behavior for themselves, they can do so. But it is not 'THE GOSPEL'.

Then why are there so many Christian sects? Half of christianity denies that Jesus can be a source of divinity. That seems like a significant difference to me. Moreover, if it such a simple message, why do you need the bible or pastors or even an organization?

NO THEY DON'T! 99% of the Christians in the entire world believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ. I showed that from wikipedia. Why do you think 'half of Christianity denies that Jesus can be a source of divinity'? That is totally wrong! I already posted the list of which denominations agree to the Nicene Creed. That encompasses 99% of the Christian Churches in the world! You are just making stuff up!


Quote:
You say that a 'similarity' is Monotheism. I say that it is the concept of WHO IS GOD? that is the question. What is "monotheism"? The Islamic people claim that if you believe in the Trinity, you are NOT monotheistic, you are a polytheist. If you do not deny that JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD, then you are a polytheist. So, the question becomes, who has the authority to define 'monotheism'? You? Your school? My church? A mosque? A mufti? Who? Maybe your definition is ALL WRONG. How about a more relevant question: What are the attributes of God?

Just the question I want to ask. If you look at that, you will see that Allah and YHWH are far closer to each other, than to Brahman or Odin. One of the prime attributes of Thor, for example, was killing giants with a hammer. As to the definition of monotheism, it is easy "Believing that there is only one god". It's right there in the word, after all.

Huh? This is a fallacy. You are saying that Islam and Christianity are alike because other religions are less alike. That doesn't make sense! That is a logical fallacy! That is saying: A is not B therefore C is A. MATH, BABY! It don't compute. It ain't valid! Jane doesn't look like Sue. Therefore Sue looks like Betty.

Quote:
Prophets, you say, but WHO ARE THESE PROPHETS? What prophets? Mohammed? No, I don't think we share prophets! Jesus? No, Jesus was NOT a prophet! Don't share that one either. Moses? Our stories of what happened with Moses are entirely different. They say he went to Arabia and gave the Ten Commandment to Muslims there. My Bible says that Moses gave them to the Israelites. They are entirely different stories. These are not talking about the same people.

The fact that the story of Moses appears in both religions is far more significant than the fact that those stories differ. After all, the stories about Jesus in the bible differ. And Moses does not appear at all in the overwhelming majority of religions. The same with Jesus.

Because they STOLE a story means they are alike? Okay, then if I steal something from you then it creates a connection between us? Again, where it some common sense? It is simple PLAGARISM. It is unethical, it is illegal.

Stories about Jesus in the Bible DO NOT DIFFER? What drugs are you on? If they did, don't you think someone would have noticed and fixed it? Do you think we are MORONS? Oh yeah, that's right - YOU DO!

Hierarchial Structures? No. Most Christians do not have one, if you mean a Church with a more important guy above him and a more important guy above him, and so on. All I have is a Pastor. He has no one above him. One pastor and a few elders. Again, there is no ultimate way to structure a church, they are all different. Some have denominations, some do not. They are all different.


I hate to break it to you, but most Christians, now and throughout history, are Catholic. You will agree that Catholicism has a hierarchy.

The Catholic Church can do whatever they want! There are no rules for it in the Bible. In the early church it was very egalitarian, with several different types of workers. The Catholic Church is a voluntary institution. Still, Islam NEVER modelled it's institutions after the ones in the Catholic Church. They have no Fathers, no Bishops, no Pope. The structure is completely different.

The structures of the religions are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Islam is a legal, political entity. It has a civil code, Sharia law, that is enforcable by the civil authorities. By the POLICE. Christianity has no rules WHATSOEVER that are enforced by the civil government.

They both do NOT believe in a Savior. Muslims deny the possibility that ANYONE can save ANYONE. They vehemently deny this. They say that a man will be judged solely by his deeds and no other can bear the burden of his sins. So, no, there IS NO SAVIOR IN ISLAM.

Are you familiar with the Mahdi?

And you think the Mahdi is a Savior? What kind of Savior? It is a political leader that is going to enforce Sharia all over the world. It doesn't 'save' anyone. It only saves Muslims from people like YOU - atheists.

It doesn't save people from SIN. Their Mahdi will be an enforcer. He will demand that ALL men and women in all the world become Muslims.

A Savior saves one from something. This one "Saves" from NOTHING.

[/QUOTE]

Quote:
Prohibiting the worship of Images... Christians do NOT have this rule. Sorry. We are DEAD TO THE LAW. We are in the New Testament. We do not have these kinds of rules, this is one of the Ten Commandments and they do not have any authority over a Christian. Honestly, I have gone to church for 20years and have never heard a sermon on not worshipping idols. EVER.

Then why is it in the bible? You have said before that the bible is what christians believe. The prohibition against images is in the bible.

[/QUOTE]

Again, we have already answered this. The prohibition is from the TEN COMMANDMENTS, these are the rules for the JEWS. Not the Christians. It is the Old Covenant. Christians are a part of the New Covenant. Do we live in Israel? Do we worship at the Western Wall? Do we celebrate Passover? Do we keep the Sabbath? Are we Jews? NO! Then we do not follow these rules!

Our holy books couldn't be any different. ALL religions have holy books.

Have you ever read the Vedas or Norse mythology? I assure you, the books could be much more different

Same logical fallacy. Because C(Norse)is not like B(Christianity) - then A(Islam) is like B(Christianity).

It doesn't compute.

Quote:
Afterlife, yes, I suppose ANY religion believes in an afterlife, but what IS that afterlife? Do we screw? Do we get many screw partners? Is it endless sensual pleasure? I mean really. We have no real concept of what heaven is going to be as Christians except that there will be no tears. And, Jesus did tell us that there is no sexuality in the afterlife, as in no marital type relations. We have been given sex now, and it is used greatly as a metaphor for our relationship with Christ, as in He is the Bridegroom and the Church is the Bride... as in Song of Solomon, a highly sexual book of the Bible. The Israelites are often compared with being Jehovah's unfaithful wife.. etc. So, we generally believe that 'heaven' will be the fulfillment of the "shadow of things to come" and sex is our shadow. So, some type of bliss, comparable to a human orgasm is to be expected, and if the current orgasm would be the shadow, the real thing must be much better.

Most religions do not have an afterlife in the same way as Christianity and Islam. In Hinduism, for exampe, heaven is considered to be temporary, and most pagan religions pictured the afterlife as a dim place, quite unlike both heaven and hell.

OH please! They have Nirvana, which is a blissful type of afterlife. And reincarnation to something AWFUL might be the same as hell. We don't know WHAT hell is like. We speculate, that is ALL.

Quote:
Which brings us to sexual squeamishness. I think I just dispelled that. I'm not squeamish. My husband isn't squeamish. Why do you think I am? You should go look at my picture in the member's thread. I'm not ugly. I get chased around the house daily. I already said that I don't give a rat's ass what anyone does in their bed.

If that is true, then you are decidedly in the minority. Throughout history, christians have taken an inordinate amount of interest in what people do in bed. We are discussing the whole religion, not your personal views, remember?

No, I am not in the minority. I know lots of Christians and they are not squeamish. WE don't care what people do in bed, I wonder why all the minority sexual preference groups want to stick it in our faces! They do so, all the time.

Quote:
Well, if you go to college and go to a Comparative Religon class, they won't agree. The "details" are what differentiates religions from one another. You take categories that all religions have then you COMPARE those, and see how similar they are from one another.

You should try that sometime. You will see that Islam and Christianity are far closer to each other, and to Judaism, than to any other major religion. Have you ever really considered Hinduism? It is radically different from any western religion. One last comment: Comparative religion lumps Islam together with Christianity and Judaism as Abrahamic religions, so I don't think you want to take refuge there.

I am showing you by that model that you are not using the proper format for comparing religions. If you did so, you would be able to look at the core beliefs, the rituals, in the social community, the conversion experience, the philosophy, the ethics, the texts of their holy books (what they are SAYING - truly SAYING- not superficially) look at these things and you will see that in NONE of these things are they similar.

You'd have to be totally brain dead to believe Islam. It is the most ridiculous set of beliefs, completely plagarized from other religions, full of violence, slavery, misogyny, killing, stealing and plundering. You'd have to believe that God gave Mohammed permission to ravage a good 25% of the world, stealing people's property, forcing them into captivity, raping whatever women took their fancy, and killing the rest! It takes old Hindu beliefs and twists them into worshipping a huge ROCK full of idols that they KISS, and they do many ceremonial rituals plagarized by both Judaism and Hinduism as well! You'd have to believe that it is OK to marry a 6 year old, bed her at 9. And, you'd have to think that it is a perfectly perfect example of a godly man to force your own son to divorce his wife so that you could have her yourself! You'd have to believe that a woman is at fault 90% of the time in cases of rape or adultery! And the list goes on.

Islam has NOTHING in common with Christianity. Any resemblence of similarity is ONLY because they have copied Judaism, and the parts they have copied are NOT incorporated into Christianity. How many times must I say this? Do you see Muslims taking communion? None! Baptism? None. There are no other rituals in Christianity.

Quote:
And so we get down to what you really think, which is you really do want to say.. "Put all the religious nuts into the corner... we will deal with them later!"

Actually, the smart thing to do is divide the nuts against each other. Then, they will wipe each other out without us having to do anything. And what you really want to say is "There is no God but God and Jesus. Kill the infidel".

Well, you will be disappointed there, because Christians aren't interested in 'wiping' anyone out. And who is "us"? You mean when "The Mahdi" comes? He will be coming for atheists first, my friend, that is what they say! Godless people are much worse than Christians. Christians will have a 'chance' at least. Atheists are in big trouble.

Aren't you in England? Well, if so, here is one of your top guys. He will be DEFENDING YOU.

It took three miracles to make me listen to Christ, says Army chief
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones
Last Updated: 1:39am GMT 30/10/2006

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...9/warmy229.xml

As a young soldier, Gen Sir Richard Dannatt inspired his men with his outstanding bravery and won the Military Cross for risking his life to save his comrades.

The new Chief of the General Staff believes, however, that he owes his survival in a series of near-death experiences to divine protection.

In a frank account of his conversion to evangelical Christianity, he describes how he came to realise that God had allowed him to cheat death while others around him perished, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.


He believes that three times God preserved him when he was within seconds of losing his life, to challenge him to devote his life to Christ.

The claims come only weeks after he made an explosive intervention on the continued presence of British troops in Iraq and expressed concern at the decline of Christian values in Britain.

"When I see the Islamist threat I hope it doesn't make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country," he said. "The Judaic-Christian tradition has underpinned British society. It underpins the British Army."

Although he was strongly supported by the Army for warning that forces were being over-stretched, some observers have suggested that his beliefs were behind his decision to speak out. Such zealously religious comments from the head of the Army are likely to cause concern in some quarters.

In Candles in the Darkness, a compilation of testimonies from Christians serving in the Army and RAF, Gen Dannatt reveals how his first escape came in 1973 when he was in Belfast leading a platoon trying to deal with a crowd of rioters. Sent into an area controlled by Loyalist paramilitaries, he was stranded with his driver and corporal.

Gen Dannatt, 55, has never talked about how he earned the MC trying to save the life of his driver, Pte Raymond Hall, but in the book he remembers the distress of losing one of his men.

"I was briefing one of my section commanders," he writes. "My driver was down beside my vehicle as sentry. A hail of bullets leaped down the street. The corporal and my driver fell on either side of me. My driver later died. I walked away unharmed."

He says that he came to see this as the beginning of a series of "challenges from God" to commit not just a part of his life "but all of it".

While clearing mines in south Armagh in 1975, he was seconds from death. Walking forward slowly with his company commander, Major Peter Willis, he stopped to study an aerial photograph while Major Willis took a few more steps.

"Half a minute later and 30 yards away 70lb of commercial explosive detonated. My friend was killed instantly. I walked away unharmed."

A few months later, in Germany, he fell asleep while driving his car: "I drove off the autobahn at 70 mph straight into a field. At the point where I went off the road the field and road were absolutely level and flat, 200 yards further on there was a 20ft bank and a wood. I walked away unharmed."

He continues: "On three occasions God had shown me His love and His protection and had challenged me to make a complete commitment to Him, but on each occasion, I had failed to make the response that He wanted from me. Finally, I had to be stopped so that the lesson could be learned … God had no choice but to take a stick and beat me over the head."

He says that God spoke to him while he was recovering from a "mini-stroke" that he suffered as a 26-year-old in 1977. Together with his wife, Philippa, he now praises "God for His mysterious and loving ways".

Sir Richard, who is vice president of the Officers' Christian Union, became the head of the Army earlier this year, but nearly left a few years ago to become a Church of England priest.

jSo, I wouldn't be too nasty while the Christians are still the ones defending the homeland.


This is not the study of religion, my friend. It is simply taking a section of people (who believe in God) religious people, and tossing them out because you don't like what they say.

I fail to see how. I am simply suggesting that Islam and Christianity are similar. I am not tossing out anyone. And it is not that I dislike what they say. What they say is verifiably false.

Well that is odd, you are contradicting yourself. A second ago, you said that you are going to send Christians to the lions, throw us in with the Muslims and let them kills us. That we were all the same, religious schizophrenic nuts.
 
Katheryn said:
NO THEY DON'T! 99% of the Christians in the entire world believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ. I showed that from wikipedia. Why do you think 'half of Christianity denies that Jesus can be a source of divinity'? That is totally wrong! I already posted the list of which denominations agree to the Nicene Creed. That encompasses 99% of the Christian Churches in the world! You are just making stuff up!
So you admit that the 1% who disgree are still Christian. Cool!
 
Perfection said:
So you admit that the 1% who disgree are still Christian. Cool!


I'll tell you what I told my nephew a few weeks ago. He was *****ing about something he learned at his liberal college, UC Santa Cruz. And I said, "Look, kid - you're my godson. I wanna know this: Do you believe Jesus died for your sins or not?" and of course he said, "Oh yeah, sure" And I said, "OK, then, you'll do, don't sweat it! Shutup about everything else."

Edit: Oops, I didn't know that was a bad word! Sorry!
 
Katheryn said:
Why do people WANT Islam to be similar to Christianity?

I mean, I don't get it, really I don't.
You are quite fond of absolutes aren't you? Even saying they have a ton of simularities is not the same as saying they are identical or simular.

Too be honest I don't give a rats arse what's in that Bible. The way I percieve either religion shows a ton of simularities. You have answered there are NONE. That's another absolute. You can't really believe there is not a single simularity no matter how insifnificant can you?

How about 3 point I pointed out earlier:
- Both tell, no insist they are right and the rest of the world is wrong
You're a nice little example of that right here :)

- Both of them have members who don't agree amongst themselves because of differences in interpretation, no matter what the interpretation is however, all of them claim the first point.
Look around you. I know christians who believe in hell, I know christians who don't. I know muslims who call other muslims non-muslims. And those muslims call he ones I know non-muslims. it's like two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong ...... or both. :)

- Both of them have really beautifull religious buildings which I can use as tourist attractions.
St. Paul's Cathedral is amazing, but so is the Hagia Sophia :)

edit:
Katheryn said:
I'll tell you what I told my nephew a few weeks ago. He was *****ing about something he learned at his liberal college, UC Santa Cruz. And I said, "Look, kid - you're my godson. I wanna know this: Do you believe Jesus died for your sins or not?" and of course he said, "Oh yeah, sure" And I said, "OK, then, you'll do, don't sweat it! Shutup about everything else."
Poor kid, why not let him find out for himself what he's going to believe :(

edit 2: Why are you so defensive when your religion is being compared with Islam?
edit 3: Nevermind, I just read the quote is C`G's post (the next one). *shakes head*
 
Katheryn said:
Huh? This is a fallacy. You are saying that Islam and Christianity are alike because other religions are less alike. That doesn't make sense! That is a logical fallacy! That is saying: A is not B therefore C is A. MATH, BABY! It don't compute. It ain't valid! Jane doesn't look like Sue. Therefore Sue looks like Betty.
That fallacy depends in what level we are trying to categorize by comparing them.

It is as much of fallacy in general to say that since Jane has huge mole in her face and since everyone who knows Janes know her based into her mole so she cannot be ever compared to Sue since Sue doesn't have a huge mole in her face. So even if Jane and Sue would be identical twins the difference is that huge mole which makes Jane totally different from Sue. No similarities of course.

Logic, baby!

Katheryn said:
You'd have to be totally brain dead to believe Islam. It is the most ridiculous set of beliefs, completely plagarized from other religions, full of violence, slavery, misogyny, killing, stealing and plundering. You'd have to believe that God gave Mohammed permission to ravage a good 25% of the world, stealing people's property, forcing them into captivity, raping whatever women took their fancy, and killing the rest! It takes old Hindu beliefs and twists them into worshipping a huge ROCK full of idols that they KISS, and they do many ceremonial rituals plagarized by both Judaism and Hinduism as well! You'd have to believe that it is OK to marry a 6 year old, bed her at 9. And, you'd have to think that it is a perfectly perfect example of a godly man to force your own son to divorce his wife so that you could have her yourself! You'd have to believe that a woman is at fault 90% of the time in cases of rape or adultery! And the list goes on.
I rest my case.
 
Mott1 said:
If Katheryn is what you people define as a Christian 'radical', then I would rather live in a city of radical Christians than amongst a community of moderate Muslims.

Sure, as long as:
1. You are not gay
2. Your girlfriend (or you) does not need an abortion
3. Your girlfriend (or you) don't wear a hijab
4. You are not a "savage" immigrant form the ME

:lol: :lol:
 
Katheryn said:
It takes old Hindu beliefs and twists them into worshipping a huge ROCK full of idols that they KISS, and they do many ceremonial rituals plagarized by both Judaism and Hinduism as well!

They believe that Kaba is built(yeah, built, it is a building) by Abraham, and like it is said in this thread, our god is Abraham's god etc.

I have heard that those idols what you mentioned are in Islam coz there were many polytheistic religions near Arabia, and it was easier to Muhammed to convert people to Islam with idols.

I think that Christianity and Islam have many common things, they have some same prophets, have same God. Those two are damn important things in religion.
 
Back
Top Bottom