Trav'ling Canuck
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
- Messages
- 3,417
So since it is technically ivory even though it is represented by elephants it could still be in the tundra since you can get ivory from walrus tusks.
Woods walruses, to be exact.
So since it is technically ivory even though it is represented by elephants it could still be in the tundra since you can get ivory from walrus tusks.
Siberian mammoth ivory was a major source of ivory in the 18th century, and mammoth ivory is still a source of ivory. If it's near the coast, walrus ivory is another possibility.Not sure if this has been posted before, maybe this is intended? Seems strange to have ivory on tundra. Are there any real cases of this? Maybe they are accounting for wooly mammoth? I don't know much about elephants, but I can't think of any that live in tundra.
Only Glorantha's walktopus can compare to it.One has not truly lived until one sees the majestic arboreal walrus gracefully scurrying amongst groves of pines.
Actually, overheating is a problem for elephants in their natural habitats; they have to manage their body temperature carefully, hence mud baths, etc. The bigger issue for them would be too little food.Seemed kind of funny. I would think elephants would get too cold since they would have bare skin exposed to the elements and a lot of surface area.
The bigger issue for them would be too little food.
I think it happens in the unmodded game, as Ivory can spawn in Woods, including Woods on Tundra.
Doesn't fuss me. Mammoths would have been a great source of Ivory and their demise happened during the Age of Man. Not a big stretch to roll a world where members of the elephant family remain alive in northern climes.
But while narwhal "horns" are teeth...they're not made of ivory. They were a major luxury good, though, and the Scandinavians made a killing off them. Literally. I suppose they're already covered by whales in boreal waters, but they'd make an interesting (albeit controversial) luxury resource...Don't forget about narwhals!
Their horn was the inspiration of the unicorn.
But while narwhal "horns" are teeth...they're not made of ivory. They were a major luxury good, though, and the Scandinavians made a killing off them. Literally. I suppose they're already covered by whales in boreal waters, but they'd make an interesting (albeit controversial) luxury resource...
(Also, their horns weren't the inspiration for unicorns, but they were sold to alchemists as unicorn horns.)
Can you believe Wilhelmina had the chicanery to whine to me about Kalhu? LOOK AT MAASTRICHT!
View attachment 505640
But things got weirder. Peter conquered Amsterdam and Utricht but lost them to loyalty pressure...only for Wilhelmina to lose Maastricht and Rotterdam to loyalty pressure. So now I have a perfectly stable empire of free cities on my northern border.![]()
I'm not good at conquest, but if I can get my nerve up I can at least take Maastricht and get my revenge. If I take the rest...Wilhelmina can have them back. Well...Utricht is pretty nice, too. But she can have Amsterdam and Rotterdam back if I take them.
View attachment 505641
Update: I've now taken Maastricht (which is now Dur-Shurrukum), and once my troops heal I'll move on to Utrecht (the future Tarshhan). Then I'll take Amsterdam, give it back to Wilhelmina, and Rotterdam is her problem.![]()
Yes. I liberated Amsterdam. Rotterdam flipped to me, but I rejected it. It was on its way to flipping to Wilhelmina when Peter reminded us all that he's still a massive jerk, declared war on the Netherlands, conquered Amsterdam, and then waited for Rotterdam to flip to him.Then Rotterdam will probably flip to you.