Civilizations you would like to see in DLC

[MistroPain]

1 - Goths (real game changers in their region and not previously presented if I remember correctly, could be wrong).
2 - Khmer, or a Siam/Burma civ.
3 - Korea.
4 - An Italian City State, ideally Florence or Venice.
5 - Ethiopia or the Kushites.

 

[Beuyse13]

I'd love to see Mali again in Civ 6! And with the new possibility of having extra leaders, they seem specially great, as they are one of the few sub-saharian African civs that have a couple very interesting choices. I'd personally pick Musa I and Sundiata Keita myself, they are the most iconic and they offer some interesting gameplay possibilities, Musa would have a gold-related ability, while Sundiata a general-based one, perhaps? As for the civ ability, I think science bonuses are too broken, and a 50% boost is even more unbalanced at that! You gotta think of something else.

I guess the idea is overpowered just a idea at that but Souleyman would be interesting, someone else other than Mansa

 

[Beuyse13]

Persia: more representative than just Achaemenid Persia this time around
Hittites: this is probably better in an expansion pack, unless they bundle it with some thing else, but I'd still like to see them. Anyway, give them a stronger chariot unit. If the normal chariot is ranged again, definitely make their unique one melee.
Inca and Iroquois: actually, I'd rather see them in an expansion, but I want to see them either way.

Maybe the Safavids would be good? Id like to see them some interesting developments during that time period

 

[Beuyse13]

Byzantine Empire, under Nikephoros Phocas, Basil II, or Konon the Isaurian.

Id also LOVE to see tje Etruscans under Lars Porsenna with faith generating swordsmen. (The Etruscans were a heavily religious people, and it seems they were the origional innovators pf gladiator games, which had a religious significance)

Maybe they coould be religiously biased with some domination in there

 

[Beuyse13]

Italy - Culture/ warmonger focus, possibly covering both united and renaissance Italy.

The Goths - land Norway, pillaging/ city razing focus (they did sack Rome after all).

The Ottomans - Give me the sweet Janissaries, expansionist civ.

Argentina - We need more South American Nations

Sweden - Gustavus Adolfus done right this time, bonus for forming corps and armies earlier than others.


Algiers - led by Oruç Reis/Barbarossa, a pirate themed civ, probably overlaps with Norway in a way but still it would be interesting to have a civ representing the Berber states and their riding/pirating of the Mediterranean coast.[/QUOTE

Goths would be cool but Id rather see the Ostrogoths or Vandals
Ottomans - gib me lots o sipahis
Argentine, Id replace it with Colombia like Gran Colombia, would be cool tho
Sweden THAT GINGER BEARD!

 

[Beuyse13]

I came up with a new idea for the mali bonus more like a 10% boost maybe 20%, but I think they need to add the .................................................



MAJAHAPIT (BTW thanks Gamer Zakh for the idea check him out)
Leader - My Moobies bae Gajah Mada
UU - Majahpit seamen - a unit that replaces the swordsman can cross coast tiles straight away and can settle cities
UD - Candi - replaces religious district but produces more religion points if built next to a coastal tile
UA - Island peoples - Cities grow faster if built next to the sea and produce more science, culture and gold
LA - Palapa Oath - Cities with luxury resources have increased production and culture outputs

 

[otaman1]

Ottoman and Persia are most definitely going to be DLC civs

 

[SoyBentioJuarez]

Vietnam, Mexico, Armenia, the Comanche, and Hungary. Let's get more new guys in the game, please and thank you.

 

[God of Kings]

I came up with a new idea for the mali bonus more like a 10% boost maybe 20%, but I think they need to add the .................................................



MAJAHAPIT (BTW thanks Gamer Zakh for the idea check him out)
Leader - My Moobies bae Gajah Mada
UU - Majahpit seamen - a unit that replaces the swordsman can cross coast tiles straight away and can settle cities
UD - Candi - replaces religious district but produces more religion points if built next to a coastal tile
UA - Island peoples - Cities grow faster if built next to the sea and produce more science, culture and gold
LA - Palapa Oath - Cities with luxury resources have increased production and culture outputs

That civ might just be called "Indonesia" like in BNW.

 

[Mobfire]

Civs I'd like to see as soon as possible
- Maya
- Mongolia
- Ottomans
- Inca
- Persia
- Khmer

Civs that I'd like to see but only later:
- Haida
- Netherlands
- Korea
- Sioux
- Mali
- Mississippians (middle Mississippians like Cahokia in particular)
- Portugal

 

[Uberfrog]

Mali - Musa I - gold, spending it on faith units
Ottomans - Mehmed II - conquest, sieges and faith
Inca - Huayna Capac - mountains, building infrastructure and roads
Iroquois - Hiawatha - city-state suzerainty, diplomatic allegiances
Khmer - Jayavarman VII - construction, amenities and wonders

 

[LimulusNautilusLatimeria]

- Persia -Classical
- Ottomans - Reniassance
- Mongols -Middle age
- Inca - Ancient
- Siam - Industial

 

[daft]

Byzantium should be added as an Imperialistic, Seafaring, Cultural and at the same time deeply religious/spiritual civilization. I'd say Justinian should be the leader, or perhaps Constantine, or the above metnioned Basil. This empire lasted for a thousand years, the first Christian empire of history. Byzantium's cultural addition to the history of Earth's civilization cannot be denied, unless you haven't read much about Byzantium's history that is.

Besides that: Persia, how Persia isn't included in CVI vanilla is beyond me.
How did Brazil beat out the Inca for the right to represent South America is another mystery.

 

[Zaarin]

Iroquois - Hiawatha - city-state suzerainty, diplomatic allegiances

I'd rather see a new Native American civ, but if we do get the Iroquois again I hope we get a historical leader like Joseph Brant/Thayendanegea (who, incidentally, definitely fits the bill for leaders with big personalities). True, he was a leader of the Mohawk, not the League, but the League was governed by a council that ruled by consensus, which would make selecting a League-wide leader difficult to say the least.

 

[daft]

1. Tlingit (or any Native American civ other than the Sioux or Civ4's "Native Americans")
2. Maya
3. Korea
4. Babylon
5. Phoenicia or Carthage

Tlingit, really? Maybe Marsians?

Any other native American besides Sioux? And I imagine besides the most oft used Iroquois?
Ok, how about: Cherokee, Navajo, Haida, Huron, Mississipian(Cahokia), Powhatan, Apache, Inuit, Comanche, Anasazi (not Pueblo!!!!)?

Almost no one has ever heard of Tlingit!, just type in Haida the next time, a name far more known to common folk.

My suggestions for the sake of history(mainly):
Africa:
Mali, Ethiopia, Morocco and Zulu (or South Africa led by Mandela)
Europe:
Sweden, Poland, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Scotland, Byzantium, Italy, Etruscans, Minoans.
Asia:
Korea, Tatars, Khazaria, Siam, Khmer, Tibet, Turkey(Ottomans), Assyria, Persia, Babylon, Phoenicia (or Israel), Hittites, and an Anatolian civ.
Pre-Colombian America:
Inca, Maya.

 

[Zaarin]

Tlingit, really? Maybe Marsians?

Why not the Tlingit? They were a major power in the Pacific Northwest (one might even say the major power in the Pacific Northwest), which was the most densely populated region in Pre-Columbian North America and had an artistic heritage that was second to none.

Any other native American besides Sioux? And I imagine besides the most oft used Iroquois?
Ok, how about: Cherokee, Navajo, Haida, Huron, Mississipian(Cahokia), Powhatan, Apache, Inuit, Comanche, Anasazi (not Pueblo!!!!)?

I wouldn't object to seeing the Iroquois again (they were certainly significant enough), but I would prefer to see someone new, yes. The Cherokee would be interesting (they or the Creek would be great representatives of the Southeast), the Navajo would be okay, the Huron wouldn't make sense vis-a-vis the Iroquois, we know too little of the Mississippians, the Powhatan would have linguistic problems, the Apache aren't really significant enough and would likely be too similar to Scythia in abilities, the Comanche were in Civ5 (they were just called the Shoshone for reasons), the Inuit aren't Native American, the Anasazi are the Pueblo and we know too little about them.

Almost no one has ever heard of Tlingit!, just type in Haida the next time, a name far more known to common folk.

Aw, it sure would be a shame to educate people about an important part of Pre-Columbian history and culture; they might stop thinking that Native Americans still wear buckskins and are all Sioux. Besides, I'm not convinced that Haida would be any more familiar than Tlingit, though I'd welcome the Haida (or the Tsimshian) as well. Besides, probably the second most familiar icon of Native American cultures (after the Sioux warbonnet) is Tlingit in origin: the crest pole, aka "totem pole."

 

[Beuyse13]

Tlingit, really? Maybe Marsians?

Any other native American besides Sioux? And I imagine besides the most oft used Iroquois?
Ok, how about: Cherokee, Navajo, Haida, Huron, Mississipian(Cahokia), Powhatan, Apache, Inuit, Comanche, Anasazi (not Pueblo!!!!)?

Almost no one has ever heard of Tlingit!, just type in Haida the next time, a name far more known to common folk.

My suggestions for the sake of history(mainly):
Africa:
Mali, Ethiopia, Morocco and Zulu (or South Africa led by Mandela)
Europe:
Sweden, Poland, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Scotland, Byzantium, Italy, Etruscans, Minoans.
Asia:
Korea, Tatars, Khazaria, Siam, Khmer, Tibet, Turkey(Ottomans), Assyria, Persia, Babylon, Phoenicia (or Israel), Hittites, and an Anatolian civ.
Pre-Colombian America:
Inca, Maya.

Id like to see the apache, large benefits from plains and grassland
Tatars and Khazaria sound good

 

[Beuyse13]

That civ might just be called "Indonesia" like in BNW.

I guess but the abilities are a bit different

 

[Beuyse13]

BTW guys thanks for all the ideas hopefully some devs see this thread so plz carry on creating with a format like this

Civ:
Leader:
UU:
UD:
UA:
LA:

(for those who dont know UU is Unique Unit , UD is Unique District, UA is unique ability and LA is leader Ability

 

[Krajzen]

Ottomans
Persia
Inca
Native American civ
SE Asian civ

Exactly this. As last two for example Cherokee and Burma.