I used to be very much like you. You will see the light in time my child, and come to know the POWER of the traditional side. I was orionally educated with the simplified, and figured out soon enough it was crap. For reasons read on.
@ the other guy. Handwriting has it's plusses, but that plus is not in official documents and publications. I would no more want chinese handwriting as an offical standard t3n i wud wnt AIM skrl as n oficial 3nglish 14ngu4age wrtin systim. y? bcuz itz annoyn an inferiar.
Becides, Simplified goes so so far beyond simple bushou (radical)simplification. It simply makes up characters, which Kongzi tells me is just immoral

Take for example the "yi4" in Mao2zhu3yi4 (Maoisim). It looks like an X with a dot and a greek iota. Gross. Not only gross but hard to memorize since none of those components suggest either meaning OR prounciation. I don't think the whole simplification idea was so terrible, but the application was generally bad and came out looking as good as anything that comes out of a communist comittie. For example I find the Japanese simplifcations are both time saving and don't diminish the beauty of the Characters, however the post Liberation simplifications often butcher.
I WONT EVEN get into character synthesis where they take multiple traditional Characters and meld them into one simplified character. This often results in comically bad/unreadable translations of classical texts.
Oh? and the final test. Literacy. Hong Kong and Taiwan BOTH use tradtional and both have higher literacy rates than the simplified Mainland. You might be able to argue from that that their GDP is higher and economy is more developed - and you may be right - but the one thing you cannot argue is that tradtional system is too ponderous or inefficient to be useful since both those areas have higher literacy. So in my view why not have your cake and eat it too, the higher literacy AND the better looking system. Who likes the simplified for 'love' and 'dragon' anyway?