Com(mie)NESI: The Wake of the Lion

Nation Name: Zulus
Capital: Illetahanda
Ruler: trader/warrior
Government: Monarchy
Tech. Level: Early Classical Age
Army: 60,000 Soldiers
Navy: 5 Ships
Economy:Rich(+1)
Education: Illiterate
Culture: Devided
Confidence: Respectful
Projects:
Nation Background: The Zulus are a tribal people emerging in south africa. They may be something but it will take a strong leader and alot of work.
 
OOC: ARRGH! Why still no Saba (in Yemen)? I want to play them!

Also, Nan Yue is rather smaller. And they are not Chinese, ethnically they're Thai.
 
To Selecuid Empire
From Mauryan Emperor Chandragupta Maruya

We wish for peace even with your "people". So therefore I great Emperor Chandragupta Maurya Lord of the Mauryan Empire, Conqueror of Rajastan, Destroyer of Kingdoms, and All Knowing Benavolent King grant a 5 years of peace to you.

Shorth Version: 5 turn NAP
 
@Commounisto are you going to fix the borders in India? The correct borders are shown in the map I've posted.
Maurya should not own southern India. Mauryan EMpire extends into Afghanistan and Persia and the northern part of Persia are Greek-Macedonian city states.
 
To World
From Mauryan Empire Chandragupta Maruya

I Great Emperor of the Mauryan Empire lay claim to the following land:

Claim.JPG


(Shown in Red)

All those who dare challange this claim speak now so I can crush you!
 
To: Mauryan Empire
From: Nan-Yue

Your claims are ridiculous. Our Nation is the rightful owner of the lands east of teh Bengal Delta. Withdraw you claims!
 
To Nan-Yue
From Mauryan Empire

Who do you think you are to DARE tell the great Mauryan Emperor Chandragupta Maurya what to do! You tremble befor our might and power! Humbule yourself!
The Mauryan Empire has laid claim to all that land and NOTHING (short of a nation straonger than we are which you are not) could EVER make us change that claim. It is our god give right to this land!
 
To: Mauryan "Empire"
From: Nan-Yue

What right do YOU have? We are not frightened by you. The Nan-Yue are superior to your disgusting race and we will fight you if we must!
 
Carthage wasn't a monarchy. It had a oligarctic governemnt, not much diffirent from that of Rome's republic.
 
nazi, that wasn't always like that.

Communisto, from Britannica:


Saba`,

biblical SHEBA, kingdom in pre-Islamic southwestern Arabia, frequently mentioned in the Bible (notably in the story of King Solomon and the Queen of
Sheba) and variously cited by ancient Assyrian, Greek, and Roman writers from about the 8th century BC to about the 5th century AD. Its capital, at least in the
middle period, was Ma`rib (q.v.), which lies 75 miles (120 km) east of present-day San'a`, in Yemen. A second major city was Sirwah.

The Sabaeans were a Semitic people who, at an unknown date, entered southern Arabia from the north, imposing their Semitic culture on an aboriginal
population. Excavations in central Yemen suggest that the Sabaean civilization began as early as the 10th-12th century BC. By the 7th-5th century BC, besides
"kings of Saba` " there were individuals styling themselves "mukarribs of Saba`," who apparently either were high priest-princes or exercised some function parallel
to the kingly function. This middle period was characterized above all by a tremendous outburst of building activity, principally at Ma`rib and Sirwah, and most of
the great temples and monuments, including the great Ma`rib Dam, on which Sabaean agricultural prosperity depended, date back to this period. Further, there was
an ever-shifting pattern of alliances and wars between Saba` and other peoples of southwestern Arabia--not only the important kingdoms of Qataban and
Hadramawt but also a number of lesser but still independent kingdoms and city-states.

Saba` was rich in spices and agricultural products and carried on a wealth of trade by overland caravan and by sea. For centuries it controlled Bab el-Mandeb, the
straits leading into the Red Sea, and it established many colonies on the African shores. That Abyssinia (Ethiopia) was peopled from South Arabia is proved
linguistically; but the difference between the Sabaean and Ethiopian languages is such as to imply that the settlement was very early and that there were many
centuries of separation, during which the Abyssinians were exposed to foreign influences. New colonies, however, seem occasionally to have followed, and some
parts of the African coast were under the suzerainty of the Sabaean kings as late as the 1st century BC.

Toward the end of the 3rd century AD, a powerful king named Shamir Yuhar'ish (who seems incidentally to be the first really historical personage whose fame has
survived in the Islamic traditions) assumed the title "king of Saba` and the Dhu Raydan and of Hadramawt and Yamanat." By this time, therefore, the political
independence of Hadramawt had succumbed to Saba`, which had thus become the controlling power in all southwestern Arabia. In the mid-4th century AD, it
underwent a temporary eclipse, for the title of "king of Saba` and the Dhu Raydan" was then claimed by the king of Aksum on the east African coast. At the end of
the 4th century, southern Arabia was again independent under a "king of Saba` and the Dhu Raydan and Hadramawt and Yamanat." But within two centuries the
Sabaeans would disappear as they were successively overrun by Persian adventurers and by the Muslim Arabs.
 
das said:
nazi, that wasn't always like that.

This is from the wikipedia:

Carthage's government was an oligarchy, not unlike that of republican Rome, but only few details are known. Its heads of state are commonly referred to as "sufets" (literally, "judges"; Roman writers referred to them as "reges", kings), which might originally have been the title of the city's governor installed by the mother city of Tyre. Later, one or two sufets, who are believed to have exercised judicial and executive, but not military, functions were elected annually from among the most wealthy and influential families. Those aristocratic families were represented in a supreme council, comparable to the senate in Rome, which had a wide range of powers, but it is not known whether the sufets were elected by this council or by an assembly of the people. Although the people might have had influence on legislation as well, democratic elements were rather weak in Carthage, and the city's administration was firmly controlled by oligarchs.
 
I seem to remember a military dictatorship after some nasty defeat in Sicily at some point...
 
Nation Name: Armenia
Capital: Ani
Ruler: King Artashes II/ Azale
Government: Monarchy
Tech. Level: Early Classical Age
Army: 80,000 Soldiers
Navy: 10 Ships
Economy: Normal(+1)
Education: Educated
Culture: Strongly-Cultured
Confidence: Tolerating
Projects:
Nation Background: A strong Caucasus nation that packs a good amount of punch considering the region.

Fixed up the template some, found the leaders and capital. :king:

Diplomacy

To: Greek-City States
From: King Artashes II of Armenia

Are you willing to part with your colonies on the border of Armenia and your more eastern north Anatolia one?

To: Seleucid Empire
From: King Artashes II of Armenia

We propose an alliance of our two nations. We respect and admire Greek culture and civilization, and believe the strength of our two nations together cannot be matched!

To: Bosphoron Kingdom
From: King Artashes II of Armenia

Greetings. We wish to extend the olive branch of peace, and we also ask for trade. Do you accept?
 
Back
Top Bottom