Dan rather innocent

"The documens were said to be fake but accurate?"

Ok first off, does this statement make any sense to anyone whatsoever?

Hell even in the namesake it says fake, so yes the documents were forged. If they're faked that means...well...they're not accurate.

Get a clue people.
 
covok48 said:
"The documens were said to be fake but accurate?"

Ok first off, does this statement make any sense to anyone whatsoever?
IIRC, "fake but accurate" came from a NY Times headline during the uproar.

The statement not making sense is kind of the joke. :)

Commie #4522 said:
ok maybe t he documents werent REAL, but their message behind them is TRUE.
Proof, please.
 
"ok maybe t he documents werent REAL, but their message behind them is TRUE."

Stop...just stop. Common sense is escaping the left in real life and this thread.
 
Commie #4522 said:
What do u guys think?

I think that whichever side of this you are on that it is yesterday's stale news.

As far as Dan Rather's career goes, story or no story, he hasn't been pulling in the ratings for a long time, so it's time to go. Go gracefully or get fired.
 
covok48 said:
"ok maybe t he documents werent REAL, but their message behind them is TRUE."

Stop...just stop. Common sense is escaping the left in real life and this thread.
i can read too, you're from texas. Love bush much? Ofcourse u think he is perfect and wouldnt cheat on his miltiary service.. DOH
 
Commie #4522 said:
i can read too, you're from texas. Love bush much? Ofcourse u think he is perfect and wouldnt cheat on his miltiary service.. DOH

Wow, so everyone from Texas voted for Bush? I guess I'm just gonna have to report this for uhh..State Bashing or something.
 
Commie, you're right now facing the same sort of battle as if you were saying "But maybe OJ was innocent!"

"If the documents were fake, Dan must have made a mistake" doesn't make a good catchphrase either...
 
Commie #4522 said:
ok maybe t he documents werent REAL, but their message behind them is TRUE.
Well, maybe Abraham Lincoln didn't really die, maybe he just had his brain transplanted into a radioactive monkey, and lives on, to this day, free and radioactive in the African paradise? MAYBE?! :crazyeye:

Commie, you're staying into what I've heard called the "the ever expanding hypothetical". Basically, that means you're putting forward a hypothetical situation, that doesn't make sense, and constanting changing and expanding it when even then it doesn't make sense.

Stop. Just stop. It's already embarassing to Americans.
 
There is something called journalistic integrity. OK, there USED to be something called journalistic Integrity. Now there is only shock and awe and who can I get to believe what?

Why is it everytime a blonde haired, blue eyed girl goes missing it's on every news channel in the country?
 
Elrohir said:
Well, maybe Abraham Lincoln didn't really die, maybe he just ad his brain transplanted into a radioactive monkey, and lives on, to this day, free and radioactive in the African paradise? MAYBE?! :crazyeye:

Commie, you're staying into what I've heard called the "the ever expanding hypothetical". Basically, that means you're putting forward a hypothetical situation, that doesn't make sense, and constanting changing and expanding it when even then it doesn't make sense.

Stop. Just stop. It's already embarassing to Americans.
Think again, ppl like you who vote for bush are embarassing americans. what do you think the world thinks of us when we elected that moron not ONCE but twice. i don't even know how a guy like bush got out of his daddys house in the first place much less make a prez!!!
 
Commie #4522 said:
Think again, ppl like you who vote for bush are embarassing americans. what do you think the world thinks of us when we elected that moron not ONCE but twice. i don't even know how a guy like bush got out of his daddys house in the first place much less make a prez!!!

No, the embarrassing Americans are those who refuse to believe that it is possible to hold another opinion. While I disagree with the idea that the documents are fake, I don't think that everyone who disagrees with me is an embarrassing American or think that anything other my belief is inconceivable. You started this debate on the Dan Rather memo, and have declined numerous requests to give a link or a source, and now are personally attacking other posters.
 
ybbor said:
No, the embarrassing Americans are those who refuse to believe that it is possible to hold another opinion. While I disagree with the idea that the documents are fake, I don't think that everyone who disagrees with me is an embarrassing American or think that anything other my belief is inconceivable. You started this debate on the Dan Rather memo, and have declined numerous requests to give a link or a source, and now are personally attacking other posters.
I'm not attacking any1
 
Commie #4522 said:
Think again, ppl like you who vote for bush are embarassing americans. what do you think the world thinks of us when we elected that moron not ONCE but twice. i don't even know how a guy like bush got out of his daddys house in the first place much less make a prez!!!

Reported. ;)
 
Commie #4522 said:
Think again, ppl like you who vote for bush are embarassing americans. what do you think the world thinks of us when we elected that moron not ONCE but twice. i don't even know how a guy like bush got out of his daddys house in the first place much less make a prez!!!

My advice for you is just keeping voting for Nader.:goodjob:

Yu goo doog.:goodjob:
 
I tend to think, with absolutely no proof, of course, that someone once saw the real documetns, couldn't leak them out like they wanted, so had them remade to say what he saw. So they are faked, clearly, but probably accurate. But I disagree with using dishonesty to get what you want, so Dan Rather and the people who duped him are certainly not innocent.
 
Mr. Do said:
I tend to think, with absolutely no proof, of course, that someone once saw the real documetns, couldn't leak them out like they wanted, so had them remade to say what he saw. So they are faked, clearly, but probably accurate. But I disagree with using dishonesty to get what you want, so Dan Rather and the people who duped him are certainly not innocent.
Why couldn't they release the real documents? Why couldn't they at least make copies of the originals, then? Why did they try to make the new versions look old? Nice theory, but I don't think it's very likely.
 
Back
Top Bottom