I will be away from the 4th to 16th without access to the internet. So we should finish our discussion today or (latest Monday afternoon), that I can play on Monday evening and write the report on Tuesday. Hope that is okay.
In the following I compare the relevant criteria for war against either Hanni or SB.
Since most of us favor the war against SB, I will play advocatus diaboli now and write a bit in favor of a war against Han.
Han:
Pro
-Close distance, potential for a very quick war. We can use galleys as troop transporter.
- Easy prey (as Snaaty mentioned). I like to have a first war against an backwards AI. The war is quickly over and gives a boost to military infrastructure, since it will give us our first gg which we can use as a warlord. That unlocks WP and will give us a strong healer. Both big assets in the more difficult war against SB.
- Through Han we will have land access to Charles cities.
SB:
Contra:
-More dependent on logistics, we cannot use our galleys and need gallons to reach the easternmost island of SB. On that way we are exposed to SB's navy which will be (as normal for deity AIs) very strong.
-Higher Distance means more upkeep.
Pro:
-SB land is way better. Most of his cities will not expose us to cultural pressure.
Open for discussion:
- Is the aim to vassalize SB or take all his cities? When taking his first 3 cities (those on the island with Pericles and Zara) we will face enourmous pressure from Pericles and Zara. On the other hand we will be on the same island with Pericles and Zara...
- Bribe charles into war if the opportunity shows? this way we could negate his SD with Zara and attack Charles instead.
- Rifles or grens. Here we have to weight the danger through enemy cavalry (which we can counter easiest with rifles) and through eneny grens. All the AIs can research MS.
I would do the RR trade and go for rifles since our cannons should deal with potential grens.
In the following I compare the relevant criteria for war against either Hanni or SB.
Since most of us favor the war against SB, I will play advocatus diaboli now and write a bit in favor of a war against Han.

Han:
Pro
-Close distance, potential for a very quick war. We can use galleys as troop transporter.
- Easy prey (as Snaaty mentioned). I like to have a first war against an backwards AI. The war is quickly over and gives a boost to military infrastructure, since it will give us our first gg which we can use as a warlord. That unlocks WP and will give us a strong healer. Both big assets in the more difficult war against SB.
- Through Han we will have land access to Charles cities.
SB:
Contra:
-More dependent on logistics, we cannot use our galleys and need gallons to reach the easternmost island of SB. On that way we are exposed to SB's navy which will be (as normal for deity AIs) very strong.
-Higher Distance means more upkeep.
Pro:
-SB land is way better. Most of his cities will not expose us to cultural pressure.
Open for discussion:
- Is the aim to vassalize SB or take all his cities? When taking his first 3 cities (those on the island with Pericles and Zara) we will face enourmous pressure from Pericles and Zara. On the other hand we will be on the same island with Pericles and Zara...
- Bribe charles into war if the opportunity shows? this way we could negate his SD with Zara and attack Charles instead.
- Rifles or grens. Here we have to weight the danger through enemy cavalry (which we can counter easiest with rifles) and through eneny grens. All the AIs can research MS.
I would do the RR trade and go for rifles since our cannons should deal with potential grens.