Sarevok
Civ3 Scenario Creator
ill be sure to look at those and learn of these 'horrors' you speak of.
Originally posted by FionnMcCumhall
Deputies should never be elected only leaders, runners up in elections are the deputies enough said. We have a hard enough time filling the positions we have when we get close to the end of a game/middle of a game.
DZ we really dont need another discussion on political parties. They shouldnt be allowed ever in this game. It instills too much of a problem in my opinion. Im sure you and eyrei dont need that headache, because i can guarentee a flareup by someone unhappy with the voting process during any election that someone loses. There will be accusations of vote fixing and anything else someone can come up with.
Instead of parties why not try lobbyist's
Originally posted by zorven
I think we are getting off track. A poll has already passed stating that we should start with the DG2 rules and work from there. So any further discussion in this thread should be proposing and discussing specific changes to the DG2 constitution. I assume DZ is leading this process, so can you post threads for the CoL and CoS?
*donsig lugs out the Three Books and burns them*
There, now they're gone.
Do we really want to have PIs?
Originally posted by Donovan Zoi
Not quite, donsig. It seems you are missing the point of my post, as well as that of the modification process.
The Three Books will still remain the outline by which we define our new laws, although I am willing to concede that it would be easier to modify the Constitution from DG3. And things like the National Park law will most likely be removed. As a matter of fact, we will probably end up with an entirely different looking ruleset that happens to keep the same basic structure.